³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - Sport Editors
« Previous | Main | Next »

Partnership and Focus

Post categories:

Roger Mosey | 13:00 UK time, Wednesday, 6 May 2009

From a talk delivered at the CCPR conference, 6 May 2009:

I want to concentrate today on two words: 'partnership' and 'focus'. Partnership is something you'll be hearing about a lot from the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ, and I want to explain what it could mean around the and Sport; while focus is what I believe we increasingly need as broadcasters - and and as - to deliver the Olympics in the best possible way.

We start in the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ from the principle that the licence fee is a unique privilege - bringing with it the responsibility to make every pound work for our audiences, and . It's been independently - nearly twice the value of the licence fee; and of that fully £5 billion is of benefit to the creative economy.

Gethin Jones interviews Warren Gatland for ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Radio 5 Live

That emphatically includes sport, and I'm proud as the outgoing director of sport that our team renewed so many of our major contracts and guaranteed the future on free-to-air television of , the , , and . Audiences expect top sport on the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ, and there's a clear benefit to society of having the biggest British events and winners available to all. It puts sport at the heart of ; and it guarantees involvement when those events are seen by millions. That's why we support the maintenance of listed events which help to ensure that major sport is available to all citizens.

But the commitment goes beyond that. I was delighted that we were able to do : there's a clear public service fit in offering higher profile coverage of the Football League, and in spreading the benefits of our rights investment. It dovetails with the way the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is now trying to spread the licence fee more evenly around the UK: everything from - an investment worth hundreds of millions of pounds - to last week's announcement that Sports Personality Of The Year will be broadcast from Sheffield. It's the latest stage of the journey that has taken us from a studio in Shepherd's Bush to becoming a flagship event for the regions, as anyone who experienced brilliant nights in and will know.

Then we offer coverage on our range of platforms to an array of other sports that are outside the more predictable diet of football. Some are the obvious headliners like this year's , and . But we'll also have white-water canoeing on ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ One at the end of the month; there'll be the European championships; and extensive coverage of the . I know my successor as director of sport, Barbara Slater, is keen to see how we can maintain and expand the breadth of that portfolio.

That fits into what I'll be doing around the Olympics: making sure that we work closely with the various sporting bodies involved () - and, of course, with the other main stakeholders such as , , , and all the commercial partners too. There will clearly be a significant investment of the licence fee around the Olympic Games of 2012, but it's more than just about money: our partnership agenda overall is about the way we can work with people in fresh ways, the aim that we transcend former rivalries to produce real value for the creative industries and for the UK.

Sir Steve Redgrave, Dame Kelly Holmes, Amir Khan, Jonathan Edwards at IOC 2005 assessment of London

So we know this is an unprecedentedly tough commercial environment. We know there's . But we believe in the broadcasting sector that the licence fee is a major part of the solution: a strong ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is a guarantor of strong British content and of investment in vital sectors like sport. For the Olympics, we will offer thousands of hours of coverage on a multiplicity of platforms and devices - giving sport its best ever showcase, and driving the use of new digital services in the year of analogue switch-off. Just , we want to celebrate British success; ; and give impetus to British innovation on the TV, on radio, online and on mobile.

To take just one example of that - of the Olympics in the UK increased by a factor of 13 between and Beijing in 2008. We led Europe in , and we had almost 40 million requests for content. Just imagine how that can expand even further by 2012, and how it has the potential to be the breakthrough moment for digital services that . The impetus comes not from our own imagination but simply from the needs of our audiences: it's what they're demanding, what they expect. And the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ - working in partnership with the Olympics, the sports of the UK and the digital creative industries - can help deliver it.

But I don't want to lose sight of the 'f-word': focus. None of this will be achieved if we have a scatter-gun approach, and it seems to me we're in a critical phase of the Olympic planning. - the battle against the odds to win the Games and the successful search for innovation in our bid. There was then, you might say, the barrier of Beijing: the fact that we had . Certainly in the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ it meant that between 2005 and 2008 we were planning much more for Beijing than for London. Well, now it really is us next. It's only just over three years to go; and for the broadcasters, for the organisers and for the country it feels like it's time to make our minds up. The decisions now are not about 328 things we might like to do; it's about what we're actually going to do. Prioritisation from amid the promises, hard choices emerging from the options that were kicked around in the past.

In the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ we have a simple prescription for what should emerge from this when we do the process internally. Fewer, bigger, better. Go for the events that show the real benefit of the investment of time and money; concentrate on those moments that the audience will remember because they're of high quality and demonstrable value. It's what I think should happen with the Cultural Olympiad - where we're also working with a range of partners - and it's just as relevant for sport.

And let me explain what I mean. It doesn't imply we should be any less comprehensive in our reporting: with our website now at the heart of our operation, and with digital radio and television services, there's more content than ever before. There's sports news, video and audio on around-the-clock, reaching 8 million or more people each week.

