All the print that fits
More than ten million newspapers have been sold across the UK today.
I can't know that, of course - it's merely a reliable guess.
But the industry is close to the Sunday total falling through that level, as daily papers have already done.
Ten million sales still represents a lot of paper, to be sure, but the rate of decline in sales isn't letting up. And some Sunday papers are showing the pressure.
For the Sunday Herald - based in Glasgow, with the smallest circulation of any title classified as 'national' - the latest industry circulation figures are particularly alarming.
It relaunched in January, and saw a couple of weeks of healthy sales as customers tried out a single-section magazine design.
But those customers have fallen away fast. Its February sales were 23% down on February last year, at only 33,000.
Why? My hunch is that a Sunday paper that can't be separated over the brunch table (particularly the sports section) is much less attractive to readers and less conducive to household harmony.
Spat sparked
The sharp fall has sparked a spat between the Sunday Herald's editor, Richard Walker, and the group editor at The Scotsman/Scotland on Sunday in Edinburgh.
Richard Walker laments the impact of Scotland on Sunday marketing aggressively, with reduced price in the west of Scotland, to exploit the Sunday Herald's weakness.
He points out the result could be that the overall indigenous Scottish press will be the victim of such tactics.
John McLellan at SoS responds that's pretty rich coming from a Glasgow paper that lowered its price to non-viable levels for much of last year. You can read more about it at the website.
They're both right, but the tenor of the spat suggests that The Scotsman group, owned by Johnston Press, scents blood from its rival, and has no qualms about trying to kill it off.
Cost-cutting cycles
But the Sunday Herald isn't the only one crashing through previously unthinkable circulation thresholds.
With the once-mighty Daily Record now selling below 300,000 in Scotland, the February figures show The Herald just above 50,000, and The Scotsman just above 40,000. Scotland on Sunday has sales north of the border of 53,000 - holding up better than the industry average.
Its other rival, the Sunday Times, has fallen through the 60,000 sales barrier since it ditched much of its Scottish content in one of the industry's relentless cycles of cost-cutting - though its Scottish decline has not been far off that of UK sales.
The most recent figures for the 'non-national' titles issued last month (they're only issued every six months) show The Courier down by more than 4% in a year to 63,000, and the Press and Journal down 3.5% at 73,000 for the second half of last year.
At 54,000 average daily sales, the Glasgow Evening Times continued to lose readers faster than other evening papers, with the Dundee Telegraph a rare case of putting on sales - up a few hundred to 23,000.
Most vulnerable
Johnston Press, owner of the Scotsman group, this week reported full-year financial figures with advertising revenue falling much faster than circulation, and accelerated by the cuts in government spending on ad space. So the newspaper nightmare goes on.
But for those fearing they look most vulnerable, one small beacon of hope comes from The Independent. It sells fewer than 200,000 copies across the UK, and fewer than 8,000 of them in Scotland.
But its fall in the past year has been much slower than its better-resourced competitors. And in Scotland, the daily and Sunday has actually put on (a few) sales.
Comment number 1.
At 13th Mar 2011, spagan wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 13th Mar 2011, X_Sticks wrote:Douglas,
Is it any surprise that the press in Scotland is in decline? For a newspaper to be succesful, it has to provide the readership what the readership wants, NOT what they think is good for the readership. And this is where the problem is in Scotland. There is NO Scottish press left. It is all under the ownership of foreign hands, and does not address the issues that the Scots want addressed. Instead they continually punt their "vision" for Scotland, and that is always a unionist vision.
An increasingly large percentage of the Scottish electorate no longer want the union. Many of us want an independent Scotland, free of the dead hand of westminster and UK politics. A press that continues to tell us that the union is best for us is going to continue to decline as the call for Scottish independence grows. At least a third of Scots no longer believe the lie that "We're all in this together".
The decline in Scottish trust in the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ comes from the very same reasons. The very least we require is honest, fair reporting. What will no longer suffice is the lies, spin, indoctrination and propaganda that have become only too evident in ALL the Scottish media.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Mar 2011, handclapping wrote:As I don't do newspapers anymore, I have to follow X_Sticks advisement on the matter. However DC Thompson of Dundee, though the family is strongly unionist, don't let their politics affect their papers. The cybernats rant on about how the P&J is a Labour mouthpiece but it appears that it is less biased against the SNP than others and this also follows for the Courier and the Sunday Post. Could this more level playing field for the SNP Scottish Government be the reason why the P&J and Courier are "only" down by 4% as opposed to the falls in our other "Scottish" titles?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 13th Mar 2011, EammonEccie wrote:Its hard to know which is cause and which is effect, and I dare say that falling sales and falling advertising revenue make it harder to produce quality. But all of that said the Herald and Sunday Herald are appalling at present. The Sunday Mail style book seems to have found its way in, and they are both littered with cheap, nasty and wilfully inaccurate or sensationalised stories. There is a dilemma here. Papers this bad and which treat their readers with such contempt deserve to fail, but it is hard to see what would replace them and we shall be left without an indigenous quality press before long.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 13th Mar 2011, The_Ex_Engineer wrote:A bit of consolidation in the newspaper business is rather overdue and badly needed, especially in Scotland. It does no-one any good to have lots of loss making newspapers.
FWIW the only paper that ever gets any money out of me is The Times. It also happens that most days I read The Scotsman, Telegraph, Independent, Guardian and even the Daily Mail, but do so on line for free. In terms of which paper has the correct online strategy, make of that what you will.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 14th Mar 2011, Wee-Scamp wrote:#3
I wouldn't call the P&J's editorial comment today on minimum pricing particularly even handed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 14th Mar 2011, dandydaz73 wrote:Both the Evening Express and P&J are terrible newspapers with bog standard journalism to blame. The sooner one, or both, go down the tubes the better.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)