³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - Test Match Special
« Previous | Main | Next »

Sussex still the team to beat

Kevin Howells | 10:51 UK time, Tuesday, 15 April 2008

This is a job I loathe. The only people who will enjoy reading it will be those who will keep a copy and come waving it in my face in August proving how wrong I was.

Predictions for the new county season is not only a fool's game but also if I was a coach or captain and someone put in print that my side would be relegated before a ball was bowled in anger I would think them pretty stupid.

But I got the call and was told I had to do it and so I have.

To try to make sense of a very competitive Championship race I will divide the nine teams into three groups of three and, starting with the clubs most likely to win - Sussex, Lancashire and Somerset.

Mushtaq Ahmed


I believe Sussex will win that sought-after hat-trick of titles. If only for the reason that I can't think of why they shouldn't.

I mustn't keep saying it depends if key players stay fit but how much longer can 37-year-old Mushtaq Ahmed keep going? Overall, with Matt Prior back for the summer, they look a stronger squad than last year. Prior will score runs and even if he doesn't keep wicket his work as a fielder will be vital.

I watched Lancashire practice last week and, looking at the quality of players at their disposal, couldn't get my head around why they have gone for so long without major trophies.

Andrew Flintoff should get them off to a strong start, players old and young should respond well to new captain Stuart Law, and they should push Sussex all the way again.

With so little difference between the squads it really could come down to the weather. Hove appears to be in a very special spot. I often read "rain stopped play" at Canterbury and the Rose Bowl but somehow they still play on further along at the seaside. That is why I select Sussex.

If Sussex and Lancashire slip up Justin Langer, Marcus Trescothick and Andrew Caddick will lead the challenge from the south west and Somerset are very serious contenders.

The jump from the Second to the First Division is a difficult one but with that experience and talent at Taunton they should prove difficult opponents. Back-up bowling to Caddick could prove an issue, though.

The middle three involves Durham, Surrey and Yorkshire. All three have a chance and will make up the top six who could all be challenging for the title right up until the beginning of September.

Durham will miss Ottis Gibson badly but with Steve Harmison available for who knows how long and Graham Onions and Liam Plunkett around they posses bowling to back up an exciting batting order.

Mark Ramprakash will carry on getting loads of runs but do Surrey have the bowling to win enough games?

Yorkshire's failure to maintain performances with bat and ball for the entire season last year remains an issue and that is why I can't see them winning the title.

Gough was outstanding as captain in 2007 and his commitment to playing through the pain barrier was fantastic but potential must become much more than that if they are to lift silverware.

The fight to avoid the drop is most likely to involve, Hampshire, Kent and Nottinghamshire. I pick these three because they appear to face the biggest challenges.

Chris Read could make a very good captain at Trent Bridge but what boots to fill with Stephen Fleming now gone. One of Nottinghamshire's strengths has always been the whole team effort but without England regular Ryan Sidebottom they have lost a vital match winner.

Kent will continue to be well led by Rob Key. Winning the Twenty20 Cup was a tremendous result for them and could be repeated, but at this stage I see little to convince me they will win many Championship games.


Shane Warne will be missed


Hampshire will miss more than any team will miss any player - including Sussex and Mushtaq in the future - and I therefore think they also face a tough summer.

Now that Shane Bond is allowed to play he could help keep them safe but I fancy a tough year at the Rose Bowl.

As for the Second Division, Warwickshire should never have been relegated and to watch their poor displays last year was very disappointing. Ashley Giles should make all the difference in getting them back up.

Worcestershire's lack of bowling apart from Kabir Ali was also going to struggle in the top flight and they should find their squad now very competitive again in the lower league. Ali is like Matthew Hoggard at Yorkshire and Harmison at Durham to name a couple - bowlers who don't fancy being overlooked by England just yet.

Look out for Glamorgan and Derbyshire. Changes at both those clubs since last September means they should be in with a shout.

Especially so at Cardiff, where with a new stadium and Matthew Maynard back with an impressive bunch of youngsters, they can "do a Durham" and I'm certain they will do so this year or in 2009.

