³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

« Previous | Main | Next »

LIVE LIVE LIVE

| 17:41 UK time, Tuesday, 10 April 2007

It's Christiane blogging again.

We're on air now - click here to listen.

Tonight we are talking about the final ruling by European Court of Human Rights in Natallie Evans attempts to use frozen embryos of her former partner. We are also talking about the situation in Darfur. Chadian troops engage Sudanese troops in Sudan. Last but not least we are having a debate about cyber-bullying. YouTube and other sites are being urged to get tough with the cyber-bullies that use their sites to make pupil's and teacher's live a misery.

Post your comment now.
You can read emails and text messages here, and of course post your own comments as well.

Linda in Malaga, Spain writes:

ONLY mother nature has right 2 GIVE motherhood. Why shld ex prtnr have 2 pay 4 child he doesn't want.

Jason in Portland, US writes:

It takes 2 to make a baby. 1 parent has just as much right as the other to choose that obligation of a child. she can adopt.

Bjay writes:

What about that poor child would born to this mess, out of selfish reason?

Davish writes:

Both parties have rights 2 make their own decisions although it may be tragic for oen the parties - it is fair & square. Laws are made to be abided not broken.

Howard in France writes:

If she had conceived naturally, the father would not have the right to force an abortion, so why does he have the right now?

Anonymous in Kenya writes:

Question for Natalie . .With so many destitute and orphaned children in the world, why is it so important to have a child with your own genes, particularly when those genes may pass on cancer?
Wouldn't you rather adopt?

Tokpa in Liberia writes:

The man has right to his sperm but let him donate the sperm to the woman. Remember she has right to her eggs.

Abdi in Kenya writes:

She shouldn't have gone to court but rather build on building a family and to continue to love each other till the end of time.

Ahamdi from Nigeria writes:

it's quite tragic for the lady. when the eggs were fertilized, both agreed to it.stretching ethics to the limit requires both to also be in mutual accord not to use the eggs. i feel the law gave unfair advantage to men in matters as this.

Brenda in Zambia writes:

Since the man is reluctant to hav children wit her, the decision is right.

Anonymous in Uganda writes:

Pity Nathalie's ex was selfish...had it been an African man he would only be too proud to give consent irrespective of their current status of relationship.

P. in Malawi writes:

Sarcastic court verdict which ignorantly okays abortion as the embryo- life at an early stage-was already a created life awaiting birth!

Paul writes:

If she wants a child and he refuses she can simply do the process wit hsperm from a different donor. I perceive she has a hiden agenda.

Philip in Zambia writes:

Whether sudan or chad,please fightin is affecting peace,economy and livelihood of both countries.please stop it fighting and focuss on developmental issues.bravo to those spearheading peace!!

Comments

  • No comments to display yet.
Ìý

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.