成人快手

World Cup 2006 Blog

From our reporters in Germany

Why England didn't deserve to win

LONDON - So, . England missed more penalties on Saturday (three out of four) than Germany have missed in all four World Cup penalty shoot-outs in which they've been involved (one out of 18. Who & when was that miss? Answer later.)

What exactly is it England have done to upset the footballing Gods so? Or do fans need to front up to the fact that yet again, despite the hype, the team just weren't good enough. Here's one view. But do you agree?

By Ben Dirs, 成人快手 Sport. This was a joyless World Cup. Joe Cole鈥檚 goal against Sweden apart, I can鈥檛 think of a single act by an England player that got the veins on my neck bulging or which led to beer raining down on me down the pub.
I鈥檓 not in the "winning is the only thing that matters" camp. Primarily, I watch sport, whether it鈥檚 darts or football, to revel in the skill and passion of its competitors. in Germany.
Which is why there won鈥檛 be effigies of Wayne Rooney hanging from the roofs of east London pubs this time around. England鈥檚 fans, primed for the fall, will sigh and shrug and return to the tedium of everyday life, having never been raised too far above it by this mid-range saloon car of a team.
Like a mug punter at an Essex car lot, I bought into the idea that this England team was the best in a generation before the tournament began.
But as it stuttered and choked its way through the group stages, bits falling off at every turn, it became clear that I'd been sold a Ford Mondeo tarted up to look like a Ferrari.
The , the and the strike force鈥檚 backend had gone before the World Cup had even started.
So when the end came, the depression wasn鈥檛 as acute as in previous tournaments 鈥 .

Comments  Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 01:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • heema wrote:

Completely agree. If with their 11 best players, England were no way near beating an under strength Portugal side for 60 minutes, it is a folly to assume that they would have done so in the next 30 minutes, with or without Rooney. At least, they went out with some dignity. Players are getting plaudits and all sins forgotten for an hour of defending against a pathetic Portugal attack. Ronaldo is now pulbic enemy number one, and spineless players got away with all the blame.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 2.
  • At 01:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Chris wrote:

I couldn't agree more.

No passion, no verve, no chance.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 3.
  • At 01:37 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Yas wrote:

Hey guys,

I know most of you probably won't be interested in football but I'm so Raging that I have to get this off my chest. I'm absolutely done as an England fan, what a bunch of soppy losers they are. Cowards who are more concerned with what latest hairstyles to sport. Don't be fooled by the tears on the pitch, they were really gutted by the fact that they have lost the potential millions from endorsements and sponsorships from winning the World Cup and the fact they could call themselves "Legends", ha ha ha!

The sorry excuse for a Captain was finished 2 years ago. Now don't get me wrong, back in 2000-2002, Beckham was a good footballer, not great, but led by example, which is a great way to motivate others. But the limp excuse for a footballer we see now should have quit way before this period. Now I'm sure if u watched the WC you'll be asking, wait we got to the Quarter Finals and its not that bad, but look who we played, the term "Also-rans" springs to mind, Pathetic!!!

Now this brings me to my major gripe....Sven Goran-Eriksson. This mercenary saw us coming a mile off. The idiot only knows how to talk in dollars and cents, and my god, he's got enough now to verbally recount, word-for-word War & Peace. A clown of monumental proportions, who if I had my way, would be placed in the stocks to be pelted with rotten veg! I hope we never see this creep again and I wish him all the misfortune for whichever mugs give him a job.

Phew, that was some major rant but I'm so disenchanted that I had to share it lol. Now I just have Newcastle United to support..... JESUS CHRIST!!!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 4.
  • At 01:37 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Superjim wrote:

go on then. put us out of our misery - who was it missed a german penno ?
I agree, in the end it felt inevitable, best it happened this way so we have something to focus on!
I'm backing SMcC to make the right changes that need to be made: a UEFA Final with unfancied Boro (no offence, smoggies!) is indication of his pedigree. 4-4-2, or 3-5-2 if we must start with 5 midfielders !

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 5.
  • At 01:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • M Ryder wrote:

What about Gerrards goal or Rooneys brilliance??
Also, what the hell dos Terry Butcher know about managing a national team, he cant even manage a club team well - & we should listen to him????? He shouldsort out his own house first....

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 6.
  • At 01:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Phil W wrote:

I think that the simple fact is we aren't good enough. All this "we have the players who can win it..." has some merit but I would question whether that is, in fact the case. One hears a lot of talk about "too many foreigners in the English game" but, personally, I would suggest that the opposite is the problem. i.e. not enough English players go to play abroad. With the exception of Beckham, Woodgate and Hargreaves I'm struggling to name anyone and it's a fact that the game is played and refereed differently away from the Premier League. Finally, I had to chuckle when I saw that Rooney has threatened to "Split Ronaldo in half"...Wayne me ol' mucker....THAT'S EXACTLY WHY YOU ARE A LIABILITY!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 7.
  • At 01:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Damian wrote:

Good to see the experts Terry Butcher and Chris Waddle having their say. Um, just what have the pair of you achieved as managers?
Yes Terry, we should all listen to you after your success with Motherwell. All you ever did was bandage your head. And as for Chris Waddle. How come there aren't subtitles when the man talks on tv? Translations for when he's on radio? It's incredible to think that some players who have broken english have subtitles when they speak but this man never does.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 8.
  • At 01:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Why the hype? wrote:

What I don't understand is why there was so much hype about the team prior to the world cup?

Why is there so much hype about Tim Henman all the time?

Why is it that every major sporting event that England enters is accompanied by a huge amount of hype followed by a huge amount of disapointment when the team doesn't live up to the hype?

You constantly set yourselves up for disapointment England.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 9.
  • At 01:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Paul Stephenson wrote:

Unlike the majority, i thought england had played well on Saturday before and after the sending off. We had the best of the chances and apart fro ma coupl eof Robinson flaps we never looked like conceding. Crouch played brilliantly when he came on and Ashley Cole was back to his phenomenal best and Owen Hargreaves showed the form which has made him such a regular at Bayern Munich.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 10.
  • At 01:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • ekow wrote:

A couple of reasons why England fail to progress far in competitions.
...they are crap at penalty shoot outs and their over pampered , hyped- up players like Rooney and Beckham are arrogant enough to throw tantrums .......until these two cankers are dealt with .. i am afraid the story will continue

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 11.
  • At 01:44 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Chris wrote:

I dunno about darts but my reaction to that article would have to contain a reference to nails being hit on the head. In other words, well said. But you don't say which dodgy salesman sold you the suspect motor. I hate to labour the point but the untrustworthy bloke in the blue suit springs to mind, aided and abetted by some unethical advertising - courtesy of the tabloid press.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 12.
  • At 01:45 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Superjim wrote:

additional, forgot to say:
we didnt start playing until we were a man down. we thought (at my place of work) we needed to go one down, but instead we got a man sent off. not good enough.
Sven once said "The biggest obstacle to success is fear of failure". hmmm. a bit freudian perhaps ? he was certainly afraid of losing the world cup, and it showed in his tactics, and inability to give either crouch, or walcott a cut and dried chance to make a difference. defence was like rock though. something for McClaren to build on!! onwards and upwards! optimism begins in the face of defeat !!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 13.
  • At 01:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Gman wrote:

Yes we are all disappointed. yes we are all heartbroken. but should we be surprised? i think its time for a bit of a reality check into what the England team really is. We are a nation in the Fifa Rankings top 10 - Top 10! We have not been in the Top 5 since, well you know when. i feel that 2 semi-finals, one final and numerous quarter finals in the last 40 years backs this up - we are a 2nd Tier team trying to reach the level of Brazil,Germany or Italy who it seems are always there or there abouts. By finishing in the top 8 of the World cup we are where we should be.
Yes we had possibly the best crop of players this country has produced in a long time with the right blend of youth & experience but when it came down to it the majority of them could not perform when it mattered. is this the fault of Sven? i'm not so sure. Chances were created in all games and they were simply not taken - Owen, Rooney & Lampard great players all did not take them and England scraped through the group, beat an average Ecuador and lost out to a Portugal side without 2 of their most influencial players on penalities. on the flip side of that coin is the defence and Keeper who deserve praise for being as solid as any left in the tournament, possibly better. And yet Sven does not get any credit for putting that together - strange.
in conclusion i feel that England should not go into any tournament expecting to win. the fans should show some inteligence and realise there are better teams (maybe not better players) and that the size of an English premiership players wages does not guarantee any trophy. and it never will do.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 14.
  • At 01:48 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Lynden Hall wrote:

Ben, completely agree with you, I had fallen for the spin too, how many times were we told the next game we will show how we can play, after Ecuador I said I cant be bothered with this, I still watched on Saturday, I had this hope deep inside that England will do it, they're in second gear I said to myself, "Come on England we'll show them" still there was no hunger to go out and make a mark "we're here to win it", I have followed England all my life and never have I felt so annoyed by it all, we had a overpaid overrated Manager, along with overpaid under achieving misfits of players, no doubt Rooney's mistake will be covered over by the news papers going out to get Ronaldo. At the end of the day, we were all excited by it all, but we need to have a reality check. My player of the Tournament was Owen Hargreaves, how many miles did he runn on Saturday and he still scored a penalty!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 15.
  • At 01:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • ian wrote:

The correct answer re the German penalty misser was Ulli Stieleke in Spain in 82 in the infamous Germany vs France game.

Remember Harald Schumaker and his "Jackie Chan" attack on Patrick Battiston?

As to Steve Mclaren please don't get me started on that subject! Let's just say he has been Sven's no. 2 and where has that got us?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 16.
  • At 01:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Oliver wrote:

Answer to the little trivia:

Stielike (played at Real Madrid) has missed a penalty in 1982 versus France.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 17.
  • At 01:53 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • awksquawk wrote:

Problem is we only start playing when under the cosh. Go a man down and facing an uphill struggle we can battle, tackle, fight hard etc...only thing is, is that to win a World Cup it rather helps if you can play football as well! We need to face facts that the overpaid, underworked ponces who are the players in the top eschelons of the Premier League think they are better than they actually are and the fans have swallowed this crap hook line and sinker. Until we realise that just because Lampard is paid 拢100,000 a week it doesn't make a decent player. Scoring goals week in, week out against Sunderland, Wigan and Bolton does not make him anything other than a very average player by world standards.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 18.
  • At 01:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rob wrote:

The 成人快手, along with the FA, have hyped England's chances for years and is therefore partly responsible for the nation's unrealistic expectations of a very average set of players.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 19.
  • At 01:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Phil W, what you fail to realise is that English players have no need to play abroad, as the Premiership is the greatest league in the world. Obviously La Liga is excellent, but why move your family to foreign soil when you're happy in England.
The 3 players you have mentioned are all questionable, even Hargreaves position in the squad, who had a storming World Cup wasn't definate until the last minute.
Beckham hasn't ran with the ball at his feet for years, and Woodgate, even if fit it dodgy to say the least.
All in all I think we did well, a bit of guts in the dressing room and we could have done something special, although tha has been missing since Sven took charge, which is unfortunate really as I beleive he is a good coach.

As for Rooney, the boy was being drag around for 10 seconds before, watch it real time, you can see that it's just the media ripping him apart for no reason. Thats what we have to live with.

If you had watched Rooney over the course of the season you would have seen a dramatically changed lad from the past, his disipline has been fantasic in the second half of the season and in my opinion his temperament is not an issue anymore.

Good luck to him, not that he needs it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 20.
  • At 02:02 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DAVE wrote:

I agree with the comments made. England were hyped up by the media and the management of the team. What has been even worse has been the digraceful treatment of Christiano Ronaldo.

The referee could not have been closer and must have clearly seen what Rooney did. Ronaldo had every right to be upset about it. If it had been Figo crunching John Terry in that area, the England players would have been incandescent with rage. The red card was correct and Rooney has no-one to blame but himself.

Prior to the start of the world cup Eriksson was lined up as the fall guy. After Saturday it became Ronaldo. Eriksson deserves blame for selecting too few strikers and taking a player he had no intention of playing. These 2 things forced him to change the formation to have one striker up front and we all saw what happened. He is also to blame for playing Beckham when he was out of the game for long periods and has no pace. Lennon made an immediate impact each time he was brought on.

Not good enough and a poor world cup especially considering a highly favourable path all the way to the semi-final. Portugal were very poor but they do have Deco and Costinha to come back.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 21.
  • At 02:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • mick faver wrote:

It is so hard to come to terms with as an England fan. It seems that this sort of disappointment is almost our destiny.

The fact is, though, we DO have a set of players capable of winning a major competition. We DON'T have a management team with the skill set to support them. In 2004 we went out of the competition because Sven was incapable of changing his tactics with the changing demands of the game (firstly against France, then against Portugal). He, once again, failed to read the situation in Germany. No strikers, bad formation etc. etc.

Unfortunately this is unlikely to change with Steve MacLaren. With both 'Big Fil' and Martin O'Neil expressing an interest in the position one can only hope that MacLarens tenure is short and painful and we can then purge ourselves of this inadequate 'management team' once and for all.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 22.
  • At 02:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Phil W wrote:

Hi Dan,

Well I would question if that is correct. It rather depeneds how you are measuring "the best league in the world". For entertainment certainly, for technical ability and quality? Perhaps but I don't think our players have any experience of refereeing and alternative styles of play due to their reluctance to move abroad. And, of course as you say, why should they? They are paid very nicely thank you very much for staying put...but is money the only motivation?

As for your statement "his temperament is not an issue any more" I'll put that down to the heat...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 23.
  • At 02:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Why the Hype wrote:

I think it's partly unrealistic expectation brought about by hype but on the other hand if you constantly tell a player he's the best in the world at what he does he's going to believe it. Not a good attitude to take with you into training.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 24.
  • At 02:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • paul wrote:

Best of a generation? No way!
did anyone else see the series of passes that went straight out over the side lines or straight to a portugal player. When they needed to walk the walk all we got was talk. premiership= overpaid and overhyped!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 25.
  • At 02:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dams wrote:

England crashed out of the World Cup mainly because of their inept manager. 拢25M pounds has gone into Ericsson's bank account from the English FA and they've not come close to getting value for money.
He brought the wrong squad (six players never kicked a ball yet he was screaming out for another striker). He refused to drop Frank Lampard despite the player being off form. That would have allowed Beckham to step inside and release Gerrard and introduce Lennon on the right side where his short appearances looked the most threatening weapon within England's atrillery.
Lampard with 24 efforts on goal forcing nothing more than routine saves should not have been first up at the crucial spot-kicks.
England's football did not merit them getting beyond the last eight and I cannot help but be convinced that a handful of Premiership managers would still be in Germany if they had been in charge and never shirked the big decisions like dropping Lampard.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 26.
  • At 02:12 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Richard wrote:

My reaction to our exit was 'disapointed but not surprised'. Mentally and physically, as a team, we were just not good enough to take the opportunity that this tournament presented. There are 2 key reasons behind this.