In terms of the overall picture, the whole domestic game will miss Warne, including the umpires.

He did what other captains often don’t do - risk losing to win. It doesn't work every time and for everyone but I do hope in this season more than any other recently captains remember to entertain.

County cricket will get a bashing this year unless the and while I don't question for a minute anyone's right to play wherever and for whoever they want, they should all spare a moment to think about the future of the game of which they are a product.

There has been a lot of talk about the big names missing this season. Well I don't much care about that. There is enough young and promising talent to enjoy in both divisions. From Adil Rashid to Paul Horton and Billy Godleman to name but a few.

There is even that new kid on the block, 32-year-old Alan Richardson of Middlesex. I would not be on my own raising a glass to further recognition of his often understated performances.

Sidebottom is not quite as old, of course, but what happened in 2007/8 to him should be a lesson for a few more that hard work in the Championship can be rewarded.

Predictions of failure are often posted on dressing room notice boards as an incentive to prove another media idiot wrong. Well to all those players, good luck and all the best.

As long as you are not suffering from the same self doubt as I am writing this you will be fine.

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌýPost your comment

  • 1.
  • At 11:18 AM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Mark wrote:

I am surprised by your assessment of Kent's chances. By my reckoning and what I've seen so far in pre-season, I think they'll be a long way from the relegation places.

As for Surrey, the bowling remains the issue. They struggled to bowl teams out last year, and if it wasn't for the batsmen rattling up high totals, they surely would've been relegated last season. I fear for them this season too, unless Saqlain comes up with the goods once more and Jordan goes from strength to strength. Ramps to get his 100th 100 by end of May I reckon...

M.

  • 2.
  • At 11:22 AM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Lef wrote:

Lancashire and Sussex will again contend for the title, Somerset's back-up bowling isn't strong enough for them to be a consistent threat.

I can see the middle group being made up of Kent, Durham, Surrey, Yorkshire and Somerset.

Hampshire and Notts will most likely be relegated, Hampshire's squad is very unsettled and was always overrated anyway in my opinion. Nottinghamshire didn't exactly set Division Two on fire last season and haven't significantly strengthened the squad.

As a twist, I can see one of the middle-group making a concerted effort for the title as a 'dark horse' like Durham did last year. I can also see one of the middle group becoming the 'free-fallers' like Warwickshire did last year.

This is possibly the strongest Division One we've ever had and i'm looking forward to following every minute of every match.

  • 3.
  • At 11:26 AM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Mike wrote:

Your comments on Kent are frankly astonishing......This is largely the same squad as 2007 enhanced with a few key recruits that will go a long way to strengthening the squad - the return of Khan, Saggers raring to go from the off, Mahmood, mean they will have one of the strongest seam attacks. Also the top order look full of runs - Key MvJ, Denly, Walker, Stevens, and Jones will be with them all season They bat down to 11 with a spinner in Tredwell who has attracted the selectors for the one dayers. I for one will keep a copy of your post and enjoy showing it to you and reminding you in September just how wrong your predictions were.

  • 4.
  • At 11:52 AM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Kurt wrote:

Did I just read Kabir Ali, Matthew Hoggard and Steve harmison in the same sentence? Surely not!

  • 5.
  • At 12:04 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Mark Gracey wrote:

I agree. I thik Kents prospects for pushing into the top three in the county championship look promising. with that mixture of experince in Mahmood, Saggers, Walker etc, with the raw young talent of Denly and Tredwell. Led by Key, and with Jones behind the stumps, a very exciting season beckons, both in the CC and in the twenty20 again.

  • 6.
  • At 01:15 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Adam Hildred wrote:

Notts will be OK. With Sid and Broad available at the start we'll pick up lots of points. Broad won't play all the Tests. AJ Harris and Paul Franks are steady enough reserves and if he can stay injury free, Footitt might start showing his potential. We'll start strongly but fall away to mediocrity I think...

Not sure about your Somerset prediction, their bowling is already quite weak and will be exposed unless Caddick is fit enough to play every 4 day game.

