³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - Graham Smith's Blog
« Previous | Main | Next »

Why do you read this blog?

Graham Smith | 15:54 UK time, Friday, 7 October 2011

As a relative newcomer to blogging (about 18 months now) I am still learning new gadgets. I recently came across which tells me how many readers I have, and - very roughly - where they come from.

The gadget tells me how many pages have been viewed, which kind of internet browser was used, whether readers arrived dreckly or via a search engine, and how long was spent on the site. I think that, technically, "reader" simply means "unique computer terminal" but it's good enough for me.

So I have now learned that this blog today has 1,969 "absolutely unique visitors" from almost every continent on the planet. Apparently I even have one reader in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Hi! Thanks for reading.) Provided the number of unique readers continues to increase, I'll report occasional updates. If it declines, I'll say no more about it.

Despite the wizardry, Google Analytics cannot tell me how many of this blog's readers are from Cornwall - although the vast majority are from within the UK. As part of my commitment to improving quality etc etc, I would welcome your thoughts about why anybody would read this blog. (I'm particularly curious if you're the guy in the DRC.)

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    I will be honest, I was drawn here when some English born freak CW kept trying to encourage people on c24 to attack your site, I read the comment and rather liked the cut of your jib. The downside is the moderation, which sees messages removed foe no logical reason. As you can tell my location is as I say and I am not part of any racist parties as the freaks would like to tell everyone and have nothing in common with antbod, a link created by an aussie and a person with mental issues.

  • Comment number 2.

    Correction - the last line of my comment does not suggest the Aussie does not not have any issues, he created the web site which saw the nats rounded up by the police, when he thought it clever to promote the lemon as a cornish gun runner, the truth hurts Chris.

  • Comment number 3.

    For me very much like Gaz, I had a look from reading what was said on this other forum, I thought anything must be better than a close shop set up.

    Being Cornish I like to see that the home fires are still burning, and freedom of choice is still available to all.

    The biggest turn off on here Graham in my opinion is the overactive moderating.

  • Comment number 4.

    My only complaint is that you are not posting enough. John Redwood manages at least one per day and he is probably busier than you.

    Oh yes, could we have an online decoder so I know what Saltashgaz is talking about?

    I live in Cornwall, although I am not Cornish. Just like about 60% of the people in Cornwall.

  • Comment number 5.

    backofanenvelope wrote:
    "I live in Cornwall, although I am not Cornish. Just like about 60% of the people in Cornwall."

    You are as Cornish as the next person if you wish to be.

  • Comment number 6.

    If I claimed to be Cornish just because I felt Cornish it would just mock those who are Cornish. In fact, I am Anglo-Irish. Living in Cornwall. I like it here and I would like those of us, Cornish or not, who live here, to have a lot more control of what happens here. But I don't want to live in a Cornish ghetto. My wife, who is Cornish, is quite happy to think of herself as British, English and Cornish.

  • Comment number 7.

    I live in Cornwall, although I am not Cornish. Just like about 60% of the people in Cornwall.

    backofanenvelope what do you define as Cornish, nobody controls where they are born. But we do have control of where we call home.

  • Comment number 8.

    Graham, it seems quite clear from some of the comments above why some read this blog.
    They are usually the ones who complain about the moderation, because they have either failed to read the house rules, or feel that they should be exempt from them.
    As for me, whilst I do not always agree with your viewpoint, you do seem to try to write as balanced a piece as you can, and dig away at that which you believe to be wrong.

  • Comment number 9.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 10.

    This comment has been referred for further consideration. Explain.

  • Comment number 11.

    Who are the Cornish? Those with at least 3 generations buried in the county!

  • Comment number 12.

    @backofanenvelope

    This is very interesting backofanenvelope. Does this mean if one of the parents falls within your category and the other one does not, does this mean their children will be half-breeds?

  • Comment number 13.

    no

  • Comment number 14.

    I thought as much, no one in their right mind would have thought differently.

    "One and All" United we stand, divided we fall.

  • Comment number 15.

    Who are the Cornish? Those with at least 3 generations buried in the county!

    I am one of those guys who thinks being Cornish is culture not a blood group. As YC said people are free to be Cornish if they wish, living or being born here are just two access methods - YC currently uses remote access as I am as I working away this week

  • Comment number 16.

    We'll just have to disagree. Is it OK if I choose to be a Martian rather than Cornish? I know I wasn't born there, but reading this stuff I wish I was.

    Mr Smith asked for comments on why people read his blog. Probably because they feel they are Cornish. Even if they are not.

  • Comment number 17.

