What do we think of K8?
Graham Smith | 09:50 UK time, Thursday, 18 November 2010
Jump to more content from this blog
For the latest updates across 成人快手 blogs,
visit the Blogs homepage.
You can stay up to date with Graham Smith's Blog via these feeds.
Graham Smith's Blog Feed(ATOM)
If you aren't sure what RSS is you'll find useful.
成人快手 漏 2014 The 成人快手 is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 18th Nov 2010, Andrew Jacks wrote:She is a stunning looking lady; I am 100% envious of our prince and want the royals to have learnt from previous ventures into welcoming commoners into the fold
Give the girl a chance; she will become a prize assets
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 18th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:Not a bit too 'council house' Andrew Jacks?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 18th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:Thank you Graham,
May I start by wishing this couple the very best of happiness that life can bring, and as Williams mother found out money cannot buy happiness.
But with Charles his father around to guide him through his difficult years (being a half orphan) he seems to have come through it OK, and should make a wonderful Duke of Cornwall when he takes over from his father and follows in his footsteps. Kate I do not know much about her, but she looks the part and should make a fine Cornish maid.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 18th Nov 2010, P_Trembath wrote:Good luck to them.
Although, with my cynical hat on, one can't help wondering about the timing of all this, with the cuts and everything. Nothing like a "good news" story to bury the bad. Something to take our minds of whats to come.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 18th Nov 2010, Dave the rave wrote:Best of luck to them, a handsome couple as Duke and Duchess of Cornwall would be a great earner for the county.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 18th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:Duke of a Duchy...
C....? of a 'county' ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 18th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:Prince Charles put the 鈥淐鈥 in Cornwall and heir to the thrown to boot, but now we have William and Kate coming along, this must be the icing on the cake, aren鈥檛 we lucky?
Don鈥檛 you just feel the excitement in the air already? Makes being on or off topic seem a load of fun LOL.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 18th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:dippydocious youngcornwall: 'Don鈥檛 you just feel the excitement in the air already?'
No. No more than for any other young couple - gay, straight, common as muck or ambidextrous....
Anyway, helicopters can fall out of the sky, youngcornwall, however specially they may be maintained.
You'd be unwise to get all caught up allowing the brainwashing mutually commercially parasitic hullaballoo to steer your dippydocious infatuations out of control.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 19th Nov 2010, dtrerise wrote:I couldn't care less about any marriage into a family notable only for falling out of the right vaginas.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 19th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:AccurateChronometer wrote:
dippydocious youngcornwall
What鈥檚 with this 鈥渄ippydocious鈥 then? Or is this the first dregs to bring this thread down to an unworkable position?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 19th Nov 2010, Tynegod wrote:Duchess Catherine of Cornwall.
Has a ring to it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 19th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:Yes, Slimslad - The Duke and Duchess of the constitutional territory The Duchy Of Cornwall which is NEXT to England, just like Scotland and Wales. Very good - you're getting there.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 19th Nov 2010, Rialobran wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 19th Nov 2010, TheCornishRep wrote:What do I think of Catherine Elizabeth Middleton? How can I possibly answer that having never met her and conversed at any length. Perhaps she is a charming, intelligent and witty individual but, on the other hand, perhaps not. Who knows except those close to her.
Please lets not get dragged into this media fed celebrity worship where image and artifice are god.
Surely this is an opportune moment to mention the excellent and fully referenced website from the Duchy of Cornwall Human Rights Association that explores the Duchies relationship with Cornwall and the UK:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 19th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:It certainly looks like it, TheCornishRep. Very topical:
The Duke and absentee landlord of the territorial Duchy Of Cornwall actually visited the sodden subjects of his Duchy of Cornwall today. Put on a jolly good show! Then flew off again in his chopper.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 19th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:Perhaps it's time to drag the constitutional institution that is the feudal Duchy Of Cornwall into the 21st Century - surely an embarrassment to the modern 'in this together' guy next door William 'Windsor' and future Duke - by the Privy Council and Parliament putting all of its assets and incomes into trust for the benefit of all the people of The Duchy of Cornwall rather than just one spoilt individual. Of course the incumbent Duke, whoever it may be from time to time, could always be chairman of the Board of Trustees Of The Duchy Of Cornwall Trust and Cornwall Council take over all the other legal and statutory functions and duties.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 21st Nov 2010, Rialobran wrote:Some marriage advice for Kate.....avoid Harrods and wear a seatbelt
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 22nd Nov 2010, Dave the rave wrote:Cornwall could live without the whole "duchy" concept, its an anachronism in the modern world. Perhaps, though I very much doubt, William would be so good as to give up the title "Duke of Cornwall" which will automatically be bestowed on him by right of inheritance. After all, who would give up a whole county for their dominion, to milk for cash? I wouldn鈥檛.