  • 7.
  • At 01:43 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • John D Traynor wrote:

You dismiss Surrey? They have Saqlain Mustaq, who, if fit, will be devastating. Perhaps you're assuming he'll be playing for England all summer?

  • 8.
  • At 03:01 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Tom wrote:

Watch out for Somerset's young leggie munday. He took 10 wickets against Notts in the title deciding final game of the season. If he gets game time he could be a revelation.

  • 9.
  • At 03:16 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Barnaby Dowling wrote:

Didn't see Gloucestershire mentioned. I wonder why.

  • 10.
  • At 03:41 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Sam wrote:

I'm not so sure about writing Hampshire off. True both senior spinners have left the club but there was always more to the bowling attack. With wicket taking all-rounders in the squad as well as Bond bolstering the bowling i think that Hampshire will overcome the loss of Warne. While maybe not pushing for the title this season they should finish mid table

  • 11.
  • At 03:57 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Andrew wrote:

Yet another pundit who dismisses Hampshire chances!

Warne wasn't at his best last year and with Bond, Watson and maybe Vettori as our overseas player this season, a batting line-up that have potential and an exciting homegrown bowling attack (Dawson/Griffiths/Tremlett) I believe we may well shock some people

  • 12.
  • At 05:05 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • Simon Davison wrote:

How can you dismiss surrey!!! With Saqlain back.... He carried the team when he was with us before and i believe he will do it again! I cant wait to see him reake havoc on visiting teams again. One of the greatest servants surrey has ever seen. As for other bowlers im intrigued to see how chris jordan will come along this season and how pedro collins will do especially after turning down the chance to tour with the Windies again. As we saw from last year Nicho could be devestating and i cant wait to see him in action again!!

As for the batters Ramps will give 110% as always and will have his 100th 100 by the middle of may. The other batters will have to Ramps but i cant see why Butch and the rest cant do that!

Surrey have a great team ethic and will do well in all forms of the game. At least the semis in 2020 and will will be in the top 3 for the county championship. The 1 day game is their weakest area but i can see them coming along this year and will be promoted to the 1st division in the pro 40 and maybe come 2nd or 3rd in their group for the friends provident cup!! Good Luck Surrey.

With Harmison, Plunkett, Onions and the massively underrated Mark Davies, Durham have got a pace attack and then some.

If they can put runs on the board, I think they're in with a shout.

  • 14.
  • At 08:16 PM on 15 Apr 2008,
  • John wrote:

As a complete nutral I think the pundit is right in his assessment. I think it will come down to the two best teams in the country - Sussex and Lancashire. Lancashire always seem to play second fiddle to Sussex and I don't see the situation changing this season.

  • 15.
  • At 12:19 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Edward wrote:

I am a Lancs fan and I believe we are mediocre.

Far from being title challengers I reckon we may have a relegation battle!.

We have failed, yet again to bring in players of quality. We rely too much on the oldies Loye and Law and they will not be around for ever.

My tip for the title is Durham actually. Unless England pick their bowlers.

  • 16.
  • At 03:29 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • David Brennan wrote:

Thank God that real cricket is starting again

First class cricket has been around for centuries-it has lasted longer than the 50 over game and will last longer than the Indian Cricket League especially once the novelty is gone.

Real cricket lovers-do not panic

  • 17.
  • At 09:11 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Steven Bennett wrote:

I agree with David Brennan, i really feel that the county season should be supported by as many people as possible this season in the light of the ICL. It's the core of cricket and has so much History. I do believe that any English players who play in in the ICL should automatically be ruled out of Englands Test Team - for good. It's no surprise that Michael Vaughan is not against it. I say, Michael, if you want your pay day, along with all the other ageing pro's on the county circuit, be my guest. I question the source of motivation of those players who seem to be drawn by the money.
As for the county season, i just hope that it's very competitive and that the overseas players don't dominate. Let's have some young Englishmen putting in match winning performances.