1. Celebrity Culture: The better (I use the word advisdly) England sides are always the ones with a no nonesense air about them. Erikson has been in thrall to the glamour that follows our top players and found it too difficult to drop them for the good of the team. Instead of picking the players to suit a system , not necesarily the best ones, he did the reverse and tried to squeeze too many individually good players into a side that clearly was not functioning. The results are there to see.

2. Foreign Domination of our top clubs: Before the tournament began, the great Johan Cruyff was asked to give his assessment of Spain's chances. He said that Spain's top clubs are so dominated by foreign players that Spanish players (only 2 in Barcelona's European Cup side) were a minority, ultimately undermining the national side. So it proved. He also said that England was heading the same way and its true. Of our squad, 3 each are in the Chelsea, Liverpool, and Manchester United first teams respectively. Its more than a coincidence that La Liga and the Premiership are the 2 most dominant, cosmopolitan leagues in the world but produce under achieving national sides.

Steve McClaren can address the first reason with some hard nosed selectorial decisions and banning the WAGS from the camp in future tournaments.

Regarding the second reason, with our top 4 clubs coached by a Potuguese, a Scot, a Spaniard and a Frenchman respectively, whose loyalty is understandably not to our national side, McClaren is powerless to act.

We are and will remain a quarter final team.

Lets accept it and start revising our expectations downwards from now on.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 27.
  • At 02:14 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • tom dobbie wrote:

It seems that there are three distinct camps in English football;-

1. The Beckham show - a media mockery.

2. The "we are great tribe" - like supportesrs of George Bush, they never see the terribly obvious wrongs.

3. The grumbling core who can see the king is wearing nothing.

If England ant to be a great football team, then they should create and empower great footballers - not just chant the hype of the media clowns.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 28.
  • At 02:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Guy Butterworth wrote:

Complete and utter drivel for the past 3 weeks ,not one player can hold his head up. by far the worst performance of a england team ever , other less talented teams have lost but have at least tried , not one of these nancy boys put one once of effort in to winning, their full of themselves and full of excuse's , and a complete and utter waste of time. Lampard and terry are 2 of the most overrated players we have made the mistake of picking for the england totally tosh. there is no excuse for the lack of success or at lest playing well, and we should all barack them untill they start producing performances' worthy of the england shirt , or change of personnal is envoked.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 29.
  • At 02:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Simon Lester wrote:

We can go on and on about luck being against us and Ronaldo blatantly getting Wayne Rooney sent off. We can moan on about the Argentine referee and his bias against us. We can also moan about our lack of luck in the penalties etc etc etc.

But at the end of the day we were not good enough. We are told constantly how brilliant our players are in the lead up to this world cup but they failed, plain and simple. Calling England's footballers mediocre is being kind!

Wayne Rooney is a hot head and every opposing player knows that if you push him enough he will explode and get himself sent off. In my mind every coach who considers playing Wayne Rooney knows in reality, despite his genius, that he has a huge chance of exploding when the pressure is on. This leopard just can鈥檛 change it鈥檚 spots.

The Frank Lampard we all know and respect didn鈥檛 turn up and the normally assured John Terry at the back was often badly out of sorts. Where was the inspirational play from Steven Gerrard? David Beckham should never have been in this squad, he is a spent force in international football. He is only there because the fans love him and money men adore his selling power.

At some point we have to accept that we are not the best in the world. Maybe the quarter finals of the world cup is the best we can manage, in the absence of dodgy Mexican referees or even more dodgy Russian linesmen. Maybe England鈥檚 overpaid players are just mediocre at best and the press/agents/clubs inflate their abilities because it suits them. English clubs only do well in Europe because of foreign players and coaches.

Watching England鈥檚 sad performance last Saturday has definitely burst the bubble in my view, once and for all time, about the so called superiority of England鈥檚 football team. The next time somebody goes on about England winning the world cup, just take a look at the facts, the sad sad history and take it with a very large pinch of salt.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 30.
  • At 02:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Louis wrote:

What can I say? England lost but went to the penalty shootout in equal conditions and with the same chances of winning it. What a big pity that a great civilisation as ours is showing a huge bad face to the world outside... lost ok but at least could show a little more of respect to the game and to the other teams. Let me say that England has great players but do not play as a team! Portuguese did it, in good and moments of adversity and not only with England (Holland for example) and that's the work of coach. Move on and next time might be better! Don't blame C.Ronaldo, he was representing his team and country; M.United has not a fair connection.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 31.
  • At 02:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • martyn simcox wrote:

Don鈥檛 blame Rooney for England crashing out of the world cup. The seeds of failure were sown when the team was selected weeks ago (some might say five years ago).
Taking only four strikers when two were not fully fit, including a seventeen year old who would never make an appearance was complete madness.
With Owen back home, we all knew that a 4-5-1 system with Rooney as the lone striker would not work. Even the opposition knew that if they starved Rooney of the ball his frustrations would soon surface. If we 鈥渟imple folk鈥 can see the issues, why not the manager who was paid millions of pounds to bring back the world cup?
We need to blame Sven and the FA, no real progress after five years, with all that talent.
England were tactically weak and certain players showed they could not deliver on the world stage at the vital time (why are English players unable to take penalties?!).
On the positive side, the whole of the English back four played very well (Portugal would still be there today trying to score), Owen Hargreaves converted a nation and we finally saw why he was in the squad (including me!) and Joe Cole showed that he is by far the best English player right now.
My 9 year old lad was in tears has he watched his heroes fall and again saw cheats prosper. Thanks to Ronaldo, Henry, Figo etc my job of teaching my son how to play football hard but fair is getting harder and harder after every game we watch.
A large part of this England fans鈥 football soul died on Saturday afternoon and I only hope that my sons hunger for the game can somehow resurrect that dead zone.
FIFA and their army of 鈥淢ordor Orc鈥 referees are certainly taking the beautiful game into the abyss!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 32.
  • At 02:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Cormac wrote:

im from belfast and i know that northern ireland arent that good at football because we dont have the players. But from an england point of view that world cup showing was rubbish. They seemed to have no believe or inspiration in them. I dont whether its done to the manager or the attitude of the players. I dont think the fa done themselves any favours by keeping sven on till the end of the world cup but the players werent that good either. They either didnt play at all to their potential or they are simply over rated. I must say the way the media hyped them up to be wouldnt help either.
Thank you

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 33.
  • At 02:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Andy wrote:

As Ronaldo's penalty hit the net my 12year old son wept and kicked the chair in frustration, he asked why I wasn't so upset to which I replied "I have watched this overhyped England for years and still it doesn't improve, get used to it" harsh but fair. I agree with blogger's comment Joe Cole's goal apart wasn't very excited by what I saw. Tactics wrong, players picked were wrong, manager wrong. enough said

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 34.
  • At 02:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Danie Jones wrote:

Wayne Rooney is a disgrace. He should be mature enough now to realise such behavior as he showed on Saturday just is not acceptable in top level modern football. I have a suggestion or two for Steve Maclaren and the other Premiership managers: Reduce the salaries of these overplayed and undertalented players to the standard level of an average company executive until they can show true talent. Reward the strikers for every goal scored, the goalies for every save and the bad tempered ones for every final whistle acheieved without a card. Then, seeing as Portugal and their current manager seem to be our bogey team, send a few of the younger players out to play with Portuguese teams for a season or two, so they learn how to play the Portuguese way. Then we might be able to beat them third time lucky internationally?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 35.
  • At 02:19 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Cormac wrote:

im from belfast and i know that northern ireland arent that good at football because we dont have the players. But from an england point of view that world cup showing was rubbish. They seemed to have no believe or inspiration in them. I dont whether its done to the manager or the attitude of the players. I dont think the fa done themselves any favours by keeping sven on till the end of the world cup but the players werent that good either. They either didnt play at all to their potential or they are simply over rated. I must say the way the media hyped them up to be wouldnt help either.
Thank you

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 36.
  • At 02:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Neil Carroll wrote:

Does anyone believe that David Beckham was really injured that badly that he could not carry on last Saturday. I firmly believe that he was not injured as bad as he was putting on. He had no trouble running on to the pitch when Rooney was in trouble. And as for having respect for the ARMBAND. He did'nt show much respect for it when he threw it at Garry Neville when he was coming off the pitch. His promblem (besides Victoria) was he was not fit going to the World Cup. England will be all the better without him. He is the most overratted footballer on the planet.
Neil

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 37.
  • At 02:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dave Young wrote:

I have struggled as many have, to find the motivation to get up this morning. Almost 48 hours on and it still hasn't fully hit me, even though after our group-stage performances, I expected we would be lucky to reach this stage of the competition.

It's not all doom and gloom because we have the dawn of McClaren's reign to come and I look forward to positive changes. But for now I will have to mask the disappointment and live in hope that I see England win a major honour in my lifetime.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 38.
  • At 02:21 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Martin wrote:

I went to watch England v Portugal in the pub and it was a horrible experience. 2 hours of beered up thugs shouting obsenities and stereotypical slurs at the TV screen. A pervading sence of threat and thuggery. Compare that to when I watched Angola v Mexico is a Mexican bar in London. A great carnival atmosphere with everyone there to have fun and enjoy the experience. I'm glad England are out. We're a bunch of thugs that bring nothing but hate to everythig we do (look at Rooney). PS. Leaving to live elsewhere soon !

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 39.
  • At 02:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Sven-Goran Eriksson wrote:

I admit I am a rubbish manager for the following reason's:
ROBINSON - Who else is there??
NEVILLE - Unfit, waste of time
COLE - not enough games pre-world cup
TERRY - 1 man band
FERDINAND - I'll just turn up and take me wages!
BECKHAM - Unfit
ROONEY - Unfit - Injured
OWEN - Unfit - Injured
J COLE - No support - out of position
WALCOTT - Need i say more - Ive still never seen him play!
CROUCH - Desperate
HARGREAVES - Best Player - Canadian

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 40.
  • At 02:25 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dino wrote:

So, who & when was the last German to miss a penalty at a World Cup??

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 41.
  • At 02:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ian wrote:

A number of interesting and worthy comments. For me the World cup is no longer the spectacle it once was. Too much emphasis is put on diving and conning the referee.
Take a leaf out of Rugby League and Union everyone can see the action replayed on a big screen so it's not difficult to make decisions with a 4th or 5th official watching instant replays. Don't add extra time stop the clock for injuries that are deemed serious. If a team kicks the ball out for treatment to be given to an opposing player, the game starts from where that player kicked the ball out. Too much is made of a player feigning injury, the game stopping and the ball put into or as near as possible for the game to restart with a throw in and no advantage to the team attacking.
I agree with the comment watch the real time of Rooney being kicked and pulled back then judge was it deliberate - I think not. As for Ronaldo I hope it's his last game at Man Utd but after a spell of not making the team list.
As for England not enough commitment and poor decisions.
I'm off to watch Rugby and enjoy it before that becomes a non contact sport!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 42.
  • At 02:30 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

Of course they didn't deserve to win. In fact, I can't think of a team that does deserve to win. If there is any justice, the tournament will be dissolved and the World Cup will be award to someone more deserving: me, for example.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 43.
  • At 02:31 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Colin Knightley wrote:

I think all Englishmen would like to see their team play as France did against Brazil. Now they really struggled in the group stages and in their qualifying group. But got it right when it mattered.

I can't see any improvement happening under this new management. Unless they get Alan Shearer as front man and motivator to install passion and will to win in the team. He surely will sort out the penalty problem.
He also knows what goals scorers want in support play and organise a midfield to accomplish that.
Klinsmann has got Germany playing very well and you wouln't bet against them winning the trophy.
Shearer could do the same for England.

We are all fed up with mediocrity. We want champaign football NOW!
God knows we have the players to do all this.

We want a Natonal team to be proud of, one that sets the standard for others to follow.
I think we long suffering fans deserve at least that.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 44.
  • At 02:31 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Cam wrote:

If English fans now need to understand why Scots and other nations detest thier arrogance and refuse to be supportive this surely is the clearest example yet; before the match england were through and beating Germany in the final, again. Post match recriminations and 'I told you so's followed, with positions reversed faster than Italian politicos. Until there is some objective journalism on TV and English supporters find thier 'place' in the world rankings, we scots will continue to pour scorn on English "under achievement" and baseless bluster...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 45.
  • At 02:33 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Les Corrigan wrote:

It always starts the same, the English media crank up the expectation -England will go forth and conquer.
And it ends the same too, with the media wondering why.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 46.
  • At 02:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jake wrote:

I agree with just about everything that blogger says.

England played poorly through out the tournament. The squad seemed to lack any kind of conviction about what they were doing. You could almost see the confusion on the players faces when they were playing.

For all the talk of tactics and formations the England players looked like they had simply lost there enjoyment for playing football. At least in Italia '90 and Euro '96 there seemed to be a swagger and verve in some of England's performences, there was absolutely none of that this time round. That is why the Spanish or the Ghanaians will not be as disappointed with their World Cup campaigns as we are. They left their mark on the tournamemt by playing good football and won many admirers in the process. When was the last time and England team did that?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 47.
  • At 02:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Peter Speetjens wrote:

The problem with British football, and not just with the football, are the towering expectations that are created time and time again. Same in tennis. Every time Henman hit a good ball, he was tipped as the next Wimbledon winner. The same is happening now to Andy Murray. As Henman, so Murray is a talented player who can beat anyone on his day, yet he doesn't have the caliber of Federer, Nadal or even Nalbandian. And I'm afraid, that as in the case of Henman, the false (for partly ungrounded) and screaming headlines will only be a burden for Murray to actually claim the crown.
This same Henmania, or Henmedia, rules British football. So we were told: England has but worldclass players, it has a golden generation, and the Premier League is the strongest in the world.
To start with the last point. Yes, the Premier League is strong, but I don't think the British Top 5 will have an easy ride in the leagues of Spain, Italy, and even Germany or France. World class and golden generation? Sure there are several excellent players, but how many British players would star in my pre-tournament top-11 players? Not many, I'm afraid. Perhaps A. Cole as a left back, Gerard as an alround midfielder and possibly Rooney as a striker. That's it. Lampard? I prefer Deco, Kaka, Juninho, Ballack, Zidane to name but a few. Cole? I prefer Robben, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho to name but a few. Ferdinand? Give me Thuram, Carvalho, Nesta any time.
I think, a more balanced view on Britain's football history (no awards since 1966), as well as an in-depth look on what is happening in football outside the island, would be a healthy, if perhaps sobering experience for Britain. The problem is that it probably doesn't produce screaming headlines ...

