³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ News comes to Burma
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ World News will soon be available in Burma. Those are words that, even six months ago, I would not have imagined writing. But Burma, a byword for media censorship and repression, is starting to open up.
In September I visited Burma to begin the negotiations which led to this breakthrough in ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ distribution. I was struck by how rapid the media changes are for a country where state media had been long stuck in a repressive timewarp.
A World Service team visited the state broadcaster. We saw the most surreal newsroom I have ever visited. There were no journalists there. "Why not?" we asked. "We don't need them yet. The news hasn't arrived."
We learnt the news is literally delivered once a day by the state news agency. The job of the journalists was to read it out, word for word, unaltered.
But those journalists and editors are now keen to have the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ's help in learning about open and balanced journalism. It will be a long road, given the ingrained habits of censorship and self-censorship.
But the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ, through its pioneering media development charity ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Media Action, is able to offer training to editors and journalists to teach them what independent journalism is. Even officials from the Ministry of Information, the former censors, asked if they could go on ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ journalism courses. Alongside the desire for training, the opening up of Burma to international broadcasters is naturally to be welcomed.
However, there is a long way to go. The massively popular ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Burmese service, which we estimate is listened to by more than eight million people a week, is not yet allowed to broadcast within Burma. It is transmitted only on shortwave, faithfully listened to, as Aung San Suu Kyi has done for so many years. We urge the government to fully open its airwaves.
And we told the Burmese government that the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ would continue to scrutinise the country closely. Indeed, as it becomes possible for our journalists to travel within the country, reports such as Fergal Keane's recent searing Newsnight film on human rights abuses in Rakhine state, will form a key part of the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ's role in the country.
We will also continue to report the progress being made in the political and economic spheres.
At this early stage of opening up, it is hard to know if the hopes of media freedom will be fulfilled, but it is at least an encouraging sign that the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ can now report from and to the country in English.
Authoritarian governments everywhere are asking themselves if they can and should hold back the free flow of news any more. And, as they ask themselves these questions, politicians, officials and journalists are looking to the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ as the international exemplar of quality, impartial and independent journalism.
Peter Horrocks is the director of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Global News
Comment number 1.
At 17th Dec 2012, JunkkMale wrote:I read this...
'Burma, a byword for media censorship...'
..under this..
'³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ News comes to Burma'
Guessing getting the modding and complaints handling done here was proving pricey?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 17th Dec 2012, snyp3r wrote:this good news for burma, bbc is good portal news.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 17th Dec 2012, murray fink wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 17th Dec 2012, David Long wrote:Nice to see "Beeb in Burma" and not Myanmar; but a bit worried by the comment: "³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Media Action, is able to offer training to editors and journalists to teach them what independent journalism is."
Given the "group think" for which Beeb is noted, ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Media Action trained journalists will most likely inherit that trait.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 18th Dec 2012, visoin55 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 18th Dec 2012, TrueToo wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 18th Dec 2012, BluesBerry wrote:Sounds good, especilly training for journalists, but is it? Timing is highly suspicious. Burma & Cambodia, have had close economic & military ties with China. Obama’s visit was aimed at consolidating US efforts to entice, pressure, bully these countries to distance themselves from Beijing - engage more closely with US.
Now the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is working to engage Burma. It seems to me like a one-two punch
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 18th Dec 2012, This is a colleague announcement wrote:"We urge the government to fully open its airwaves."
===
Ignoring the split infinitive, no country has "fully open" airwaves. The result would be unuseable RF chaos.
Burma will have to decide on a regulatory and licensing system, and to be appropriate in the changing technological world this will need careful thought and analysis.
I wish them success in this considerable undertaking.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 19th Dec 2012, thncvclairton wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)