Cornwall county gains little at present from its royal association, the county would possibly be better off without it. Though the royals are good for pulling in the tourists. Mayhap the more handsome, and slightly less bonkers, younger couple, William and Catherine, will provide a windfall in Cornish tourism receipts.
Perhaps they are worth keeping after all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 23rd Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:How wonderful William and Kate will marry on Friday 29 April, and there will be a public holiday on that day. I don鈥檛 suppose there will be many who will turn their noses up to a day off will there?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 23rd Nov 2010, Dave the rave wrote:There is something nice I suppose that our county has it's own Duke so close to the Queen, her eldest son in fact.
This status is something which should be used and exploited for Cornwall's gains. Tourism being the obvious one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 24th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:What are you saying, Dave the rave - A Duke of a 'county'?
Surely it's the Duke of the Duchy.
As in, to be precise, the Duke of The Duchy Of Cornwall.
That's pretty clear, straightforward, proper, simple and correct.
How could you possibly have got so confused...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 24th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:Dave the rave wrote:
鈥淭his status is something which should be used and exploited for Cornwall's gains. Tourism being the obvious one鈥.
The timing of this wedding could be just what the holiday trade is looking for, an extended Easter break, the 26th 27th and 28th needs to be sorted, I am sure that will not be a problem.
See who this couple are going to invite to their wedding, bless them.
鈥淭hose likely to receive an invitation could include destitute teenagers from the homeless charity Centrepoint. The prince spent a night sleeping rough on the streets of London in support of their plight last year鈥
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 24th Nov 2010, Dave the rave wrote:Well, I thought the nationalists were opposed to Englishg rule in Cornwall. Now it seems AC is wantingt to have his cake and eat it.
Let's cerebrate our next Duke of Cornwall being wed, whatever, and our next duchess of Cornwall being announced.
A fine tradition since Edward III of England gifted Cornwall to his seven year old son (also Edward) in 1337 in order to provide an income for his heir.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 24th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:Perhaps, Dave the rave, The Duke of The Duchy Of Cornwall has never been much more than an self-invited guest in the Celtic Nation of Cornwall as a result of external territorially acquisitive presumption and imposition.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 25th Nov 2010, P_Trembath wrote:youngcornwall wrote:-
"How wonderful William and Kate will marry on Friday 29 April..."
How wonderful, a good day to bury bad news!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 25th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:P_Trembath wrote:
How wonderful, a good day to bury bad news!
Do we have a crystal-ball gazer in our midst or a wet-blanket?
April 29th will be a day to remember, street parties the lot.
I sure this wedding will help to heal the wounds that still exist with some over the loss of Princess Diana.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 25th Nov 2010, P_Trembath wrote:No crystal ball, and no wet blanket.
I have no wounds that need healing over the "loss" of a person that I did not know.
Do you really not find the timing of this event to be rather convenient. A government that finds itself, whether you agree with them or not, having to bring in a lot of, what are going to be, unpopular "cuts", that will cause a lot of people a lot of hardship. What better than all the pomp and ceremony of a Royal wedding to take peoples minds off the more unpleasant news that is going to be heading our way.
Lets have hours and hours of speculation in the news about what her dress will be like, who is going to be invited, the wedding presents, even what flowers they will choose, instead of reports of people loosing their homes. At least the kids will be able to remember a wonderful street party, and how they got sick eating too much jelly, before they were made homeless.
Instead of people talking about the rising cost of living, or how much fuel is going up, or the care home down the street that is having to close, they can now talk about this joyous event.
Isn't it nice to be able to give the masses something to feel good about, so they won't feel to bad about all the other **** that's going on.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 25th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:P_Trembath wrote
What better than all the pomp and ceremony of a Royal wedding to take peoples minds off the more unpleasant news that is going to be heading our way.