Peter Speetjens
Rotterdam

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 48.
  • At 02:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • really wrote:

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

sorry i have gone slightly insane.

guess what we will all be doing in 2 years time for the Euros?, the exact same thing! England are the best, we are the best, our fans are the greatest ... despite there being trouble AGAIN by England fans, which amazingly the Germans were generous enough to play down.

we are not the best, our fans still have hooligans, our players are over paid and under achieving. I think with a good manager we can get the best out of the quality players we have ... is Steve McLaren that decent manager?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 49.
  • At 02:36 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jeremy Biggin wrote:

England were poor throughout as were many other teams. France started badly but in their last two games oused quality. Brazil's stars were not shining.

There's no such job as a full time England manager/coach - part time, picked for the next 2 games - e.g.Allerdyce/Curbishly/Warnock with the "prize" being to manage the team in the "finals"

Any selected player should have strength in BOTH feet and should be able to pass or shoot with left or right.

Too many foreign players in the English leagues...it's going the same way as cricket

Why not an England X1 in the premiership?

How long will it be before the World Cup is played between national teams selected from players who play in that nation's leagues irrespective of country of origin?!

Rooney should be sidelined, no excuse for temperament of that nature...he won't change

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 50.
  • At 02:37 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Paul wrote:

For me the blame for our failure is the FA.

I believe tha the FA is an old-boys network of football-associated has-beens. They sit there, sometimes sharing girlfriends whilst receiving substantial pay packets.
When some bright spark came up with the idea of getting England to with the Worldcup Sven's name was put forward, money was thrown at him and that was pretty much it.
I believe it is goingf to take more than money to get us into the WC finals. We need to completely re-think our approach:

1. No fixed captain.
Change the captain to different players as is necessary. This will encourage flexibility in the team.

2. Loosen up play.
Many teams allow players to move around a lot more. The Netherlands championed this approach in the early 70's.

3. Attitude.
Get in decent sports psychologists. Get rid of theis looser attitude we have addopted. Other teams, with less able players have done just as well or better than us.

4. The FA.
Sort this mess out. They are old and stuffy and in the past. We need a new radical approach that makes winning the WC a priority.
They also need to look at giving more young English talent a chance.

We need to work harder than any other team to win, that sounds unfair and its true. We have developed a loser attititude which is halving the ability of our players.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 51.
  • At 02:37 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • paul brennan wrote:

Yes I know we lost again but the important thing for me is to find out what that cool dance/techno music track is that plays over the preview footage of what's to come in the highlights show. can anyone help?

Ronaldo's in real trouble the next time he's in Manchester. the england fan'll roast him for what he did the Rooney! So will fans at all other grounds this season.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 52.
  • At 02:40 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Paul Clarke wrote:

This has been the strangest World Cup. We didn't have the excitement of Bryan Robson's early goals against France, of Lineker's hat-trick against Portugal, of Platt's last-minute winner against Belgium, or of Owen's wonder-goal against Argentina. In fact nothing to cheer at all.

The truth is that these players aren't as good as the hype. How many have shone in the Champion's League? Only Gerrard, maybe Beckham 7 years ago. These are not world class players, yet still the press calls them our "golden generation".

We had a different "golden generation" in Portugal 2 years ago, and still another in Japan. How many golden generations can you squeeze into a 4 year period? Of course, by "golden generation", the press are talking about David Beckham, whom most pundits wanted to drop in this tournament.

One day, people will stop buying newspapers. Maybe then we'll win something.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 53.
  • At 02:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Joao Nunes da Silva wrote:

LONDON-I think there were 2 players that make all the difference last Saturday.

One in a good way and one in a bad way

Rooney lost it! And now he's all over the press crying for retribution. For what? For having committed a foul that got him sent off and let鈥檚 wait and see, might even get him some extra punishment from FIFA or for making England game so much harder? England fans should blame Rooney that made the foul not like all seem to be doing now, blaming Ronaldo for Rooney's childish reaction.
But there鈥檚 no way that is going to happen as there's no way Rooney will apologize to the Country and fans (which is what he should be doing really).
I bet all English players and supporters would have loved to see him get away with it.
Not this time 鈥 Justice was made and he was sent off.

On the other hand Ricardo, the real hero of this game, got a hand in all 4 penalties (poorly) scored by England having saved 3 of them.
That made the difference. Not whatever Ronaldo might have said to the ref.

If I was playing football with 21 friends for a 鈥渢in鈥 cup and one of them stepped on another鈥檚 鈥渟oft parts鈥 I would have been very annoyed and would make sure he would get sent off for his conduct.
The one we鈥檙e talking about is solid gold and it鈥檚 called the World Cup remember鈥
That鈥檚 what Ronaldo did. And I bet that every single player in the England squad would have made the same and every single supporter would have wanted them to.

Another thing people seem to forget or don鈥檛 want to see鈥
Ronney stepped on Carvalho which is a Chelsea player remember?
Was there a bit of animosity from Rooney in that attitude?
Perhaps he was thinking of some old 鈥渄isputes鈥 while playing against Chelsea. No? I'm sure that's not the case... Rooney is not ill tempered to do such a thing鈥

People have a very short sight sometimes鈥 You want to blame somebody?
Blame everyone from the FA that picked Eriksson, all the way to the players that actually lost the game on penalties

It wasn鈥檛 the Referee and it sure wasn鈥檛 the Portuguese lack of fair play.


Thanks
Joao.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 54.
  • At 02:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

>How long will it be before the World Cup is played between national teams selected from players who play in that nation's leagues irrespective of country of origin?!


Why bother playing. Why not just sell the trophy to the highest bidder?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 55.
  • At 02:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • sannomaru wrote:

Don't be so negative (I know that may sound hard having just crashed out of the World Cup!)

People seem to forget how much luck comes into it. England ARE a good team. Look how many other good teams are out, and only one of the four good teams left will actually win it. Any one of those could win it, and so could we have on a different day, a different match.

We played badly and qualified (despite injuries to key players) just as we did in '66. Rooney's red card couldn't have been planned for - you might argue that Eriksson should have brought more strikers, but would that really have helped? Would Defoe have come on and turned the game? I doubt it.

Am I the only one who thinks we played well against Portugal and looked likely winners before Rooney was sent off, and looked more likely to score than Portugal even with ten men?

That's the World Cup - cruel & unpredictable, with 1 winner and 31 disappointed teams.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 56.
  • At 02:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Matt C wrote:

As a welshman I am a neutral in this world cup and did not care if England won or lost. But i am a Man Utd fan and i am disgusted that Rooney was sent off. It was a bookable offense without a doubt but why would a fellow United teamate run over and blag the ref to send him off? Yes this wasnt club football but you must have a bit of respect for a club teamate. I am confident now that Ronaldo is on his way out, if he stays he will be a linchpin for all the English players, especially Rooney, and also he still has his feud with Ruud. 拢20m good business, lets buy a good, mature right midfielder, Joaquim, Ribery, maybe Lennon.

Back to England and again they loose on penalties, how many times over how many years has this happened to you? You would think they would learn, especially after Euro 2004. Cant say too much though as im well aware my country fail to make the big stage, and so cant fully grasp the joy and excitement of watching your country play in the biggest competition in the world, The World Cup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 57.
  • At 02:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • sannomaru wrote:

Don't be so negative (I know that may sound hard having just crashed out of the World Cup!)

People seem to forget how much luck comes into it. England ARE a good team. Look how many other good teams are out, and only one of the four good teams left will actually win it. Any one of those could win it, and so could we have on a different day, a different match.

We played badly and qualified (despite injuries to key players) just as we did in '66. Rooney's red card couldn't have been planned for - you might argue that Eriksson should have brought more strikers, but would that really have helped? Would Defoe have come on and turned the game? I doubt it.

Am I the only one who thinks we played well against Portugal and looked likely winners before Rooney was sent off, and looked more likely to score than Portugal even with ten men?

That's the World Cup - cruel & unpredictable, with 1 winner and 31 disappointed teams.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 58.
  • At 02:44 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Terry wrote:

I could not understand why only 4 strikers were taken to germany. owen has not been fit enough, rooney was very doubtful and walcott had not played enough at top level and in any case was too young. Defoe and Bent were far better options. Although a West Ham supporter, Dean Ashton and dare I say even Teddy Sheringham would have done better.
Also the system of playing rooney on his own up front was a disaster.What team plays 4 5 1.
Svens appointment has proved a joke and I dont think McClarens any better.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 59.
  • At 02:44 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Avin wrote:

Lets face it. Sven picked our world cup players and formations the same way as if he was picking his National Lottery ticket numbers. Lets hope Mclaren does start playing the guessing game as well.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 60.
  • At 02:45 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • claire stocks, blog editor wrote:

The last German to miss a penalty was Uli Stielike in the , as Ian stated correctly in comment 15.

You can (UK broadband only) here.

(West Germany still won the shoot-out, but went on to ) .

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 61.
  • At 02:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Peter Byrne wrote:

The comments from Ben are fair

From outside of England it has been clear for months that the english midfield lacked a Roy Keane or Peter Reid type of player. Hargreaves partly solved the problem but not totally.
English supporters, and maybe management were blind to the lack of a tough tackler and playmaker.
It was obvious Englands midfield could be over-run or neutralised. Beckham & Gerard had not produced for England, Lampard , unluckily off form.
Dont forget a real team includes many parts, not just fancy go forward midfielders

Look at the great midfield players of the past such as Stiles, Hunter, Reid, Ince, Robson etc..
Get some of these types into your side and see the difference.

Of course appoint Terry as captain.

Regds,

Peter Byrne

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 62.
  • At 02:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • steve spinks wrote:

Good riddance to Beckham as captain. Did he make one tackle during the tournament and ended up crying.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 63.
  • At 02:50 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • zorro wrote:

Oh what a tangled web we weave as England supporters and UK media. we build are teams up with expectations of Glory and usually (but not allways) are somewhat bewildered by the final outcome.This was an England side full of quality players and certainly capable on their day of beating any team and yet was allways missing one major factor...confidence. The words were spoken by the team, but was not translated in their play on the field.
Every major team that is through to semi's was heavily criticised by their own fans and media prior to the Tournament and most of these countries are all previous winners of the Cup.
England players need to believe they can win, not be told they can by media hype and public pressure....Then we will win the World Cup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 64.
  • At 02:51 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Aussie wrote:

It's clear to us neutrals that Rooney:

Should be allowed to throw a tantrum every time he doesn't get his own way;

Should be allowed to verbally abuse premiership referees etc,etc

because, when things go wrong, it's obviously all Ronaldo's, or the referee's, or Ericsson's, or somebody else's fault.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 65.
  • At 02:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Superjim wrote:

that was well clever, Dan. very witty.
tell me - you not got the family brain cell this morning ?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 66.
  • At 02:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Danie Jones wrote:

Another note - mention of Alan Shearer. NOW there's a player who played well and knows how to behave too. He's one of the last of the gentleman players. He speaks well and played clean. Can public opinion appoint him and Gary Lineker (another Mr Nice Guy) to teach the England team manners, please? In my humble opinion, the likes of Wayne Rooney and David Beckham are certainly not good role models for the young players of today. Beckham may be (or possibly have been before he started believing his own hype) a good man-manager but his speech is atrocious and he can barely explain what he does in undertsandable English. As for that thug Rooney, if he'd tangled with a fellow drinker in the way he and Ronaldo did, both would be looking at a charge of at least GBH by now.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 67.
  • At 02:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Lewis wrote:

Let me start by saying I would have loved to see England win the W.C. but I also realise the fact that we are sadly not good enough.
I have watched the Rooney incident quite a few times, the referee was standing waiting for Carvallio to get up, he was not even going to give Rooney a card (let alone red), until Ronaldo came over & stuck his ore in, Rooney quite rightly let him know if had F.A. to do with him, I must say the push must have really hurt him, I bet he was black & blue with bruises the next day!!!!!
It was ok for him to put (not exactly a headbut) his head on Rooneys & whisper (I'd love to know) whatever he did, & Luis Figo to headbut a player as well, oh but apparently he was punished at the time by the referee who DID SEE IT, they should both be severely punished by FIFA, but then again not being English helps!!.....but i'm not bitter!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 68.
  • At 02:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • mike norman wrote:

i still think we have great players, but we need a manager that get the blood pumping and stick to the 4-4-2 which the players know and play week in and week out.


No silly systems, no technical rubbish - blood and thunder and 4-4-2
we will be fine.

Question is .... Will McLaren just carry on as before ???

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 69.
  • At 02:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • andrew mcloughlin wrote:

A few observations on world cup so far:
1.England's level of skill is insufficient to beat intl. mediocrity.
2.FIFA should act to punish cheats-use tv replays.
3.All teams have their share of"feigners, simulators"
4.We will soon be back in the "sky bubble",when most of England's players will become world beaters once again.
5.Pundits-I stopped listening to them when a. hansen thought Carrick was man of match against Ecuador!-use fewer ex footballers who struggle with coherence.
6.A prediction- Mclaren will not be able to naturalise Yakubu or Maccarone and bring them on with 10 mins to go to switch tactics when its gone wrong.
7.Its a team game-which Germany are once again proving.
8.Tv/radio/press media build up then report on the failure-not unique,even in western europe.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 70.
  • At 03:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ross Stephenson wrote:

Couldn't agree more, you can't be disappointed if you've no expectations to start with, goood old Sven!!!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 71.
  • At 03:02 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Will Golby wrote:

England were simply not good enough - look at the player stats by position and none of them made the impact they should.

In a Premiership burtsing with overseas talent we have homegrown players good enough to make a name for themselves at our top clubs but none of them performed close to their potential in this tournament.

This is down to poor training and bad management and I can't help feeling that the FA is about to serve us more of the same with Steve McClaren.

What worries me is that in a bid to find answers we are all too quick to lash out at the players instead of the management. Few people have done as much for English football as David Beckham and I still wonder why a man who has been such a hero on so many occassions is so quickly cast as a villain. He is one of the best servants of English football we have ever produced and he has simply been badly managed by the English coaching staff.

Rooney's behaviour was deserving of a red card no matter what influence Ronaldo had on the situation. But I do not blame him. England was not playing as a team that had any clear direction and that must have been frustrating for all the players.

We can talk about number of friendlies played versus other nations and the influence on imported talent on the ability of homegrown players to make an impact on the national game but when all is said and done this team's problem was a lack of preparation - they simply did not have a strategy for playing against the teams they faced and were unable to fill that void on the pitch. The performaces were just that - empty.

The FA's influence on English football seems at times to be as damaging as that of the RFU on English Rugby. It is clear that we need a coach who can instill passion, confidence and belief in the team. But we also need someone who can give the team a better sense of purpose for each match they face.

