³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - View from the South Bank
« Previous | Main | Next »

Creative Scotland

Pauline McLean | 15:08 UK time, Thursday, 2 April 2009

Culture minister Mike Russell may have laid to rest speculation about the cost of Creative Scotland but he's left many questions hanging in the air.

In his statement to parliament this morning, he confirmed the new body, which will merge Scottish Screen and the Scottish Arts Council, will cost £3.3m to set up - with at least a third of that figure going towards redundancies at the existing organisations.

Other costs include rebranding the new body - £75,000 - and retraining new and existing staff although since both organisations' headquarters are being retained, there are no overheads in that area.

The money won't come from the existing organisations' budgets (although they've already footed the bill for the initial £700,000).

Instead, it will come directly from the Scottish government.

And while that will no doubt come as a relief to the artistic community, it's still a lot of money, particularly in the midst of a world wide recession.

Mr Russell - who admits he wasn't always won over by the idea - says he believes the resulting organisation will live up to expectations.

"It's a long term investment," he said, "it'll be another 12 to 18 months before we'll see what has been achieved."

Opposition MSPs and artists who signed the 400 name petition earlier this year, calling a halt to the transition, are less convinced.

"It's the old adage - don't fix what ain't broke," said artist Janie Nicoll, "you have to question why they feel the need to spend so much money on two organisations which are doing a reasonably good job of what they do. £3m is a lot of money, wherever it's coming from."

There are, of course, plenty of people who believe both organisations need a radical shakeup - but once again it raises more questions than it answers.

Will the new organisation offer loans instead of grants? Will it be based on the exisiting committee system? Will the costs rise in the year ahead? and will the body even be given the go-ahead, having failed to be voted through in a previous piece of legislation?

That question, at least, may be answered in the next month or two when the Public Services Reform bill is considered in parliament.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 2.

    There seems little point in merging these organisations, while retaining both HQ's, UNLESS some new managerial blood is brought in at the highest levels.

    Only with a more cost-efficient bureaucracy with clear aims (which are regularly reviewed), can any sustained and effective improvements be achieved.

    No one would expect the new body to make a profit. All they need to do is obtain good measure per bawbee !

  • Comment number 3.

    Come on, Pauline.

    With Brian's Blethers suspended because of the Holyrood hols, we need more flavoursome output from your good self.

    Happy Easter.

Ìý

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.