成人快手

We鈥檇 probably all be able to give the government a score out of ten for its handling of the pandemic 鈥� but how many of us have even thought of subjecting ourselves to the same level of scrutiny? From illegal raves, house parties and large family weddings to the everyday decisions not to wear a mask or socially distance, how much should the public take a share of the responsibility for the spread of the virus? The author and commentator Matthew Syed claims that personal responsibility is 鈥渋n retreat鈥�. Citing a new drug to tackle obesity by hijacking the brain鈥檚 appetite-regulating system 鈥� while evidently good news 鈥� he cautions against the pernicious effects of easy fixes on human character and our sense of self. When a homeless person dies on the streets, many will view that tragedy as a 鈥渇ailure of the system鈥�, and it would be unpopular to suggest the cause lies, even in small part, with the individual. Yet, individual autonomy is today鈥檚 sacred creed and it鈥檚 argued that with rights come responsibilities. Others believe there is a flaw in that logic because, as the pandemic has shown, we don鈥檛 all have the same resources or enjoy the freedom to pursue our lives as we would choose; that we are all products of our social background and no choice is made in a vacuum. What has our response to the pandemic revealed about the value we place in personal responsibility compared to other countries and cultures? Have we made too much or too little of the idea? And what does this tell us about how we should be tackling all kinds of social issues? Does an emphasis on free will, choice and responsibility help us to understand them better, or can it obscure what鈥檚 really going on? With Prof Sally Bloomfield, Dr Alexander Brown, Dr Deepti Gurdasani and Prof Sir Michael Marmot.

Producer: Dan Tierney.