I do not believe McClaren has these skills. True, he was at Man.U. during a particularly bright spell but that team was set on its course before he joined and few of Ferguson's assistant coaches have done anything since leaving Man. U. to suggest that it was them and not Ferguson who was the main driver behind the team's success.

At Middlesborough McClaren has been mediocre and Southgate's commentary has even suggested that his influence in successes has not been as great as McClaren would have us believe.

Finally, McClaren has been an influential part of the current managerial set-up. The set-up I believe was the route cause of England's dire performance in this World Cup. I would happily swap a Quarter Final place for a group stage exit just to have seen us play one game without any inhibitions. McClaren is not a passionate man, nor is he a great leader or moulder of men - if he were we surely would have seen something of his influence on the pitch over the last few weeks? Afterall this was his opportunity to show us what we were getting.

I don't know why the FA rushed this mangerial posting with the World Cup looming. It was obvious that no one of the experience and integrity we seek would be able to, or willing to make such a commitment - except Martin O'Neill.

My hope is that the FA will reflect on this World Cup and McClaren's part in it and they will reconsider the rushed appointment they made. Yes, it would be a PR disaster to sack a manager before he even appointed his new captain but as an England fan I cannot stand the thought of another 10 years of poor England performances before we have a team that is as enjoyable to watch as the team Venables brought together for Euro '96.

In the meantime, I have have loved David Beckham for the goals and assists that have seen us through when England has been struggling to come up with the goods and I will not make him the scape goat for the fact that he and his team were not managed or trained in readiness for this World Cup.

Let's forget about English passion when choosing a manager and start using our heads and not our hearts. Some will say this is too boring but I disagree - Germany use their heads and prepare thoroughly - no one can accuse them of being dull this World Cup and they might just even win it. Then you look at us and our 'passion' and yet we were the most inhibited and nagtive team of the competition. Confidence comes from knwoing what you are doing, from being ready.

Not that you could classify McClaren as a passionate man in fact the only FA requirement he seemed to meet was being English.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 72.
  • At 03:03 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • andrew mcloughlin wrote:

Last but not least:
When will we get a team/coaches that the present supporters deserve- when we wake up to reality-mediocre teams tend not to win the world cup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 73.
  • At 03:03 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Brian Thomson wrote:

> Comment 62: People seem to forget how much luck comes into it. England ARE a good team.

I can agree that you need a bit of luck but not the way you see it. England had luck, and plenty of it.

Lucky to qualify for the World Cup in first place from a very easy group, lucky to be handed the easiest group in the World Cup itself "The group of dreams", lucky to win against Paraguay and T&T, lucky to play Ecuador (possibly the easist last 16 match), lucky to win against Ecuador after them hitting the bar, lucky to have Rooney available at all, lucky to be relatively injury/suspension free (look at Portugal's suspensions for that game), lucky to survive until penalties, lucky to play every game as a 'pseudo-home' game with 30,000 fans or more.

If you had given most other teams that sort of luck then they'd be in the semis. England blew it because they are NOT a good team. They have reasonable individuals, overrated by the press and the fans who play in an overrated league.

But you cannot compare them to the passion and flowing football that we've seen from the likes of Germany, Argentina and even Ghana, yes Ghana!

England deserve to be going home now, the only surprise to me is that they didn't go earlier. But that was down to luck, and plenty of it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 74.
  • At 03:05 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • ana campos wrote:

England failed and Ricardo, the Portuguese keeper was able to defend the penalties. It is time for the English press learn to respect other Nations and their football teams. England was not the first team to go home. The english media should show the pride on their team, supporting them when they need. This is the reason why the English people are not appreciated abroad.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 75.
  • At 03:06 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • ana campos wrote:

England failed and Ricardo, the Portuguese keeper was able to defend the penalties. It is time for the English press learn to respect other Nations and their football teams. England was not the first team to go home. The english media should show the pride on their team, supporting them when they need. This is the reason why the English people are not appreciated abroad.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 76.
  • At 03:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Francis wrote:

Ben's right that it was a joyless spectacle watching England in this tournament. I differ in that I genuinely would prefer to England play wretchedly and win. I'm getting to an age when I can't afford to be choosy. I want to see them win something while I'm young enough to enjoy it. However, in lieu of that, some 茅lan and (I hate to use this expression) passion, much like that exhibited week in week out in the premiership would have been nice.

I'm reminded of Euro '96 when albeit disappointed at not winning the thing, most England supporters could not find it in their hearts to have anything but pride at the team's display.

English football will never scale the technical heights of the South American game, but it is the most watched version of the sport. This is due to its breathtaking speed and passion. It's beautiful in its own way. If England went out to Portugal after having played breakneck, devil-may-care, exhilarating football, I ,for one, would have been delighted.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 77.
  • At 03:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

Please, please, please do not make Gerrard captain of England. What is all the hype about him anyway? He can't pass properly - look at his first half displays people ...passes overhit, hit too hard and the woeful penalty attempt = no bottle. Terry is you man.

Also our new 'boss' ought to look at the german method of playing as a team, Hargreaves has been taught well. Also go for youth NOW - get rid of the deadwood now - it didn't perform over the past few weeks and it will not in the future.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 78.
  • At 03:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Liam Anderson wrote:

From a Scotsman & with no hint of gloating (how can I with our recent record!) All of the England games were mince to watch, no attacking flair, no individual brilliance (JCs goal apart although O thought the keeper could have done better) just shear drudgery! The tournament is better without the likes of England & Ukraine. The mentality seems to be "lets not lose a goal then when the other team tires go for it"
In all honesty I wish that half of the England players had been born north of Hadrians wall but the way they are hyped up is unbelievable! There has been a lot of hysteria about the Scots not wanting England to win because we hate everything English. This is absolute nonsense! What really irritates us is your media! To hear Ian Wright say at the start of the tournament "I don't care about anyone else I just care about England" whan is being paid to give unbiased analysis just sums it all up! I also have to say that purely for their comments after Saturday's game both Wright & Shearer should never be allowed to sit on a football panel again! Comments like "I'd land one on him" (Shearer) & "Ronaldo needs sorted out" (Wright)have no place on a football programme. So when some thug does sort Ronaldo out will he get away with it because "Ian Wright said thats what should be done"? Wright is an embarrassment end of...!
Rant over.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 79.
  • At 03:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Peco wrote:

As a Scot, I could not really care either way if England won the world cup but as a football fan I cant believe the hype surrounding Ronaldo.

Can someone tell me how it is Ronaldo's fault that Rooney stamped on Carvalho? Surely there is only one person to blame there!

Alright, Rooney is a very special talent but sometimes he just over steps the mark and I find it even more baffling to hear Eriksson also getting the blame. Granted, he should have went with different tactics and played someone beside Rooney but anyone who has played football at any level knows, when you stamp on a player, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Finally, the sooner the fans realise that the England team is not as good as they think, the better for all concerned, including the players.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 80.
  • At 03:12 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tim Nicholson wrote:

I disagree, I don't think England do need a Keane type of midfielder. England do not have the type of player who can unlock defences with an outrageous piece of skill or through ball, or have the ability to leave two or three players on their backsides....Gerard and co are great players but they don't and can't do the unexpected that you need to unlock the best defences in the latter stages of the world cup. We need a Zidane or a Deco or Totti (you know what I mean!). The last time we had someone of that sought of quality was Gazza in 1990 - and we were so close then.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 81.
  • At 03:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dan wrote:

That was very clever Superjim, very witty.
Tell me, do you always speak from that end of your body?

Great stuff Superjim.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 82.
  • At 03:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Louis wrote:

What can I say? England lost but went to the penalty shootout in equal conditions and with the same chances of winning it. And their football throughout the tournament has been convincing? What a big pity that a great civilisation is showing a huge bad face to the world outside... lost ok but at least could show a little more of respect to the game and to the other teams. Let me say that England has great players but do not play as a team! Portuguese did it, in good and moments of adversity and not only with England (Holland for example) and that's the work of coach. Rooney is a good player but still imature. What he means by breaking Ronaldo? A player from the United and with the visibility that he has should have more sense. English squad does not know how to loose and blame all around but their football in this tournament has never been convincing. Move on and next time might be better! Don't blame C.Ronaldo, he is representing his team and country. Do you really think that if a portuguese player would do the same thing as Rooney did English side would accept it in a pacific way?! Oh, give me a break. Other problem is that English players think that their (huge) wages make them stars and that they do not have to run and work like the others (wages and names do not guarantee results). British squad does not have experience in other championships, they are used to England's and Premiership style and do not have international experience (apart of a couple of them). All that is important. Sven is a good coach but not for a national team and he never knew how to adapt the game to the real needs.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 83.
  • At 03:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rui Gomes wrote:

what a disgrceful thing for Alan Shearer tom say that Wayne Roony should assault Cristiano Ronaldo when they get back to pre-season training.
what Cristiano Ronaldo did is what every footballer in the Continent does. it's calles win and if someone like Wayne Rooney, who is a fantastic fottbaler, loses his head its no one's fault but his.
Alan Shearer is a legend and many young footballers wll take his word as gospel. what a hypocrit. surely his memory is not that bad as it was not long ago that he got Roy Keane sent off by goading him near the touchline at St. James Park.
so apologise on air, if you have the guts, or forget about bein involved with England. you're no better than the hatchet men that taint the beatiful game

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 84.
  • At 03:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • george doors wrote:

you english need a reality check. take a leaf out of us scots. we thought we'd win the world cup in 1978
now we dont expect anything ( cos were crap)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 85.
  • At 03:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Liam Anderson wrote:

From a Scotsman & with no hint of gloating (how can I with our recent record!) All of the England games were mince to watch, no attacking flair, no individual brilliance (JCs goal apart although O thought the keeper could have done better) just shear drudgery! The tournament is better without the likes of England & Ukraine. The mentality seems to be "lets not lose a goal then when the other team tires go for it"
In all honesty I wish that half of the England players had been born north of Hadrians wall but the way they are hyped up is unbelievable! There has been a lot of hysteria about the Scots not wanting England to win because we hate everything English. This is absolute nonsense! What really irritates us is your media! To hear Ian Wright say at the start of the tournament "I don't care about anyone else I just care about England" whan is being paid to give unbiased analysis just sums it all up! I also have to say that purely for their comments after Saturday's game both Wright & Shearer should never be allowed to sit on a football panel again! Comments like "I'd land one on him" (Shearer) & "Ronaldo needs sorted out" (Wright)have no place on a football programme. So when some thug does sort Ronaldo out will he get away with it because "Ian Wright said thats what should be done"? Wright is an embarrassment end of...!
Rant over.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 86.
  • At 03:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dazsmells wrote:

Small point this, but I have to agree with Mr Ryder, regarding Terry Butcher. I've stopped reading his articles now, but what I did read was poorly written, generally spiteful, and thoroughly unconvincing. Why have the 成人快手 - normally such good judges of pundits/reporters - resorted to this twerp. He has achieved precisely nothing in football, either as a player or a manager. Get rid.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 87.
  • At 03:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Paul wrote:

The big problem fo me is Ericksson's loyalty to players who have 'done it' in the past.

The only game where we played as a team was the Ecuador game. They neutralised the threat from the wings completely and if Lampard had turned up, we'd have had a few more goals. Hargreaves was doing a great job at right back and Carrick was actually (the first time for eons) making forward passes on the deck, rather hoofing-it like Ferdinand.

So what does Ericksson do for the next game? Sacrifice Carrick so that Gary Neville can take up his guaranteed-if-fit position along with Beckham, Gerrard, Lampard et al.

When John Terry was taken off against Sweden, the proper choice was Carragher (who's had a great season again), but no, we had to have Campbell. Again someone who's done it the past but has been almost clown-like every time he's come on recently. No wonder the rest of the defence went to pieces.

Every single person I know thought that the system against Portugal was overly defensive, and by half time it was absolutely clear we needed more firepower up front, but we are made to wait for Rooney to stamp on someone's gonads and get sent off before SGE does something.

Then it's 'backs-to-the-wall' time and plucky England do their plucky stuff and lose.

And all that crying on the field. What was that all about? The idea that England had any chance at penalties was a joke.

They all knew they were going out before the first penalty was taken. Lampard, Gerrard had it written in bold capitals all over their faces.

I've been sticking by the team and the manager uptil Saturday, but now it's over I say good riddance to SGE.

Only wish it was Martin O'Neill taking over.

P.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 88.
  • At 03:21 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rui Gomes wrote:

what a disgrceful thing for Alan Shearer tom say that Wayne Roony should assault Cristiano Ronaldo when they get back to pre-season training.
what Cristiano Ronaldo did is what every footballer in the Continent does. it's calles win and if someone like Wayne Rooney, who is a fantastic fottbaler, loses his head its no one's fault but his.
Alan Shearer is a legend and many young footballers wll take his word as gospel. what a hypocrit. surely his memory is not that bad as it was not long ago that he got Roy Keane sent off by goading him near the touchline at St. James Park.
so apologise on air, if you have the guts, or forget about bein involved with England. you're no better than the hatchet men that taint the beatiful game

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 89.
  • At 03:22 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rob wrote:

I can't think why anyone is surprised we got knocked out - I'm amazed we got as far as we did. With the exception of Hargreaves we have played without passion or committment and inevitably our skill levels were nowhere near good enough. Radical changes needed - we want people who play for pride not for self publicity !!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 90.
  • At 03:28 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Daniel Gomes wrote:

what a disgrceful thing for Alan Shearer tom say that Wayne Roony should assault Cristiano Ronaldo when they get back to pre-season training.
what Cristiano Ronaldo did is what every footballer in the Continent does. it's calles win and if someone like Wayne Rooney, who is a fantastic fottbaler, loses his head its no one's fault but his.
Alan Shearer is a legend and many young footballers wll take his word as gospel. what a hypocrit. surely his memory is not that bad as it was not long ago that he got Roy Keane sent off by goading him near the touchline at St. James Park.
so apologise on air, if you have the guts, or forget about bein involved with England. you're no better than the hatchet men that taint the beatiful game

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 91.
  • At 03:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Nick wrote:

Re comment 72 - just ask Leicester fans and players if Alan Shearer knows how to behave.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 92.
  • At 03:30 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

It's interesting to see that on one hand basically everybody agrees that Owen Hargreaves was the best English player and to then read Dan's (#20, 21, ...) comment that the English league is the greatest and therefore the players don't have to play outside England. Well, where's Hargreaves playing? Exactly. Bayern M眉nchen. Germany. Maybe that's where he learned to score at penalty kicks... :-)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 93.
  • At 03:31 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ronnie Clews wrote:

As an Expat living in Germany, the frustration at seeing England crash out of a major competition again is more than just soul destroying. You have to listen to the comments and needling to understand how much everyone here wanted us out. Dodgy Referee decisions and diving opposition apart, England always set themselves up as potential winners only to fail miserably time after time. Our attitude to the game is too honest. We are not prepared to "win at all costs" and that coupled with a squad full of players either injured, inexperienced, over-rated or just simply knackered from one of the longest domestic and international seasons of football played anywhere, has once again ensured that expectations were not lived up to. If we want to get anywhere, we need less hype and more planning. The FA has got to change the way our national team prepares for major competitions, allowing more time for the squad to R&R and the manager to get the right mind set going in the team - and no WAGS!!. The Press and the Media have also got to stop "Peaking and Troughing" as if every match or injury was the day of the 2nd coming. Given the right preparation we could have gone all the way this time. Without it we just keep on dremaing!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 94.
  • At 03:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ronnie Clews wrote:

As an Expat living in Germany, the frustration at seeing England crash out of a major competition again is more than just soul destroying. You have to listen to the comments and needling to understand how much everyone here wanted us out. Dodgy Referee decisions and diving opposition apart, England always set themselves up as potential winners only to fail miserably time after time. Our attitude to the game is too honest. We are not prepared to "win at all costs" and that coupled with a squad full of players either injured, inexperienced, over-rated or just simply knackered from one of the longest domestic and international seasons of football played anywhere, has once again ensured that expectations were not lived up to. If we want to get anywhere, we need less hype and more planning. The FA has got to change the way our national team prepares for major competitions, allowing more time for the squad to R&R and the manager to get the right mind set going in the team - and no WAGS!!. The Press and the Media have also got to stop "Peaking and Troughing" as if every match or injury was the day of the 2nd coming. Given the right preparation we could have gone all the way this time. Without it we just keep on dreaming!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 95.
  • At 03:33 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

I agree with post #75. (Especially about the 'Sky bubble' and pundits. I had to sit and listen to Hansen slate an excellent Hargreaves at half-time against Portugal. Then, after the 120, he claimed Hargreaves was the best player on the pitch.)