  • 18.
  • At 09:15 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Graem Peters wrote:

Given the quality of some of the other seam attacks in Division 1, it is hard to understand how Sussex can compete. Apart from RMJ, all the other seamers have a lot to prove. I suppose winning becomes a difficult habit to break. Looking at the 'ins' and 'outs' of the various counties, Sussex and Surrey have in effect done a spinner swap; Saqlain goes to Surrey and Hamilton-Brown goes to Sussex. If I was a Surrey supporter I would not be best pleased.

  • 19.
  • At 10:04 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • kevin Howells wrote:

Hello,
It's Kevin Howells here at the Oval.
Here we go again.
Start delayed on the first morning due to wet outfield.
Anyway I'm writing to make clear that my meagre offerings for the season, penned before last weekend to come, penned before the weekend have already changed since finding out this morning that Derbyshire won't now see Jayawardena at any pointin the summer.The challenge is dealt a big blow.
But still good luck to John Morris and Ricki.
A good start and who knows what might happen.

  • 20.
  • At 10:21 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Kevin Howells wrote:


Given the delayed start here at the Oval and a moment to read the messages.
I seem to have only upset Kent so far.
So I look forward to my next trip to Canterbury where I'm certain to witness a thumping home win.

  • 21.
  • At 10:55 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Stu wrote:

David Brennan I think you are a very optimistic man, things like the IPL will be here for a long time yet!

Although I'm no expert I would suggest that the majority of clubs (especially ones who do not host test matches) will now rely on 20/20 to make a profit every year.

Having been to Sussex for several of those packed games last year it is clear that it will draw in more than just your cricket enthusiast because of the fast paced, short time period.

Young people nowadays don't have time to spend 7 hours a day, 4 days a week watching the County Championship.

4 Day cricket will probably always be there for the purists but the clubs cannot afford to be without 20/20 now!

  • 22.
  • At 11:29 AM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Matthew wrote:

I think you have overlooked Kent and given no credence to the fact that they are the only team to have always been in the first division. If Khan is fit, they will bat down to number 11 and will be very hard to beat.

Also, why should Warwickshire never have been relegated? They had an average attack and batsman who are strokemakers that got found out. Which team should have been relegated last year then?

  • 23.
  • At 12:06 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Ben wrote:

Kent 15-4 currently!

  • 24.
  • At 12:07 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Joe Cooke wrote:

From a Sussex fan, i go with my heart and with my head, 3 years running looks to be the most likely outcome of the forthcoming season for division 1.

Little has changed from the championship winning teams over the past 2 years, new aussie Harris looks to be the top-class seamer needed to fill in the big hole left by the match winner which was Rana. The ever better Luke Wright looks to be a vital part of not only the one-day side at sussex but the four-day team this season. Again, Prior is harshly back from England duty and will score alot of runs for Sussex this year, whether he has the gloves or Andrew Hodd gets a chance he so deserves after stepping in last season and even bettering Priors huge contributions to Sussex.

The only concern at Hove for me will be the opening partnership, after Montys departure, Hopkinson and Nash will needed to be on form all season, to make up the excellent work that Monty did for many years at No1. This year round, the Sussex faithful will be looking for more consistent contributions from Yardy. However Adams, Mushy and Goodwin will be as special as ever.

Personally, i think Lancs will be the only major threat to Sussex's Hat-Trick, however with Yorkshire, Somerset, Surrey and Durham all fighting for what looks to be third place, this county season will be as exciting as ever.

Enjoy!

  • 25.
  • At 12:42 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Ray Smith wrote:

Post 2 Lef:

"Hampshire squad always overrated"??

Internationals: Warne, Udal, KP, Dimi, Crawley, Pothas, Tremlett, Carberry (A Team)...

look out for Lumb to step up this year.

not sure that was overrated? however, with the loss of Warne and Udal it will be a tough ask this year.

Look out for home grown talent though instead of Kolpack players.