    It works both ways, not everybody embraces the fact that they are Cornish or has any Cornish contacts. The old straw in the mouth image doesn’t go down very well in the city so I have been told.

  • Comment number 18.

    Perhaps people should read what Graham actually asked as I see no reference to the word Cornish, he asked how many are from within an English county called Cornwall.

  • Comment number 19.

    "So I have now learned that this blog today has 1,969 "absolutely unique visitors" from almost every continent on the planet."

    This shows how low the percentage is of people who actually post on this blog.

    So for those who are content just to read and not post, Hi! From yc.
    It is not easy sometimes folks getting through the minefield of moderating but we get there, perhaps you will have a go and post something, that would be nice.

  • Comment number 20.

    Perhaps Mr Smith could divide his readers into three groups. Cornish (have a bloodline); Non-Cornish (chose to live here and like the place and people); pseudo-Cornish (people pretending to be Cornish).

  • Comment number 21.

    minefield of moderating

    A valid observations which works both ways, most who do view the comments are doing so just to hide certain truths they find rather embarrassing, like my comment removed above pointing out the person moaning above my comments practices extreme censorship on the site he moderates. They use any game to hide the truth by claiming what people comment is private or personal when in truth it is a sanity check and exposing why we have more lurkers than people able to comment on topic. This also explains why I opt to use decoder rather them giving it to people straight.

    I think backofanenvelope tried but let the cat escape with his last comment, there are no pseudo-Cornish. That is a clear invention of the paranoid nationalist unpopular front who think anyone who is against the nationalists has to be uncornish. Wrong they hate the cornish being dragged down by a fringe movement

  • Comment number 22.

    Saltashgaz wrote
    "there are no pseudo-Cornish."

    I think some have gone a little bit further, inasmuch as they are trying to build or resurrect something from the past and make believe it is theirs for today. The so called Cornish language is a very good example, that with the sympathy card of the Cornish genocide, they have good reason so they believe, to fight the good fight.

  • Comment number 23.

    Oh them - The citizens of an imaginary Cornish Fantasy island which seems to be a epileptic mix of Kilts\duchy\kernow. Let them invent away at the end of the day the truth will out. Best example is when they brainwash each other that Cornwall is next to England and then start shouting down people or invent a national flag which has no history prior to 1900.

    The truth is the trump card which hurts them and they are now fighting one of the few outsiders who helped them over devonwall – self destruction all the way, best ignored or laughed at but not worthy of any serious consideration

  • Comment number 24.

    Perhaps one reason people read this blog is read the misguided, nonfactual, and politically (of the gutter variety) motivated comments that some contributors feel necessary to post here. It is such a shame that those few contributors feel the need to try to make every thread about the same topic, regardless of the topic of Mr. Smiths original post.
    For example, how many of the above posts actually relate to the simple question of "why do you read this blog"?
    Not many.

  • Comment number 25.

    It is also, probably, why there are so few contributors here.

    Well done "lads".

  • Comment number 26.

    For example, how many of the above posts actually relate to the simple question of "why do you read this blog"?

    Certainly none of yours FACT

  • Comment number 27.

    Graham Smith wrote
    "I would welcome your thoughts about why anybody would read this blog."

    If allowed to flow Graham it can be very entertaining, take this thread alone it just buzzes with what is going to come next, some postings are very predictable especially from our experienced moderator from across the way, but all in all I would say those who read this blog are very well satisfied, (watch them jump in now) unless you know differently Graham?

  • Comment number 28.

    Question, does writing the word fact, in capital letters, after a statement make it true?

    The billions of different forms of life on this planet were created by Intelligent Design, FACT

    Nope, not even the magic "FACT" word makes that true, still, that's 2 ridiculous ideas disproved in one sitting, cooool.

  • Comment number 29.

    (watch them jump in now)

    I would not expect Aesop's Fables. But he does hold the answer - Familiarity breeds contempt. Absolute ignorance trying to be clever yet failing hand over fist.

  • Comment number 30.

    Graham Smith wrote
    "Provided the number of unique readers continues to increase, I'll report occasional updates. If it declines, I'll say no more about it."

    Well there you are Graham, the loyal few who post have contributed their little bit to this thread, and I hope you can find something within that you can use for the betterment of this blog.
    Posters only react to what has been posted, which is a good thing, if only to get their true feelings out into the open.

  • Comment number 31.

    Posters only react to what has been posted, which is a good thing, if only to get their true feelings out into the open.

    Very good and moderating them only sees people looking for more devious ways of doing this

Ìý

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.