I also agree with what Alan Pardew was saying about England being a team that was 'gripped by the fear of losing'. And it showed. (Germany are the one team at this tournament who look like they don't give a jot about losing, just as long as they give it a shot. Good luck to them, I say.)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 96.
  • At 03:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tony wrote:

How can you say the Joe Cole goal against Sweden was the only bright spark of the tournament? If you remember the Sweden match was meaningless as England had already qualified anyway. Surely the Beckham goal against Ecuador was the highlight of a mediocre team performance considering that magic free-kick sealed England's progression to the Quarter Finals single handedly.

I think people need to realise that England will always be a tier 2 team, the fact they have never got further than a quarter final in 16 years speaks volumes to that theory.

I blame the media partly for saturating the hype and losing all sight of realism. Had we gone into the tournament with a sense of normality and realism a quarter-final result would've been seen as "respectable" instead of a "disaster."

Let us not forget that the only teams to have fared better than England are Germany, Portugal, Italy and France.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 97.
  • At 03:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

I'm really surprised at the attitude to the players. This was the most talented group to come out of England for at least 15 years, probably longer. Sven believed there were loads of talented players around and he put his money where his mouth was: he selected 72 of them during his reign.
Abd that's the problem. No continuity, of either tactics or selection. The players didn't know from week to week where they'd be playing, who with and in what formation. No wonder they never looked settled: they weren't. They were shackled, not settled.
Lampard looked like he'd got stage fright, which he wouldn't have had if he'd been playing pretty much the sme place in much the same team for the past two years. Beckham would have been better in a defensive midfield role, because he's not as fast as he used to be - but his ball-winning and defenssive work was excellent.
Generally, we saw a team of outstanding talents whose great potential was never exploited because they literally didn't know what they were doing. And did the manager? The selection of Theo Walcott - very promising but not there yet - ahead of Jamaine Dafoe, when the fitness of two talismanic strikers was in doubt was idiotic.
Sven was right to say 'don't blame Rooney' - not least because whether Rooney actually committed a foul - afetr having been fouled himself four or five times immediately before the ref blew up - is very much open to debate. But why did Sven say it? To divert attention from himself, I suspect. It wasn't rooney's fault: it was Sven's. He made a mess of this championship. He made a mess of the England team. With all that talent at his disposal, he cocked up, big time. He should move on wherever he's going as soon as possible. Goodbye and good riddance.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 98.
  • At 03:37 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David W wrote:

The England team had some world class players and on paper had a great chance of doing well. I do find it totally bizarre that players have to be 'motivated' to play well and win a game. This is the world cup for heavens sake, every footballers dream stage and one where confidence for the England team should be high given the suposed calibre of players in the team. There were too many average performances from 'star' players who should of been at their peak and desperate to prove their billing. The players who failed were the ones expected to shine, whilst the players lined up in supporting roles were the only glimmer of hope (Hargreaves, J.Cole, Crouch and Lennon.) Argentina and Spain, although out too, at least put in some very impressive performances and inspired their fans but Brazil, like England, failed to meet expectations, rarely got out of second gear and in fact did not deserve to be be in contention for the final and glory on MERIT. France and Italy have improved as the competition has progressed and we were always being told that England would too - but sadly it never came.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 99.
  • At 03:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Danny Brilliant wrote:

England were mediocre. Sven is as good a manager as the team were players. Rooney learnt a cruel lesson but he will be wiser for it. David should certainly concentrate on his modelling while he has a few years left. They have all done very well moneywise out of this adventure. Good for them all.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 100.
  • At 03:39 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Richard Hurley wrote:

Phil W - completely agree and let's just be clear about this.

The premiership may be the best league in the world but other nations now benefit from knowing how the English play the game. As a result, dealing with/defending against the tempo, velocity etc is less of a problem.

With so few players in foreign leagues, we have little hope of being able to deal with or take on the Italians, French, Germans, Spanish and Portuguese at their own games (e.g. playing the game as though grass grew on the ground rather than hoofing it upfield in the hope of a mistake/some tenacity/an occasional flash of brilliance).

It is all very well living in isolation about how our leagues etc are the best, but the fact is that this is a global game and the sooner we (both players and fans) stop being so provincial in our attitudes the better.

As for Rooney and Ronaldo, well - Wayne you had to go. Doesn't stop me thinking Ronaldo is an eejit. Showboating does not make you a great player: how often did we see Cruyff, Pele, Maradona, Gullit etc stepover well at the expense of doing the rudimentaries well also?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 101.
  • At 03:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

The issue here is fans versus Engish people.. A fan won't go into a World Cup knowing his team will win, they'll be hoping, where as an English person (i.e. Non-football fan) will assume we're going to win and moan when we don't, and probably read poor-quality newsprint, and basically spend the next 2 weeks spouting whatever is written on the back page of the sun.

Me, I'm looking forward to 2008, I *know* we're gonna win that ;)

P.S. Gerrard for captain!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 102.
  • At 03:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Richard wrote:

England need to change their mentality from "penalties are a lottery" to the simple philosophy "the team who scores the most goes through". Practice practice practice. Get a qualified referee as part of the squad and make them take penalties every day during the world cup as if it were the real thing not avoiding the finest detail such as having the players in the centre circle. Carragher not realising he had to wait for the whistle epitomises Englands philosophy.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 103.
  • At 03:45 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Greg wrote:

Surely I don't know as much about English football as the most bloggers here, yet I'd like to contribute to this discussion from a German point of view.

Before the tournament started, I was very confident England would play a major role in determining the new WC winners. You got a good defence and a very reputable midfield with players like Lampard, Gerrard and Beckham beeing able to make a difference. The lack of decent *and* healthy strikers was the only flaw I could see.

But after the first couple of games it was quite apparent England could not live up to the high expectations at home as the squad could not dominate the weaker teams and struggled again in the match vs Sweden. When the first real test came, England showed a good performance, but it was not enough to beat an enfeebled Portugal.

Why is that? By looking at the players beeing a part of the sqad, you can easily tell it's not a lack of quality. And I disagree with the argument there're too little Englishmen playing abroad because that counts for Germany as well.

I think that, on the one hand, Englands' expectations were too ambitious. Everyone - the manager, the players, the fans and the press - repeated the slogan "We *will* win the WC" at every opportunity, although there're like 8 other teams that actually could win the WC. Lifting the trophy is too difficult a goal that you could plan it or take it for granted. Notwithstanding, everything else than winning the WC seems to be viewed as failure, although reaching the quarter-finals is already a great success.

On the other hand, I was under the impression the sqad never really believed in its strength. After every game, the players kept promising a better performance for the next match, but - to me - it sounded like hollow phrasemongering. In addition, SGE let them play a very defensive and halfhearted system that was hardly convenient to lift the players' faith. During the final shootout against Portugal you could tell the English lack of confidence by looking at the players' body language.

Four yeary ago, I enjoyed the magnificent English victory over Argentina, and if it hadn't been for a brilliant Brazil, your side would have made it to the finals giving our guys another beating.

Somehow the spirit of that team has vanished long ago, sadly. Hopefully, your new manager will bring a turn for the better.

Greets from Cologne!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 104.
  • At 03:46 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • John Polska wrote:

I can only agree with the vast majority of what people have written. My great concern is that McClaren might be another "yes" man for the English FA. I was rather troubled when I heard that Martin O'Neill (who has stated that he DID want the position) was rejected after replying "only if he's playing well enough, then yes" to the question "would you choose David Beckham as captain?". I hope I have been misinformed....does anyone know if there's any truth to this? I think we should have chosen a different type of manager when we had the chance, and he ought to have been installed as soon as the decision was made - or else, keep Sven's resignation quiet until after the World Cup. It's another English FA shambles. I feel so frustrated that we shan't be on telly on wednesday evening.......

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 105.
  • At 03:51 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tony Momoh wrote:

Just a note the players in this country are to over hyped from beckham and co.
Its just a shame the public don't see :(

why is the premiership so entertaining please tell me?
its the likes of henry / robben / van nisteroy / cech / garcia / fabregas / drogba / crespo / yakubu and much more that give's views value for money.

I imagine it was the reverse watching rooney / beckham / lampard / gerrad / rio / e.t.c they are not value for money sorry to say but true.

The problem here is one you 2 scenarios, first you have henry /garcia plus the rest that were hungry to achieve something due to certain surroundings they struggled all there lives growing up in tough neighbour hoods seeing love ones mugged / degraded in soceity i mean think of what a the ghettos are like in france / spain / argentina / holland.

Secondly you beckham / lampard they have struggled but what struggle when everything is based on hype in the UK .They dont have ghettos in this country if they did the willigness to succeed will be apparent not just based on earning but belief/survival and gutts.

I think there wages should be capped first of all and everything should be based on performance related pay you tell me if they wont get it sorted. To much money living lives people in the UK aspire too. Its a shame to say but true are looking at working class people but not scholars.


The desire to be a winner is not down to money but down to desire and belief as a human being forget the ego,search within you.

Look at wenger / mourinho / freggy / bentiez e.t.c that's all I have to say

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 106.
  • At 03:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Craig Morris wrote:

I think the press and media have to take some of the blame for England's failures. Yes, we won the world cup and it was a fantastic achievement - but that was 40 years ago. So why rake it up every 4 years since then? It doesn't matter if Geoff Hurst's goal was over the line or that we lent the '66 match winning ball to a museum in Germany. It's simply a history lesson with nothing to be learnt from it. The best thing we can do is to forget the past and look to the future. That means no more Alan Ball (sorry Alan) as a TV pundit or 'where are they now' specials, or the media filling air-time and column inches with 40 years of hurt. Instead of trying for the tournament fair play award, we need to focus on winning. And it's the press and media that play a large part in setting the tone of the nation - and the expectations of the team.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 107.
  • At 03:54 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • One of those scotch wrote:

England were possibly the most boring team in the world cup, completely flat, no penetration, no flair (except maybe lennon). You looked like scotland under berti vogts, though with better players/defence, nobody seemed to actually have a clue how exactly they were going to score. In the last 210 minutes of football, you didnt score a single goal in open play - 3 and a half hours and this supposed "golden generation" could only muster a free kick (which should have been saved) from a has-been.
Once again, overhyped, overrated and a media build up that makes anybody who's not english want them to crash and burn. Only problem was that you were so unbelievably crap - much worse than previous years - that nobody up here ever really feared that you could win it, and the fear is half the fun.
England always need their damn scapegoat. This time its ronaldo for complaining to the ref that his teammate had his balls stamped on. Reverse the situation and imagine your reaction to roooney asking for a red card for a ronaldo stamp... get over yourselves

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 108.
  • At 03:54 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Richard Hurley wrote:

Oh - and maybe, next time, England should be a little bit more like France (post group stage) or Italy: e.g. play like the games are your last games *ever* and have a resolutely group based approach - players and coaches sticking together rather than worrying about whether there was a hair gel/soft drink photoshoot to go to!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 109.
  • At 03:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Whoever wrote that Beckham faked his injury is talking rubbish. He is out of action for 6 weeks, also shown by the fact he was visibly upset to not be able to take any further participation in the match after he was subbed. So he protested at the Rooney red card during the match, oh so that of course means he was faking his injury then...

You will always see people have a go at Beckham, but who else in this tournament for England provided 2 crucial goal assists and 1 crucial goal to get the team to the QFs? No yellow cards, defensive help and general stability. If it was anyone else they'd be immortalised in gold. As Pele said last week, England need him and he has nothing to prove.

And it is highly pathetic to say "good riddance" to him when not many captains have helped the side get to three major tournaments and 3 quarter finals in a row. And that guidance came just last week with the Ecuador goal. And people have the nerve to call him a bad role model? At least he has redeemed himself time and time again over the 6 years.

England will miss his right foot more than people will ever credit for at this moment in time...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 110.
  • At 03:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • synklair wrote:

Some of the worst football i watched this world cup was watching England. We would have only won the world cup despite Sven not because of him.
For Sven to pick the pick a player based upon a happy slapping mms he received from Wenger shows how tacticly inept the man truly was.
Wright- Philips was told he didn't play enough games for Chelsea ( not that i would have took him anyway.) so he wont pick picked for England but Walcott..... There's irony in there somewhere.
No could escape the hype and not got caught up in it, but in reality most of us were embarassed by watching sunday league football from 'so-called ' world class players, who seemed all the way through this competition uncomfortable with the formation and instructions they were given. I always thought you play to your teams strengths and Sven has no idea how to do that.
I do think that Lampard or Terry are over-rated, as Makelle and Gallas do all the donkey work for them and it showed.
A couple of bonuses, the defence,also Hargreaves, Carrick, Joe Cole, Lennon, the talent is there!! and with King, Anton Ferdinand, Nolan, Defoe, Bent just to name a few we have the players to win but not the manager, i hope that SM will make the changes needed, make big decisions, but alas i dont think this will happen.
My final point make Steven Gerrard England captain top class player, top class captain, leads by example.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 111.
  • At 04:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Kath H wrote:

England was never going to win. Why don't the rest of you ever expect to come away having lost? There can only ever be one winner and with the present team it is never going to be England. It is not the fault of the players nor even the manager. It is because we do not have enough English players playing in the Premiership. We need to change the rules on overseas players so that we can nurture home grown talent. It will also prevent the fiasco of Premiership team mates scrapping on the pitch!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 112.
  • At 04:01 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • simon wrote:

I believe this team was good enough to go all the way, the only problem was that Sven made bad decisions "big decisions".

