UK law both requires and regulates experiments on animals. Any new drug must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal, one of which must be a large non-rodent.
UK law both requires and regulates experiments on animals. Any new drug must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal, one of which must be a large non-rodent.
UK law both requires and regulates experiments on animals.
Any new drug must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal, one of which must be a large non-rodent.
The way scientists can use animals has been controlled by legislation since 1822, and the law has grown much stricter since then. The Animals Act of 1986, for example, insists that no animal experiments be conducted if there is a realistic alternative.
Testing on animals now requires three ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Office licences - for the institution, the scientist and the project. They must outline the potential benefits and prove there is no alternative. Random inspections and on-site vets are mandatory.
The number of experiments has been broadly static for a number of years and is about half the figure in the 1970s.
NB: These figures are not complete and take no account of 'wasted' animals - animals bred for their tissues and then discarded or animals rejected because their genetic modifications did not work.
If these were included in the annual statistics, the figures for animal use would be considerably higher.
Experts believe the figures have now probably bottomed out.
They suggest that new classes of drugs now in development that act in very specific ways in the body may lead to more animals being used in future years, and to the use of more primates.
For example, as science seeks to tackle the neurological diseases afflicting a 'greying population', it is said we will need a steady supply of monkeys on which to test the safety and effectiveness of the next-generation pills.
Experts say the extremely specific way these novel pharma products will work means primates - because their brain architecture is very similar to our own - will be the only animals suitable for experimentation.
It's also possible that new EU proposals on the health and safety aspects of chemicals may also substantially push up the numbers of animals needed for testing.
The numbers of genetically modified animals used in UK labs continues to rise.
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Office statistics for 2002 show GM mice and rats were involved in 710,000 experiments, representing an 11% increase on the previous year.
Animal rights campaigners have criticised these official figures, claiming that they give little information as to how much the animals concerned suffer.
There are a number of alternatives to testing on animals. You can learn more about this at www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/animalexperiments/alternatives.shtml
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.