If you think that people are that easily hoodwinked, you got another think coming.
Let those who wish to enjoy this wedding with all its pomp and glory enjoy it, I say.
I would like to think this couple would be happy wherever they got married, even if it were down their local registry office, yes I know there are some who wish they would, but unfortunately they are caught up in the system like many others.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 25th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:They are not obliged to be 'caught up in the system, youngcornwall.
Anyone born into 'royal' position and privilege can choose to abdicate it and become and live as a modern 21st Century 'commoner' rather than live a life of dysfunction as a fairytale fantasy figure projection.
It's a 'free country'!
Isn't it?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 26th Nov 2010, Dave the rave wrote:1. Edward of Woodstock
(the Black Prince), son of Edward III
2. Richard of Bordeaux,
grandson of Edward III
3. Henry of Monmouth,
son of Henry IV
4. Henry of Windsor,
son of Henry V
5. Edward of Westminster,
son of Henry VI
6. Edward of Westminster,
son of Edward IV
7. Edward, son of Richard III
8. Arthur of Winchester,
son of Henry VII
9. Henry, Duke of York,
second son of Henry VII
10. Henry, son of Henry VIII
11. Henry, son of Henry VIII
12. Edward of Hampton,
son of Henry VIII
13. Henry Frederick, son of James I
14. Charles, Duke of York,
second son of James I
15. Charles James,
eldest son of Charles I
16. Charles, son of Charles I
17. James Francis Edward,
son of James II
18. George Augustus, son of George I
19. Frederick Lewis, son of George II
20. George Augustus Frederick,
son of George III
21. Albert Edward,
son of Queen Victoria
22. George Frederick Ernest Albert,
23. Edward Albert Christian George
son of George V
24. Charles Philip Arthur George,
son of Elizabeth II
25. Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales
son of King Charles
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 26th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:AccurateChronometer wrote
It's a 'free country'!
Isn't it?
Yes it is a free country, and this couple have chosen to go the whole hog, with all of the trimmings, and will go on to be great ambassadors for this country no doubt.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 26th Nov 2010, P_Trembath wrote:youngcornwall wrote:-
"If you think that people are that easily hoodwinked, you got another think coming."
YC, it's not "hoodwinking", it's attention diversion. And, yes, peoples attention is that easily diverted.
youngcornwall wrote:-
"Let those who wish to enjoy this wedding with all its pomp and glory enjoy it, I say."
Yes, let them, a spoonful of sugar is often most enjoyable.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 26th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:P_Trembath wrote:
Yes, let them, a spoonful of sugar is often most enjoyable.
Better than sourer-grapes any day.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 26th Nov 2010, P_Trembath wrote:I don't know YC, some of the best wine is made from sourer grapes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 27th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:youngcornwall, do you think Catherine Middleton will be entering the marital bed chamber for the very first time in royally suitable and 'Christian' condition for a bearer of the 'royal' line?
Or was that Bishop right all along?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 27th Nov 2010, youngcornwall wrote:AccurateChronometer Whatever the 鈥渃ondition鈥 she will be in, no doubt it will not suit everyone. Anyway it is recommended we look in our own eye first.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 27th Nov 2010, AccurateChronometer wrote:You're right, youngcornwall.
That's often a very good eye-dea.
It doesn't take narrowly monotheistic theological hocus-pocus to unveil that self-evident virtue to our view.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 11th Dec 2010, youngcornwall wrote:I hope this attack on the royals was just a one off incident, for this kind of hostility and demonstrations to carry on, or start up again at the royal wedding it would be very unfortunate.
/news/uk-11975280
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 12th Dec 2010, youngcornwall wrote:Didn鈥檛 they do well? The photographers that is, for capturing the genuineness of this couples love for one another.
/news/uk-11976352
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 13th Dec 2010, P_Trembath wrote:youngcornwall wrote:-
"I hope this attack on the royals was just a one off incident, for this kind of hostility and demonstrations to carry on, or start up again at the royal wedding it would be very unfortunate."
With today's communications, and, supposedly, one of the best Police forces in the world both protecting them, and "controlling" the protest, the question has to be asked, what the hell were they doing there?
Was it a "sight seeing" trip gone bad?
A complete cock up?
Or something more sinister?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)