Lampard should of been dropped, as a Chelsea fan it hurts me to say that but he just did not turn up. Perhaps a spell on the bench would of woke him up, but of course that was too much for Sven, unlike the Italian coach who dropped Totti and brought him on late in the game against Australia and he made a impact, basic common sense.
Beckham should of also been dropped, I think it was clear enough to the rest of the world after his initial display that Lennon was going to cause all types of problems for the opposing teams of the world cup, again Sven would not take the hard decisions, why? He had nothing to lose, he was on his way out anyway. Perhaps he still has to remain buddies with Beckham, as the next Real Madrid coach.
Why is it that after seeing two years of Lampard and Gerrard together for England and everyone knowing that it does not work,why does Sven continue with such folly?
The basic fact is the manager got it wrong he had a great team and never let them off the leash, the caution that he showed by not taking more strikers should off been a warning sign for everybody, Sven was going to be very negative in his approach to the world cup games, and this approach never gathered any confidence in the team.
They looked like a bunch rabbits caught in the headlights of a oncoming truck.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 113.
  • At 04:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Putting aside the hype over whether England were good enough, whether Rooney should have been sent off, whether Ronaldo influenced the decision, where do you English see your team going now? How will they develop, improve, how will Mcclaren change things and make his era different from Sven's? Who do you want out? Who should come in? These are the questions the English FA should be asking you because the fans are the only people who make sense

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 114.
  • At 04:10 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rick wrote:

GroovyDave,no doubt a scot.Im sick of them pouring scorn over England.Hopefully Scotland will get a decent side sometime in the next 50yrs so the Scots can concentrate on their own comedy team.

Saying tht,England were poor throughout the tournament and although i would have loved them to progress,they didn't really deserve to with the performances.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 115.
  • At 04:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • sicknote wrote:

There has been so much spin about how good this team is. I'm not English but got fed up of Sven saying that the best was yet to come from this team. What best is that? In the past 10 years I can remember 2 great performances from an English team - 4-1 v Holland at Euro 96 and the 5-1 result in Munich a few years ago. Sven has used that as his benchmark performance ever since. Unfortunately they havent come close and didnt look like getting remotely close during this tournament. The team needed goalscorers up front to progress and didnt have any. They also needed a back 4 who played like a back 4, and Frank Lampard Jnr shouldve gone to specsavers before the tournament- he might have had at least 1 shot on target if he had

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 116.
  • At 04:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Rod wrote:

So, England are home with tails between their legs after a dismal failure yet again. It was all so predictable :

Incessant hype for months about the 'golden generation' winning the World Cup, right down to the details of the victory parade

A clearly unfit Michael Owen picks up another injury.

The red mist descends on Rooney for more thuggishness and a red card.

Theo Walcott - minutes on pitch = 0, nice holiday = 1

England fail to beat Sweden. Again.

England fail to beat Portugal. Again.

England bottle it at penalties. Again.

The English media write off the hosts as no-hopers - 'the worst German team in living memory'. Germany outperform England. Again.

The English media blame everybody (the ref, FIFA, cheating foreigners, the CIA, aliens...) rather than the failings of themselves and their own team.

England immediately installed as favourites for Euro 2008 (by the English).


For once, can't England just go into a competition realising that they are just an average team, and giving the other teams the respect they deserve? Then again, don't bother changing...it's so much fun for the rest of us.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 117.
  • At 04:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DaveH wrote:

One of those scotch sounds like he had more than one of those scotch.. He is right though - we were crap. Scotland have been through this, so they know what it's like - oh, sorry, I forgot.. they never actually got this far in any tournament - still, they know what it's like to lose alright, and they're right, we just weren't good enough.
I've been pleasantly surprised by the comments fron Scots and Welsh contributors - I expected much more gloating. The good thing is that, in the main, they realise that it isn't English football fans that created the hype, it was the press. The sad thing is that a lot of us wanted to believe it. It actually looked logical with the players available. The problem is that Sven didn't use them properly, or they didn't perform, or we just plain weren't good enough.. we lost... Ahh well, there's always next time!
Let's hope some more of the home nations make it through qualifying - let's hope WE make it through qualifying. It would be nice not to be carrying the flag alone - to be fair it'd be nice to see the Scots because you can always rely on them to have a go, even if they go down, they go down fighting. Nobody can say the English didn't go down fighting though - and there'll be some bruised Portugese plums to prove it!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 118.
  • At 04:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • tom wrote:

I think cristiano is a disgrace. I think that he should not be allowed to play football in this country again. And what a performance from the heroic Owen Hargreaves, who received so much criticism, but showed everyone what a player he can actually be...He was outstanding and did not deserve to be on the losing team

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 119.
  • At 04:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Geoff Buckingham wrote:

Englands next Captain.

F.A.
Do the sensible and thing for once skip a generation and for the next England Captain and appoint Michael Carrick NOW !! let him grow into teh role to lead us into teh next world Cup.

The hasbeens have failed us dont even think about Terry or Gerrard.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 120.
  • At 04:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Andy Burton wrote:

Any true football supporter could have told you that England were never good enough, but like you many people have believed in the Press hype instead of realising that the 'best two' midfielders in the Premiership have not performed consistently well for England -who? The two who manage to score from 30+ yards every week but not from 12yards for England.
All this tosh about Sven's tactics makes me laugh too...you mean to tell me that these so called superstars cannot think for themselves once they cross the white line?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 121.
  • At 04:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • steve fos wrote:

England do have good players, but they have to be given the confidence to go out onto the pitch and use this ability. Our players confidence was undermined by Sven, by playing them out of position and in a formation which they were not happy with. Hargreaves was excellent on Saturday, but is naive as a holding player. England played better after Rooney went off because they adopted a 4-4-1 formation which they were all more comfortable with. Rooney's sending off was only a result of his frustration at being a lone striker!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 122.
  • At 04:19 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • meb wrote:

Can anyone enlighten me on this theory..

There are two certainties in life..

Death and
England losing on penalties

..heheheheh

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 123.
  • At 04:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Honest Al wrote:

1. Leave the kids (Rooney & Ronaldo) alone; both did things that are acceptable & normal in hot pursuit of a goal.
2. If Ronaldo wants to play for Man Utd next season, fine; if he doesn't, fine. The nay-sayers are no better than the Brits who took-the-p when the Ities sacked from Serie A the S Korean who knocked them out of the WC last time.
3. When this country gets itself a proper name , it might assemble a proper team. "England" is not a national entity, & the "United Kingdom" is a ruritanian nonsense.
4. Until then, I DON'T want Germany, France or Portugal to win the WC.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 124.
  • At 04:21 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Mike wrote:

Lennon could have been the new hero if he'd scored the open goal that presented itself to him against Portugal. At the moment he's not fit to lace Becks boots. Lots of mazey running which looks spectacular but very little in the way of a final ball. One for the future though.

Beckham has been a fantastic captain. I wish him and his family well. Our goal tally in Germany would have been halved without him. It would be nice if the press and pundits would get off his back for a while. What did Taylor/Butcher/Lawrenson EVER win at International level. Not a lot! Taylor worst substitution ever when he took off Lineker, Butcher famous for bleeding a lot in Italy and Lawrenson famous for shaving off his moustache.

If they wanted to pick on a midfield player then surely Lampard must have knocked 拢10 million off his value, he was awful - couldn't hit a cow's backside with a banjo. Owen Hargreaves set the benchmark and deserves all the plaudits.

Roll on 2008. England forever!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 125.
  • At 04:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Rooney's red was harsh, I don't see where else he could put his foot without risking injuring himself with an awkward fall, but what was Carvalho doing tackling from behind with both feet forward anyway, isn't that a foul and yellow card straight off?

I don't think we'd have won in any case, so this isn't a hard luck story. But I'm not blaming Sven, strange as his decisions might be, because in truth this wasn't, isn't, and never looked like being a golden generation, that's just the SKY-fuelled premiership hype machine talking. They need your subscriptions, so ratchet up the billing for every player, but have we really players to match those Bobby Robson had? Barnes, Beardsley, Waddle, Steven, Robson, Walker, Butcher, Wright, Shilton, Pearce, Parker, Hateley - 20 years ago Clive Allen could score 49 goals in a season and barely win a cap, 10 years ago Robbie Fowler was experiencing similar. Hateley left Milan for Monaco, scored right through the '86 qualifiers and was usurped by Lineker for the finals, with Cottee, Dixon and others missing out entirely. Now we blast Sven for not taking the likes of Darren Bent or single-figure Defoe? We just don't have the depth we used to.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 126.
  • At 04:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dunks wrote:

Well, it's all over now, and McClaren has to take stock of what went wrong and ask himself how we could take a clutch of some of the brightest stars in world football and make them look so average.
Gerrard has to be captain. Terry has helped guide Chelsea to a couple of Premiership titles, but Liverpool won the European Cup after Gerrard took it upon himself to get back into the game against Milan. Very few players have the ability to do that - and he grows with the captaincy.
Please, Steve - pick Stevie.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 127.
  • At 04:25 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • r phillips wrote:

shame england's mental flaws were exposed yet again... still, was nice to see a world class player win the match. get over it you muppets!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 128.
  • At 04:25 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • PedroB wrote:

Thought the article was a bit hard on Ford Mondeos myself!

Lets face it, England have some of the best players available, but on performances were definitely among the poorer, less inspired teams to progress throught to the quarters. I've heard the expression before and it seems to apply to Sven and the team, "Good Horse, Bad Jockey".
If he thought they were as good a team as is left in, he shouldn't be commenting on, let alone running, a football team. Hope Mclaren does a better job.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 129.
  • At 04:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • janus wrote:

The reason England doesn't deserve to win is that they tolerate (and the media and former players apparently encourage) the hooligan/yob culture that embarasses civilised Englishman the world over.
Yes it can be "entertaining" to hear Shearer's shameful comments (isn't inciting violence in public a criminal offence?) or read the tabloid's daily dose of propaganda for the lower classes (which incidentally ensures they will always remain low class), but it contributes to the culture of violence and intolerance that permeates football, specially with some fans (ie. England). For that reason I don鈥檛 take my kids to the matches anymore. I was at the match in Gelsenkirchen and was saddened by the look of fear and confusion on the face of many portuguese children faced with threatening and abusive behaviour from many english 鈥渇ans鈥. Shame on you England for tolerating these goons and shame on you FIFA for allowing these goons to sit mixed in with the Portuguese fans at the stadium. I personally witnessed violence and threatening behaviour which the stewards preferred to ignore (no doubt in fear for their own safety). The Germans have been keeping this type of behaviour out of the news outlets, surely so as to not encourage more, but you can't hide it from the people present in the stadiums and the city centre. I will never go to an England match again, ever.
And you talk so much about fair play. Hypocrites.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 130.
  • At 04:27 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Andrew Smith wrote:

Thank you for stating so eloquently what many of us have been saying for years. Far too many people believe England to be way better than they really are and are therefore constantly disappointed when they make their inevitable exit.

The fact is, England benefit from their seeded status, gifting them minnows against which to play their early games. This allows them to progress from the first round despite playing stale, unimaginative and uninspiring football. Eventually they face some 'real' opposition and as we've seen repeatedly, are unable to overcome them. However, they did indeed progress to the later rounds, which earns them seeded status for the next tournament and the cycle continues.

What we have is a 2nd rate national side masquerading as a 1st rate one. The sooner the 成人快手, the press and the supporters accept that, the better off we'll all be.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 131.
  • At 04:27 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • JMB wrote:

I think it is apalling that England progressed as far as they did given their pathetic performance. Mexico going out early while England advanced made a mockery of the World Cup. Mexico displayed talent that England can only dream of.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 132.
  • At 04:28 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • brian murphy wrote:

You cant blame Sky or the 成人快手 for over hyping the premier league...at the end of the day they have to over hype it because theyve invested huge sums of money for broadcast rights..meaning they have to create huge hype in order to get people to watch it!!!its up to the english public to make their own minds up!!!!just cos somebody on tv says this player is great or that team is great...watch the bloody game yourself and make up your own mind!!watch other leagues to help give you some comparison...the best game i saw all last year was werder bremen v bayern munich where bremen won 3-0 playing an all out attacking style (against one of the best teams in europe with whom a cetain english star happened to be playing but people in england still think he could be the target of premiership clubs!!!!!!!!why?????)!!!just because you dont see other leagues on tv does not mean they are crap.....return to the perspective of the premier league!!!!!in the last 20 years 3 english teams have reached the final of the european cup/champions league,2 have won......now compare that with serie A, la Liga, the Bundesliga, or even the french championship and it will tell its own story!!!!and the last point to add to that is how many english players represented foreign teams in these finals compared with french, german, italian, portuguse, spanish and even eastern european or south american players
a severe reality check is needed by the whole english public!!!!because at the end of the day the media is only represntitive of those who listen to it....if you do not agree with them find an alternative they wont be long catering to the demands of the public on who there profits depend!!!!

last point best soccer coverage of last year was james richardsons gazzetta coverage of serie A on bravo(even with some idiotic pundits)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 133.
  • At 04:28 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Alan wrote:

They looked like a bunch rabbits caught in the headlights of a oncoming truck.
I completely agree. In fact the prevailing thought in the english side at its most optimistic was "we might be able to win here"
How many times have we seen England balk in front of the big guns like Germany and Brazil, rather than go out and play football.
Most of this is intheir heads. They need to be inspired! After every half time break the boys played WORSE! Sven just can't inspire.
We should take a page out of the Brazilians book and play with the desire not just to win but to score as many goals as possible - to totally annihilate the opposition (remember 5-1 against Germany - what joy!).
As for the hype that this was the best team ever - what rubbish - Sherringham, Shearer, Adams, Pearce, Seaman, or 1990 when we came 4th with Shilton, Gazza, Lineker, Waddle Platt Wright. No this was a long way from the best team that England have fielded in the last few world cups. And as everyone has said - we took no strikers with us this time. Sven screwed our chances, not the players!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 134.
  • At 04:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ben wrote:

It's time to acknowledge that Sepp Blatter is right to call for the reduction of the Premier League to 18 clubs.
England played less internationals (9) than any other nation. Germany played 27. The two bottom clubs in the Premiership are always yoyo clubs and really just dilute the overall standard of the league. Sunderland are a prime example of this.

