An explanation of DNRs, Do Not Resuscitate orders, and the guidelines followed by medical staff.
An explanation of DNRs, Do Not Resuscitate orders, and the guidelines followed by medical staff.
DNRs are Do Not Resuscitate orders. A DNR order on a patient's file means that a doctor is not required to resuscitate a patient if their heart stops and is designed to prevent unnecessary suffering.
The usual circumstances in which it is appropriate not to resuscitate are:
Although DNRs can be regarded as a form of passive euthanasia, they are not controversial unless they are abused, since they are intended to prevent patients suffering pointlessly from the bad effects that resuscitation can cause: broken ribs, other fractures, ruptured spleen, brain damage.
Guidelines issued by the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Nursing say that DNR orders should only be issued after discussion with patients or their family.
Although it may be difficult to have discussions with patients and their relatives about whether to revive or not, doctors accept that this is no reason why discussions should not take place.
The most difficult cases for discussion are usually those involving patients who know they were going to die, are suffering a lot of pain, but who could live for several months.
Dr Robin Loveday, a consultant says, "that is the situation where you really need a lot of discussion with the patient and their relatives to help them make a decision as to whether, if they do suffer a cardiac arrest, it is appropriate to have another go to give them a few more months of life."
The UK medical profession has quite wide guidelines for circumstances in which a DNR may be issued:
In the UK, NHS Trusts must ensure:
The clear guidelines on DNRs had to be firmly restated in 2000, after a number of seemingly healthy patients discovered they had 'do not resuscitate' or DNR orders written in their medical notes without consultation with them or their relatives.
There was further concern when it emerged that junior doctors had sometimes made DNR decisions because senior doctors were unavailable.
67 year-old Jill Baker found she had had a DNR order written on her medical notes without her consent. "She was understandably distressed by this as no discussion had taken place with her or her next of kin," said a doctor.
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ News 27 June, 2000
Age Concern warned that the UK's elderly feared they were at risk of not being revived simply because of their age.
Arguing that DNRs might be a form of ageism in the NHS, a spokeseman said "Age Concern will not rest until the 'writing off' of patients' lives on the basis of their age has been stamped out."
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.