³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

« Previous | Main | Next »

Barclays boss speaks out

Post categories:

Declan Curry | 10:45 UK time, Friday, 13 March 2009

Senior bankers - those at the very top of our major financial institutions - are traditionally souls of discretion.

They do not make a habit of speaking out. They tend to shy away from controversy. Any criticism is murmured softly, if it is given voice at all.

Sir Nigel Rudd is not your typical senior banker.

Yes, he enjoys the title of deputy chairman at Barclays. He helps run one of our biggest banks.

But he is a man rooted deep in manufacturing and industry.

He is also used to speaking his mind.

Yet on Thursday's Working Lunch is still surprising, both for its bluntness and for the fact that he said it at all.

He described bank bosses who led their companies to the brink of collapse as "lunatics". And he called their business practices "ridiculous".

As I noted with some astonishment during the interview itself, this is not the type of language that bankers use - certainly not to describe each other.

But it shouldn't surprise us that he has strong views about the banking crisis that is causing so much pain throughout business.

He's been at the top of British industry for a generation, and is seriously well-connected.

He passed up the prospect of university for a comprehensive training as an accountant. When he qualified, he was the youngest such person ever to do so at the time.

(He did it because he was good at it, and because his mother told him she had never met a poor accountant.)

His first big break came in his early 20s in south Wales, when he took on a struggling property business. He eventually branched out into engineering - and built one of the UK's biggest industrial holding companies, owning businesses as diverse as fire extinguishers and door locks.

He is one of the most prolific deal makers of the last 25 years, buying and (mostly) selling some of our most-famous names.

He built up his industrial group, Williams, with a string of takeovers - then broke it down again by selling the individual businesses off.

He sold the glass company Pilkington to a Japanese firm.

He got the high street chemists Boots into bed with a European rival, then sold off the whole lot.

Today, he either runs, or is a senior director of, the airport company BAA, the Pendragon car showrooms, the industrial firm Invensys and the defence giant BAE.

All of these are companies that are feeling the pinch from the recession and the credit crunch.

His car sales business, Pendragon, faced a particularly tight squeeze when one of its European bankers shut down its credit lines.

That must have been quite a contradiction for a man who is both industrialist and banker at the same time.

Sir Nigel stands down from his Barclays job in just a few weeks.

Perhaps he's feeling demob happy, or freer to speak out than other colleagues.

But friends say he's also frustrated by the credit crisis, and what he sees as the role of bankers and regulators and city analysts in stoking it.

He is said to pin the blame on the bosses of former building societies like Northern Rock and Halifax, who ditched decades of prudent lending for a torrent of easy money, luring customers in with cut-throat deals underpinned by risky funding from the markets.

It's an area Barclays knows. It bought the Woolwich mortgage lender in the mid 1990s, but found it couldn't compete with the bargains on offer from Northern Rock and others. While Sir Nigel was on the board, Barclays decided not to chase that business and saw its share of the mortgage market shrink - to the disapproval of city analysts.

But critics will say that Barclays is not itself without sin.

You and I might think of it as a collection of high street branches, but that retail banking business is dwarfed by its city trading arms - arms with massive investments that have gone sour.

Barclays is still making a profit. It has not needed a bail-out from the British government. It is not reliant on us taxpayers for its survival.

But it needed a multi-billion pound cash injection from investors in the middle east.

And it's looks like it may have to sign up to the Government's scheme to decontaminate toxic assets - in other words, dump some of its dodgier investments into our laps.

So we may have to support Barclays after all.

Will that be "lunatic" or "ridiculous"? From April, that won't be Sir Nigel's problem ....

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    I would like to express my disgust with your item on people offering 'ways out' of debts.

    There was no hint of a suggestion from you, or the adverts, that it may be appropriate to get overcharged fees reduced or stopped only, but an impression it is perfectly reasonable to try to wriggle out of any debt you can by some technicality.

    No sense of decency or moral duty to pay back what YOU borrowed.


    Anyone availing themselves of any such 'service' with the objective of not paying back what they owe is utterly reprehensible.

    This sort of blithe attitude to paying back other people's money is the ultimate cause of all the credit crunch. If they all paid back all they borrowed there would be no problem.

    Not paying bank all you borrow and due interest should be a criminal offence of theft. Not ever 'let off' by bankruptcy or individual voluntary arrangements.

  • Comment number 2.

    Not quite what I had expected to comment on today, but I sympathize to some extent with #1. Saw a TV commercial yesterday which contained the phrase: "so you don't have to pay back what you owe". I put it on a par with those 'lawyers' who claim "you don't have to pay that parking ticket / speeding fine" (despite the fact you obviously deserve it)... Q

  • Comment number 3.

    I think its time to removed the link from working lunch website which says
    "Declan's Blog
    Keep up-to-date with Declan's business news and views "

    Since its been 18days and counting since declan has written anything here

  • Comment number 4.

    Out to lunch team.


    What is wrong with you? Your and guests STUPIDITY at glee of the chance house prices may not be falling. Houses are grossly over priced still. Will you be as Gleeful when petrol prices rise? Food prices? Idiots!

    ALL our problems were caused by you lot WANTING houses to be ever more expensive.

    If they do rise, it is well time to put interest rates up to 8% and more to stop them.


    Still why you have a blog at all is mystifying. What will it be one post a month?

    Off trivial twittering I suppose.

  • Comment number 5.

    Your excellent presenters on today's Working Lunch seemed a bit confused about the British Airways unions using lemmings as a symbol of their protest - I think it means that those who have agreed to what I consider shall I say 'quite unacceptable' demands by the management are saying, like lemmings, they just following management policy and not fighting them like lemmings are supposed to do - follow each other. However it does seem from QI with Steven Fry lemmings,in fact do not do that-it is a myth - so there !

    Incidentily Mr Curry somewhile ago interestingly admonished a guest when the guest accused someone of being a 'luddite' - Mr Curry saying 'we do not use that term hear' at last someone who seems to know who the luddites actually where! Could you expand on this I would like to know more. I think I have heard this term used a lot and nobody except Mr Curry knows what they are talking about - a programme on Luddites would be useful!
    Cheers

Ìý

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.