So for English club football and international football, listen to Fifa and not the Old Boys network of the FA.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 135.
  • At 04:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Martin wrote:

What another over zelous promise... All talk no action, well excluding the negative side. Without our bad luck we'd have no luck at all! Maybe next time I'll cheer for every other team we play and the disappointment will be dealt in their hand for a change.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 136.
  • At 04:33 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Outraged wrote:

Only just now I fully understood what Shearer and that other bloke I can't remember his name said about Rooney sticking one on Ronaldo (english slang is sometimes beyond me). In a normal country, such comments would have been considered dishonorable and, I dare say, infamous. They would have been sacked from whatever jobs they held as commentators for inciting violence and hatred. FIFA has sacked and punished for much less. I put what they said at the same level of those racist chants by spanish fans.

But not amazingly the majority of the English fans and even 成人快手 seemed to consider those statements perfectly normal and justified. Sure, blame Ronaldo for your own incompetence.

Do you have any idea how you all look pathetic at the eyes of the world? Crying and lamenting for a defeat that it was written right under your noses from the very beginning? You deliberately chose to ignore the mistakes of your managers, the unfitness of most of your players, the wrong tactics adopted on the pitch. Many times you voiced your discontent but you still believed that it would be possible. Scolari displays confidence because he knows how to do his job. Sven displayed confidence because he was desperate to please a crowd that would feed him to the lions if they weren't pleased enough.

It has been wonderful to see the enormous respect and good grace of the french media toward the portuguese team. They are not blinded by prejudice and outright stupidity. If those 成人快手 pundits are going to remain for Euro 2008, then 成人快手 news is out of my bookmarks for good.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 137.
  • At 04:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

Completely disagree. Thought the team that went out each game gave everything they had. Now get behind them. obviously not an England fan. Every time England goes out they get this. You wouldn't be saying this if England had won it but played rubbish!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 138.
  • At 04:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Mike wrote:

Nice to see all the non-English particularly Scots on here enjoying our downfall. Perhaps we can do the same the next time they reach a World Cup Quarter Final.....and then I woke up from a strange dream, what was I thinking.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 139.
  • At 04:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jen wrote:

This is got to be the funniest thing I have read in a long time...all full of fans doing the usual, blame the ref, blame the weather, blame the opposition. Don't you all ever stop and think that MAYBE there was a reason that you didn't go any further this year, and that maybe that reason is that you are just not good enough? England are NOT in the same league as Italy, Brazil, Germany...the only people who think that are the English people and the media. Your media ALWAYS overhype every tournament you enter, and that is where people get this belief. Ask a foreigner who they expected to win the cup, and you can be sure they won't say England. England aren't rubbish, but you are NO WHERE near as good as you think - and for that you will ALWAYS be disappointed. You won the World Cup 40 years ago - big deal! The world of football has moved on since then. As for the Premiership being the "best in the world" - well it really does depend on your point of view - but I can think of many who prefer La Liga or even Serie A. And as another commentator stated - who is it that makes the Premiership the best anyway - all the foreigners! If you all want to avoid disappointment in the future, stop expecting more than you are capable of - and maybe then people will have a higher opinion of your team and your fans. Blaming everyone but the team is just pathetic. There is NO WAY Ronaldo GOT Rooney sent off...Rooney stamped on a guys privates - he deserved the card and more. And somehow I don't think anyone notices the connection of team-mates of other clubs, unless it happens to be a premiership team. Get it through your heads, England is NOT the centre of the universe, you are NOT world beaters (consistently) and as the other commentator said you had PLENTY OF LUCK this time, because really, you were lucky to get through the group stages.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 140.
  • At 04:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Alan wrote:

139.

At 04:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,

Ben wrote:
It's time to acknowledge that Sepp Blatter is right to call for the reduction of the Premier League to 18 clubs.
England played less internationals (9) than any other nation.

I had no idea: It's no wonder we can't play as a team if the team never really plays together!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 141.
  • At 04:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • richard wrote:

Why is everyone going on about whether England played well or not. At the end of the day Germany are through on penalties, England are knocked out. There lies the problem, the penalties not the 2 hours prior to the shoot out.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 142.
  • At 04:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Joao Nunes da Silva wrote:

Bottom line is England tried, and then tried again, but they didn't play enough to win to Portugal.

Get over it

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 143.
  • At 04:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • stevefos wrote:

Jen, hav you actually watched Italy play in this tournament? They were almost as bad as the English and and the French only played well against Brazil. We might not be world beaters this time but do not criticise us for being true supporters who HOPE our team comes good. I am very proud to support England and will continue to remember the great times like thrashing Germany in Munich and Holland in Euro 96 untill we come good again!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 144.
  • At 04:51 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Asif wrote:

At only one point in five games did I jump off my seat in excitement. The Joe Cole Goal.

Most comments on here are absolutely right. We were pathetic, Eriksson is crap, top class players who cant play as a team, we didnt use the right formation and the biggest problem was the squad.

The prat chose Walcott who's never played in the premiership over so many decent strikers and didnt take SWP (who had played) cos he didnt play enough, but he did play as opppose to little Theo.

The squad was the first step and sign of intent. Campbell, after what Zamora did to him, I was scared to watch him play. Yes he used to be our rock but now thats all he is. The defence was solid apart from him, and thank God cos thats what we relied. The midfield squad was ok but our options were never used. Carrick should've played if Lampard or Gerrard werent on top form. SWP should've started if Beckham wasnt playing well with Lennon as back up. Joe Cole should've been used more, he is the only player except Rooney who can give the opposition a headache. With Downing as backup great, we couldve had a strong midfeld who can pass with lightning wingers down either flank. Where was Jenas ? Parker would've been a stronger player.

Upfront a completely different story, one man short again. Crouch 'the option' was Englands greatest striker ? What a joke. Yes he scored. And ok with Rooney injured first then Owen leaving he was OK. But how could we forget Defoe or Bent & the man who I think is our next Shearer, Dean Ashton ? I would've even have prefered if he'd taken a gamble on Marlon Harewood (pace, strength, power) as oppose to Crouch (missing headers & long ball).

Good luck Mclaren, do whats right for the country, and don't be scared of the players or the media.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 145.
  • At 04:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • AJ wrote:


If English players had even a tenth of the passion that England supporters have, things might have been different.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 146.
  • At 04:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Mr Stix wrote:

"We will play better". "We will play to our potential"...... next time...
Finally time to realise that WAS Englands potential and no matter how much blame is placed with Sven it won't change the simple fact that they aren't good enough and never were. The sooner people like Ian Wright, Garry Lineker and Co. stop saying they are "world class" when they are not even "good" the better.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 147.
  • At 04:54 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • The Rev wrote:

There's an awful lot of bitter Scots around aren't there ;-)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 148.
  • At 04:55 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tequila wrote:

Everyone can moan as much as they want, truth is all this retribution would still have happened had England made the semi-final and lost... or even the final.

To blame Ronaldo for everything going wrong is pointless, we still didn't look like scoring all the time Rooney was on the pitch! Fact is they played better once he'd gone. Star players under achieved, due to formation and tactics, not because they were a man down. Rooney's temperament is questionable at the best of times....

One last thing, well done Theo, I've never played in the premiership either but I would have liked to have had front row tickets to every England match! Don't know if you can kick a ball Theo but I like your style!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 149.
  • At 04:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Simon Turner wrote:

You have to look at the planning of our campaign - there have been three fundamental errors:

1. When it was announced that Sven would no longer be England manager after the world cup, he should have gone there andthen. I'm not doubting Sven's professionalism, but Santini's immenent depature had the same effect on France in 02. How many managers have announced their department and stayed until the end? I can only think of Bobby Robson. Once you know you are going your motivation drops considerably - it is human nature.

2. Not taking enough strikers was a mistake. Bent / Defoe / Beattie were all better options than Walcott - and why was Jenas taken?

3. Why were the Wags there? They were a complete distraction. It put the players on holiday mode and it showed. Our preperation should have been milatary style. Rather than taking in the sights, should the players not have been reviewing tactics, focussing on the game and dare I say, practising penalties?

As for a new captain, Terry is meant to be a leader so why didn't have he the balls to take a penalty. The players should have been queing up to say 'give me the ball I'll slot it in!'They didn't have the heart or desire. It's a national disgrace - there should be an investigation!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 150.
  • At 04:57 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • stu22 wrote:

Hi, a Scot here who did actually want England to do well. Trying to give a neutrals perspective I'd say Sven is at fault for being a weak leader (Beckham and Owen and Rooney should have been left at home) as is the media for overhyping the talents of Englands players. England need a combative player like Gattuso for Italy in the midfiled to balance the flair of Gerrard. I reckon there are lots in the premiership. Hargreaves is willing but not a good distributor of the ball. Beckham isn't the player he was, every cross and free kick missed it's mark except the Ecuador goal. You need pace on the flanks and he doesn't have it. Lampard played very averagely as did most of the squad. Rooney wasn't mature enough to play as lone striker and needs to grow up quickly. Every team is gesturing to the ref and acting up so why everyone is getting het up about Ronaldo winking is pointless -England needs to get more streetwise and stop looking for excuses. Penalties- at least none of the England players missed the target, the Portuguese keeper did well. Two of theirs missed the target completely - penalty shoot outs are a simple lottery and the fact Germany have won most of their penalty shoot-outs is simple good fortune, nothing more. Argentina and Spain both looked good and they didn't even make the quarter finals. The teams doing well are scoring more freely than England, Germany and Italy with 2 strikers, France have only one but it is Henry who's quicker than Linford Christie! Personally I'm not sure this a golden generation, the 1990 England team was way better (Beardsley and Lineker could both score easy).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 151.
  • At 04:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Matt Halsall wrote:

I wish people would layoff with trying to find a scapegoat. We lost to a good team with an excellent coach. If we had been successful in the penalty shootout it would be all praise and smiles. We played a good game and were very unfortunate to lose. I don't want to go too much into "what ifs" but if Rooney had stayed on we were going to move into a 4-4-2 formation with Crouch which may have resulted in that crucial goal. We played like we had 11 men and we must give them credit for that.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 152.
  • At 04:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Danie Jones wrote:

OK Nick (post 96) so Alan Shearer doesn't know how to behave. Fair enough. How many times did he get sent off in his career versus how many time has Rooney (already) been sent off?

And if Shearer doesn't light your fuse as a well mannered player, who should be installed as Behavior Therapist to a bunch of players who, if they were not being paid megabucks for pottering round a pitch, would probably be robbing people to make the same amount of megabucks?

At least Shearer can speak clearly, even if you may not always agree with his views. Unlike Beckham, who mumbles and can't speak verbally as well as he (occasionally) can with a ball at his feet.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 153.
  • At 04:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DavidNowLost! wrote:

In the premiership these players seem to perform at a high consistent level, or do they??? How good is the premiership? Have we got carried away with our own publicitiy? How much of an impact are the foreign players having on our national game? Or was it simply about some underperforming stars, injuries and a Swede with a touch of surreal team selection?!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 154.
  • At 04:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Stewart wrote:

At no time did England show any passion about their craft. All I heard was the belief that they could win. I never saw any evidence that they were good enough to win it, until.....

Only at the end when they realised that they were going to be beat did they put some passion into their game. Their performance was good after this.

Rooney's tackle was violent conduct. Don't look for someone else to blame. The referee was right and is paid to make his own mind. If he was influenced, blame FIFA not Ronaldo.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 155.
  • At 05:01 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Doug Thompson wrote:

RE: Martyn post #35 Hey Folks, I am a Yank living in Brazil. I rooted for Eng mainly because they were one of the few teams that wasn't full of pussy's diving and screaming in pain from tiny or non existent hits. It is so pathetic, especially when the supposed hero's of football like C. Ronaldo and Henry etc. get caught on video obviosly faking it. Yes,
my son, here's the deal, your heros are people that cheat to win and you too can grow up to be just like them! How inspiring. Rich, famous people with the
character of rancid peanuts. At least Zidane has character and talent.. other than him there are few left in the final four to root for. So heads up my cousins, you have one thing to be proud of at least. The lads may have not been the best team, but to my eyes they played with courage and character beyond most this time around....

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 156.
  • At 05:02 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jonathan Biskupova wrote:

I think the england team were a crap side except for Joe Cole,Hargreaves and Crouch. The country just knows how to hype itself as a great sporting nation. The players girlfriends and wives were more interesting to watch in germany than squad. What the hell is all this noise about the best side england has ever had to win the world cup...well if u ask me,the likes of Theo and Lennon are the future of this country and that will be the best side they have to win WC if McLaren does it right. And please,lets stop all this over-rating of english players. The media does it really well. i think they just sit down and said "well since Beckham is leaving, we had better recruit another dude"...well they chose the wrong man to recruit in Rooney.what will u say of Messi,Tevez,Ronaldo,Ribery,Schweinsteiger when u say Rooney is world class? England should stop the hype and play football on the pitch not on paper. Few world class footballers have emerged from this country..they are Gazza,Lineker,B.Charlton and G.Best who was the best.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 157.
  • At 05:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anon wrote:

After reading a few comments, it seems Portugal aren't great but they managed to beat England. So if Portugal aren't great.........where does that leave England?????

The GAME in itself rules. Stars may come, stars may go but the Game of Football is sure to flow.

Later. VIVA PORTUGAL, VIVA. FOR脟A PORTUGAL.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 158.
  • At 05:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Geordie Abroad wrote:

Every body seems to forget the 1-0 result against Northern Ireland in the WC qualifiers.. How exactly could we be lead to believe we were good enough to win the World Cup? A lucky win against Argentina in a friendly was the whole basis for this arguement. Shocking

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 159.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Nick Fisher wrote:

I see that Terry Butcher and Chris Waddle are being sneered at for their thoughts on this campaign. I am afraid to say they are absaloutley right and their previous history as managers has little to do with the validity of their comments. We hyped England far too much and we need to establish quickly that we may have a great league but our national side is very average. I dont know what games people were watching but we didnt exactly qualify for this tournament in style. In fact we looked ordinary when playing the likes of Estonia. The best teams in the world dont consistantly underdeliver and hide behind the excuse that 'we only play well when the game means something' Football is a global sport and we have no right over it. We are a top 8 side in the world and no more. I have watched English Rugby and Cricket over the years and have seen the highs and lows, this doesnt make me a expert merely a realist as I know when my team is not as good as the competition.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 160.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dadooronronroninho wrote:

I wonder if tom (message 123) was among those knocking Hargreaves before the tournament.
OH is fit, committed and believes in the team. Where did he learn that? Bayern Munich. Not my favourite club in Germany where I live as an expat, but I wonder if England could pinch their coach, Magath, and do the rest of the Bundesliga a favour.
Magath's fitness regime for the players is legendary, by the way. Reminds you of what they used to say about Liverpool in the 70s and 80s.
He would sort out the men from the boys, or let's say the Gerrards from the Lampards

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 161.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • pearo wrote:


it hasnt been just Engalnd who have done nothing worthwhile for the last month

The only game that had any passion was Croatia v Australia which had a few scores to be settled

Thankfully i have plenty of other sporting interests to take my mind off this mind numbing tournament

the worst aspect is how much time the media spent going over every little aspect of each game, the amount of money the 成人快手 must have spent of licence fee payers money is bordering on criminal

A complete feeloading exercise by all media who were there- and dont let them persuade you otherwise-

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 162.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Mizako Togo wrote:

No one expected England to win this tournament except the English (nothing wrong with that) despite the hype from the media, the manager and players. The stuttering performances and the squad selection should have bourne out the fact they were ill-equipped to win this tournament.

