Main content

The morality of forgiveness

Michael Buerk and his panel examine the moral case for forgiveness. Is it ever right to forgive serious crimes?

The Legacy Act in Northern Ireland provides a conditional amnesty for people who committed crimes during the Troubles, as part of a broader process of reconciliation. It鈥檚 an attempt to draw a line under events of the past, but it鈥檚 generated anger among the families of some victims, who feel they鈥檒l be denied justice.

When things go wrong, we need to find people to blame. Who鈥檚 responsible? Who should be punished? But might we do better if we were prepared to blame less 鈥 prioritising the truth, and forgive more? It's been proposed that the NHS adopts a no-blame system where staff don鈥檛 lose their jobs if they admit a failure, so the NHS learns quickly from its mistakes. The 鈥渘o-blame culture鈥 idea already exists in parts of the US aviation industry where people are encouraged, even praised, for owning up to mistakes that could cost lives.

If blame means disgrace and the end of a career, it鈥檚 hardly surprising that people hide the truth about their own failure. How many of us would admit it quickly, if we discovered that a mistake at work had led to terrible consequences? More forgiveness might lead to greater openness and honesty. It could make it easier to avoid mistakes being repeated. But is it moral to forgive serious wrongdoing? Where is the justice in that? Surely the fear of blame is a powerful incentive for us all to do our jobs properly and avoid mistakes. Do we need more forgiveness 鈥 or less?

Presenter: Michael Buerk
Producer: Jonathan Hallewell
Assistant Producer: Ruth Purser
Editor: Tim Pemberton

Available now

57 minutes

Last on

Sun 10 Mar 2024 23:00

Broadcasts

  • Wed 6 Mar 2024 20:00
  • Sun 10 Mar 2024 23:00

The Evidence Toolkit

The Evidence Toolkit

Check out the claims made in news stories with this interactive tool.

Podcast