But for the breakthrough moments you need the right events and the right story to tell. Thirty minutes of perfectly-ok content on TV or radio once in a while doesn't put your sport into the national consciousness. What does shift opinions is the great event with the fantastic achievement or the memorable personalities: and that's not just something like . It's also the ; it's - and across the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ's services in Scotland and UK-wide, and in events like - well before the triumphs of Beijing; and it's by following our , and as they show us their commitment in programmes like , before they step out into the stadium at Stratford.

In other words, when we say that we want partnerships - and we do - there is just that one piece of conditionality about focus. . No-one has infinite resources and the choices sometimes will be about covering fewer things because we - and the industry in general - have to live within budgets and identify what's really a priority. But with 'fewer' comes 'bigger' and 'better' for the rest: using our range of services to reach the maximum number of people, spreading the word as widely as possible and getting more involvement around the landmark events.

There will be no bigger event in the UK in our lifetimes than the London Olympics, so we have that task squarely before us - and I've every confidence that we'll collectively rise to that challenge. The real question, and the area where we most need to work together, is how we build up to that summer over the next three years; and then how we capture the best of it and turn it into a legacy that will last. I can think of no better framework than a series of partnerships to deliver that; and I can think of no greater necessity than to make the choices soon about which ideas we'll back and what the best outcomes should be. We're ready to take that on, and we'd love to work with you to achieve a great result for this country.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    You might want to check the link for the white water canoeing in para 5. Either that or tell the BCU that one of their disciplines has changed somewhat. i do understand that you are meant to be showing some canoeing around that time though....assuming you work out what it is.

  • Comment number 2.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 3.

    what are the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ plans for the Commonwealth Games in 2010

  • Comment number 4.

    Partnerships are crucial.
    So why didnt the Beeb go for a partnership with Sky for the Cricket?
    Something could have been thrashed out.
    Still the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ do need to focus on how the Sports are brought.
    I hope Babera Slater keeps the focus , if she doesnt, it will be back to the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ in the 1990's...what everyone doesnt want.

  • Comment number 5.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 6.

    It seems strange the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ didn't use their long term relationship with Wimbledon to get this Sundays event to show off their new (rather hideous IMO) roof scheduled for Saturday instead, as this week there is nothing scheduled on ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ1 from 1pm-4.30pm, while Sunday is relatively packed.

  • Comment number 7.

    Thanks for the comments. I know colleagues in ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Sport will be reading what you say about current issues - and I'll be blogging again soon about the work we're now doing on the 2012 Olympics.

  • Comment number 8.

    I'm a cricket fan; therefore, this blog has no worth to me.

  • Comment number 9.

    In reply to coffeeandnan (post 8) "I'm a cricket fan; therefore, this blog has no worth to me."

    Actually the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ will be showing some cricket on TV this summer - highlights of the World Twenty20.

    For some unknown reason they seem to be doing their best too keep this a secret though.

  • Comment number 10.

    Yes I was wondering about that, when are the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ going to start talking about this cricket event it starts soon.

    Looking on the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Sport website there will be highlights shows every night on ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ2.

    I presume they will take in the ICC world feed commentary with Manish and Rishi sharing hosting duties.

  • Comment number 11.

    Any news on the scheduling of the 2020 highlights? Hopefully they won't be shunted around the late night schedules like the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ's other recent forays into cricket highlights.

    With the listing of events being reviewed this would seem to be an opportunity for the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ to put some pressure on by showing some sign that they are interested in scheduling cricket.

    Or they could reinforce the view that the schedulers see it as an irritation to be snuck out in the small hours.

  • Comment number 12.

    You really should have extended your partnership with FOM by showing GP2 instead of offering pathetic excuses for not showing it

  • Comment number 13.

    Some partnerships related to the olympics can become a problem for the cities chosen for the events. Eugene, Oregon was selected for the olympic trials. Nike, UO, and the city of Eugene are partners in that undertaking. This arrangement removes some of the checks and balances that normally exist in government. This Youtube channel explains some of the problems arising from these partnerships in Eugene. www.youtube.com/luddite333

  • Comment number 14.

    What's happening here? No blogs in weeks - and much missed they are too.

  • Comment number 15.

    I'm a great fan of the bbc - especially the radio coverage and I've been radio 5 / five live man for as long as the station has been in its' different guises.

    I was disappointed by the decision to allow Mark Saggers to leave as he is currently on Talksport doing all of the things which your own presenters don't do with anything approaching as much humanity, humour, intelligence and interest.
    How on earth can the opinionated boorishness of Alan Green be retained and someone like Saggers moved on ?
    Which Focus group / audience survey has generated this as an outcome ?

    Steve Wilkins

  • Comment number 16.

    I still remain a great fan of the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ. I am not disappointed in any change with regards to allowing Mark go.
    Afterall, change is inevitable.

Ìý

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.