  • 26.
  • At 01:41 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Steven Bennett wrote:

I can understand why 20/20 is considered important - it brings in money for clubs to survive and gets kids involved in cricket, which is good. But, like the 50 over game, it's not cricket at it's highest level (that's 4 day and test cricket). I personally would ditch 20/20 AND 50 over games and have 30 overs per side. Of course that would reduce the number of games played, which means less revenue, so that won't happen. Not too long ago there used to be sporting occasions, now we have a so called 'big game' almost every day, making the sport, as a whole, fogettable.
The name of the game seems to be just money at the moment, with talk of 'market forces' and 'stupid not to take double the money'. I will be taking no serious interest in 20/20 in any form - why? because it's American style garbage - diposable. Stu, you say that young people don't have time these days for longer forms of the game. Well, that's because the world has become run, more and more, by the greedy suits who seem intent on spoiling everything, including cricket, it would seem. Forsight, long term thinking and morals are now below money on the list of what's important - and that, i'm afraid, is the beginning of the end.

  • 27.
  • At 01:51 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Steven Bennett wrote:

I can understand why 20/20 is considered important - it brings in money for clubs to survive and gets kids involved in cricket, which is good. But, like the 50 over game, it's not cricket at it's highest level (that's 4 day and test cricket). I personally would ditch 20/20 AND 50 over games and have 30 overs per side. Of course that would reduce the number of games played, which means less revenue, so that won't happen. Not too long ago there used to be sporting occasions, now we have a so called 'big game' almost every day, making the sport, as a whole, fogettable.
The name of the game seems to be just money at the moment, with talk of 'market forces' and 'stupid not to take double the money'. I will be taking no serious interest in 20/20 in any form - why? because it's American style garbage - diposable. Stu, you say that young people don't have time these days for longer forms of the game. Well, that's because the world has become run, more and more, by the greedy suits who seem intent on spoiling everything, including cricket, it would seem. Forsight, long term thinking and morals are now below money on the list of what's important - and that, i'm afraid, is the beginning of the end.

  • 28.
  • At 03:53 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Lef wrote:

Ray Smith - KP has never played a Championship match for Hampshire! Warne and Udal are no longer there, Carberry and Lumb have only recently joined, Tremlett is injury prone and your captain Dimi is playing the IPL for some of the season.

Also, I use the word 'overrated' because Hampshire have been one of the favourites to win the title for the past couple of years - something they've never achieved.

  • 29.
  • At 04:07 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Joe Cooke wrote:

As as Sussex Fan, i have to back a team which has a habit of winning, with little changes to the championship winning teams from the last 2 years, 3 in a row looks to be the most likely outcome for division 1.

New Aussie Harris looks to be the top-class seamer we needed to fill the big hole that was left by the match winner that was Rana. The ever better Luke Wright looks to be a vital part, of not only the one-day team at Hove, but Sussex's Four-Day team as well, a great performance against England 'fringe' bowlers playing for MCC looks to be positive signs for Sussex fans. The opening partnership, of what looks to be Hopkinson and Nash, will need to be on form all season to make up for the departure of the ever reliable Monty. With Prior harshly back from England duty, he will score huge runs for Sussex this year, wether he is given the gloves or Andrew Hodd gets the chance that so deserves after stepping in and producing some match winning performances last season. Again, Adams, Mushy and Goodwin will be as special as ever.

Personally, i think that Lancs will be the only threat to Sussex's Hat-Trick, however with teams like Yorkshire, Surrey, Durham and Somerset fighting for what looks to be third place, this county season will be as exciting as ever. Enjoy!

  • 30.
  • At 04:12 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Joe Cooke wrote:

Murray Goodwin wil get 150 tomorrow, Sussex to post 450 in their first Innings!

  • 31.
  • At 04:13 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • Joe Cooke wrote:

Murray Goodwin wil get 150 tomorrow, Sussex to post 450 in their first Innings!

  • 32.
  • At 04:15 PM on 16 Apr 2008,
  • David Brennan wrote:

Stu

Of course 20/20 is here to stay but I think 20/20 will have more of a detrimental effect on 50 over cricket than on First Class cricket.

The popularity of the ICL will wane over time and the novelty will diminish.

I just hope the ECB do not have a knee jerk reaction and radically change the first class structure.
Our wonderful first class structure has survived the one day game revolution, the Packer circus, Rebel tours-no reason why it will not survive the ICL.

This post is closed to new comments.

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.