³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Ceri, denying a conspiracy is simply grist to the conspiracy theorist's mill, you can't win!

It was a very interesting interview nonetheless, I listened as I drove to the station this morning. Evan is obviously very interested in the subjects he's covering and this comes across in his approach - it adds a fascinating new dynamic to the Today programme I think.

Alan Johnson is always good value as well!

It all sounds fair enough, and it really matters not whether it was cock up or conspiracy as there was no actual harm done to anyone as a result.

Unless we count some political point scoring as harm.

It makes for odd reading that you are saying 'honestly. we just inept at our jobs', but its good to see you holding your hands up to this fact.

I guess you have to, you must know half the country doesn't trust a word you say anymore.

With all the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ integrated news services, should not someone responsible for the programme containing Frank Field's comments have got in touch with the main domestic newsgathering desks and tipped them off to listen out for Mr Field's remarks. Even better provided a summary! And the press office could have alerted the main newspaper political correspondents.What Frank Field had to say is as interesting as Lord Levy's remarks on yesterday's Andrew Marr programme. Even though he has an axe to grind. As does Lord L!

Perhaps someone from the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Newswire team could use this as an opportunity to explain a bit about their work? And why this one slipped through the net?

"No conspiracy at all" - just plain incompetence then, not really much to boast about is it?

A perfect example of how not enough people actually doing the front line jobs resulted in poorer quality journalism. A lesson.
Where was the Multi Media Editor?

Human beings are fallible and so are human organisations. It was a good story, and well handled both by you and by Alan Johnson.

But I hope you come back to the social services story, which is important and doesn't get enough coverage. Get Ivan Lewis on. He has the benefit of front line experience, which his boss hasn't.

Personally, I'm all in favour of asking politicians those questions which haven't been trailblazed.

It keeps them on their toes and can provide opportunity for hearing what they really think, before the telepaged on-party messages leap in to corrupt their thinking.

Bring on the Conspiracies - Bring it On !

Anyway the first part of the interview was far more interesting than the second part in which Johnson stated

'the problem is huge and important and must be tackled'

'so, have you got a policy on it then after 11 years'

'no but we are going to have a meeting and a review about it'

'that will be no action then after 11 years. A meeting and a doesn't sound like policy action'

'sorry ... I can't hear you.....my headphones have slipped''

(not quite verbatim but you get the message)