The day England will win the World Cup or European championship will be the day they send out a sound, fit team made of players who are there only on merit.

And whilst its good to be mindful of history, the usual diet of 1966 gravy its heaped too high! Give it a rest.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 163.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Nick Fisher wrote:

I see that Terry Butcher and Chris Waddle are being sneered at for their thoughts on this campaign. I am afraid to say they are absaloutley right and their previous history as managers has little to do with the validity of their comments. We hyped England far too much and we need to establish quickly that we may have a great league but our national side is very average. I dont know what games people were watching but we didnt exactly qualify for this tournament in style. In fact we looked ordinary when playing the likes of Estonia. The best teams in the world dont consistantly underdeliver and hide behind the excuse that 'we only play well when the game means something' Football is a global sport and we have no right over it. We are a top 8 side in the world and no more. I have watched English Rugby and Cricket over the years and have seen the highs and lows, this doesnt make me a expert merely a realist as I know when my team is not as good as the competition.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 164.
  • At 05:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • pearo wrote:


it hasnt been just Engalnd who have done nothing worthwhile for the last month

The only game that had any passion was Croatia v Australia which had a few scores to be settled

Thankfully i have plenty of other sporting interests to take my mind off this mind numbing tournament

the worst aspect is how much time the media spent going over every little aspect of each game, the amount of money the 成人快手 must have spent of licence fee payers money is bordering on criminal

A complete feeloading exercise by all media who were there- and dont let them persuade you otherwise-

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 165.
  • At 05:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Bob Ring wrote:

Having read all the comments posted here I have to ask how come we all got fooled by the English media. I live and work in Germany and they have hammered the German team for months and Jurgen Klinsmann as well. Yet England, who would have trouble winning a raffle were proclaimed as being among the favourites.

I have to agree with all those who have said that being paid 100 Grand a week does not make you World Class.

One thing that did go through my mind was that perhaps this was Sven`s revenge. Look at the strike force he took with him.
1: Rooney - injured and not 100% certain to be ready before semi-final.
2: Michael Owen - not as sharp as he could have been - perhaps 60% fit.
3: Peter Crouch - has problems standing up for more than 5 minutes at a time. Okay as 谩 sub but nothing more.
4: Theo Walcott - Never played. Now Sven says "He has now experienced the World Cup and this will help him in the future" Bloody marvelous, we have proven strikers that could have helped us actually win the thing but we give a 17 year old a free holiday at the WC so he can experience it. Would have been better to let him go along as Svens adopted son and stay with the wives.

But lets now get real. Perhaps in 40 years we will be ready. Euro 2008 - NO CHANCE - WC - 2010 we will probably not qualify.

But now we can say goodbye to Sven, beckham, Campbell, Neville and some more of the "Golden Girls"

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 166.
  • At 05:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Bega wrote:

England were terrible throughout the cup. We deserved to go out. I don't blame the players, however I find it difficult to know where the fault lies. I would seriously look at the lacklustre management skills not being able to create fluidity and motivate potentially the best England team in decades, the lunatic UK press and the celebrity (brainless) WAGs - in that order.

You can see with all the nonsense surrounding Rooney how crazy the British media have become. The British media motivated Portugal more than us - what is that all about?

Finally, the WAGs really showed us up for the nation we have become. More interested in celebrity, gossip and intrigue, rather than support for the team.

Completely ridiculous and utterly disappointing, right from the beginning.

Germany - France final please. Two honest teams with spirit.

Auf geht's Deutschland!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 167.
  • At 05:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ron wrote:

Gee ! Guys ! I have seen so much being talked about here. I couldnt agree more. The problem is that the Enlgish press feed us so much crap be4 these tournaments and I cant understand why at the end they do not own up to their crap when it falls down. If you ask me, they are in the forefront of tearing down their own team after every tournament. Word of advice - Other teams build up on their failures after losing and thats why over time they have become the best. The English press could use a leaf from such countries. Otherwise, shut up and look to the PL in August.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 168.
  • At 05:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Andrew Greiner wrote:

Ok so let's clear a few things up first.

A) The lads did give their ALL.
B) Their ALL was not even close to good enough.
C) Are we ALL really surprised???

Not since 1990 have I looked at an England team and thought that they were good enough to win a World Cup. We are miles behind our European counterparts. Look at the Premier League that so many of you loved the idea of. Filled with foreign players and coaches... Did we all lose track of that??? It's not the English players in English teams that are winning trophies rather it's foreign players in English teams winning trophies.

I am appalled that the English allow themselves to be raped at the counter, raped in Parliament and now raped in the grounds. Take back your game from the people who do not love it and cherish it like you do. There are too many politicians running the game and too many models playing it. Let's see some raw talent like we did in the 60's 70's and 80's. Get your kids out playing and get your coaching badges cos things aint gonna get better unless the people begin to understand that they are the future of British football. The US is already spending hundreds of millions pushing the game and despite their infancy they will buy themselves success.

Stop blaming the players and the coach. We already know their failure was not being good enough. Now it is time for the country to ask why they were the best of the best. It's simple - There were no better English players. But then are we surprised???

Long live the Premier League and all the foreign players that keep it the best league in the world.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 169.
  • At 05:14 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • John wrote:

OK lads. I've just read 148 postings - all negative - all talking about the PAST. That's enough whingeing - start talking about the FUTURE. All I want to see now are some sensible suggestions for a squad for Euro2008.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 170.
  • At 05:14 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • James wrote:

Let's be honest. England's players do not have pace and guile when they're on the ball. We don't expect them to play like Brazilians or Argentinians but these qualities were seriously lacking. The way England plays is predictable.

As for formations, does it really make any sense to play defensively when it is obvious that the opposition is missing two key players?

I think England should stop playing lousy weak friendlies against easy opposition and concentrate on playing tough friendlies against better opposition.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 171.
  • At 05:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • jen wrote:

To Stevefos - yes I have watched Italy play. I watched a team who took part in a game full of ACTUAL poor referee decisions, I watched them convincingly beat the Czech Republic who are an excellent team, and I also watched them thrash Ukraine. What exactly did England do? Grab a win from Paraguay by the skin of their teeth (or should I say own goal), draw with Sweden again, beat arguably one of the poorest teams in the competition, just beat another team who surprised the world, and then draw with a rather depleted Portugal. THAT is the facts. WAKEN UP. You were lucky to get as far as you did, and you always will be. But as soon as you meet the big teams you are CONSISTENTLY knocked out. Yes, you win sometimes, but in order to be in the leagues of the best you have to CONSISTENTLY perform - something England do not do. And as for hope - hoping is fine, hoping is good, hoping is positive. Saying we will win, when you don't have the pedigree or players to win, is either very arrogant or just plain stupid.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 172.
  • At 05:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • km wrote:

England has many world class players. In fact we are spoilt for choice. The problem is not lack of individual quality players. Week in week out in the premiership we've all seen the every player in the england team play, they are good players, if they wern't good they wouldnt earn the money.

The problem was the selection and negative tactics. we should have been playing 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 or even 3-5-2. We only conceded 2 goals in the entire tornament in open play, we didnt need defensive tactics. We needed to go out and score goals which we failed to do.

Sven systematically failed England, in the last world cup he should have gone after us losing not now. I dont know why or how he stayed so long.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 173.
  • At 05:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • mercs wrote:

This is my first time to be in England when a world cup is being held (I came from a country where basketball is the no.1 sport)... I am truly amazed by the support and enthusiasm of the English fans.. and disgusted by the negativity/pessimism by the media. My new theory why the players missed the penalty is that all the negative vibes being written and spoken by the media clouded the football field last Saturday thus affecting the England team. Maybe FA should have a meeting with the media people and asked them to nominate the manager and players whom they think can win the European Cup and World Cup and I think they cannot complete the list because even them cannot agree with each other...so many opinions...negative opinions.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 174.
  • At 05:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • James wrote:

Let's be honest. England's players do not have pace and guile when they're on the ball. We don't expect them to play like Brazilians or Argentinians but these qualities were seriously lacking. The way England plays is predictable.

As for formations, does it really make any sense to play defensively when it is obvious that the opposition is missing two key players?

I think England should stop playing lousy weak friendlies against easy opposition and concentrate on playing tough friendlies against better opposition.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 175.
  • At 05:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • stew wrote:

it's funny really we are all here there and everywhere moaning etc, there at home feet up with some extra cash to spend.
another bad taste left in our mouths.
i'm not even going to look for excuses
not even dissapointed (Well just a tad after the game)we was not up for the job end of really.
I don't and never will feel sorry for the players, the traveling fans get my vote of sympathy,.
what's more i'll be 51 bloody one next world cup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 176.
  • At 05:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jaap van de Burgt wrote:

I'm a big football-fan from Holland. I've watched the English leagua all year en saw the squad play on the WC. First I want to say that Eriksson has misused some players and has never come up with a team that makes sense. Like many other coaches of big teams, it was been proven again that playing defensively with on off the best teams on the WC doesn't pay. Look at Holland, Argentina, Brazil. I would also like to say that I don't understand why the media and all your hosts are talking about Rooney like he is the next best player in the world. Of course, he is a good player, but why put so much pressure on a young player who is not known for his excellent behaviour and mentallity. Talking him up so much will make him think he's the one player the whole nation is counting on, and will eventually not make him, but break him.
Greats Jaap

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 177.
  • At 05:21 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David Waterton wrote:

Hi, from sunny Scotland. Don鈥檛 worry I am not on to gloat. firstly my father was a Londoner so half of me and my family are English. My point ok points.

1 A poor manager who lacked judgement and bottle. He picked and played those players that the press dictated are the best available. Well, as any manager of any team will tell you: it isn鈥檛 always the best players that make up the best team. A balance is required. Sometimes a better individual player has to loose out to a better team player. Tactics.. i think he proved how bad he was during the games so i won't comment further

2. lets face it England struggled through the group and, I truly feel that if Ecuador would have actually believed they could have done England they would have

3. Portugal match. England clearly struggled against a team without arguably it鈥檚 best and indeed one of Europe鈥檚 finest midfield players: Deco. As for Rooney. I confess that at first I thought it was a harsh sending off but on reply it was clear that he deliberately put the boot into any area that makes my eyes water thinking about it. So don鈥檛 suddenly make a million excuses for him. If you or I did that to someone in the street we would expect to get locked up. As for trying to make Ronaldo the villain, give me a break. Rooney let himself, his team mates, manager and fans down all by himself. As we say up here 鈥測ou can take the boy out of the street but it ain鈥檛 so easy to take the street out of the boy"

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 178.
  • At 05:22 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Angel wrote:

I'm sorry Jen (146) but i have to say you are talking absolute ****. I think most of England can hold their hands up and say the players didn't play well as a team. We have not blamed the oppositions, apart from RIGHTLY the cheating portuguese...i'm sure even the ref from their previous game said our players needed to watch out! I think quite rightly we can blame the manager for his poor choice in squad selection, and if the ref had have blown when two cheating Portuguese players were kicking Rooney for 20 seconds before he kicked back then we would still have had 11 players on the pitch! Or maybe Rooney should have just fallen over like all the foreigners do instead of trying to play football like a man!

So England aren't in the same league as Brazil - mmm questionable as Brazil aren't in the final 4 either!

La Liga or Seria A - great if you want to watch a bunch of ballet dancers diving all over the place. Ronaldo would fit in great over at Real Madrid - Buenes Noches Ronaldo!

As for foreigners making the premiership as good as it is - i wish they weren't in our Premiership - or the number of foreigners per team should at least be limited.

I hope McClaren can make our great players a great team.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 179.
  • At 05:22 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Fillrobs wrote:

Lampard has lost his bottle since Ballack signed for Chelsea - he obviously is worried that he will be benched next season for Chelsea - he was our worst player all tournament and should have been dropped for the Sweden game onwards. Playing 4-1-4-1 against a depleted Portugal side showed a lack of belief that we could attack, Rooney left alone was just frustrating for him as well as us the fans. Once he was sent off we should have pushed 2 up front in Crouch and Walcott to attack and try and get a goal - Portugal rarely looked like scoring. Then to let Lampard take the 1st penalty was a major mistake as it knocked the confidence for the rest. Hargreaves was class and should keep his place in the team, with Gerrard as the attacking midfielder and Lampard as standby if he is on form. I thought Sven did well for us until this World Cup then picking Walcott but not playing him was a waste and not reacting to the situation saw us get knocked out.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 180.
  • At 05:23 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • George wrote:

English football is a lot like English politics: all spin and no substance. The media hype during the runup to the World Cup has been unbearable. Never mind all those other teams, the only question is by how many goals England was going to win the World Cup. In reality England are (and have for decades been) a mediocre side, the last few tournaments actually a fair reflection on their ability (among the top 10 sides, but certainly not good enopugh to win). What can be done? For starters, instead of paying 2.5 million per year to a Swede of questionable ability, how many young promising players could that money have been used to train, support, etc.? Instead of writing 100 million column inches about Beckham's hairstlye and what the WAGs get up to, how about critically analysing the players' performance ON THE PITCH?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 181.
  • At 05:23 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • r phillips wrote:

I'm no tactical expert. However, that hasn't stopped anyone else, particularly the array of assorted highly paid ex-pros on a jolly who fill the tv punditry couches, so here goes: if the england national football team is incapable of alternating between two or three different tactical formations and/or emphasis'(pl.?) of play, then they are not world class players. That's all.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 182.
  • At 05:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Terry wrote:

I think part of the problem could be that Sven was under pressure to pick the best english footballers available and then try to mould them into a team - as opposed to simply picking the best team. Gerrard and Lampard never seemed comfortable playing together. Parreira never allowed himself to be forced to playing Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Adriano, Kaka and Robinho all at the same time as many in Brazil in wanted - maybe we need someone stronger.

Also, if you tell a team of players that their team is only good if they have one man in it i.e. Rooney, then what is that going to do to their self-belief - after all, all sport is surely about confidence -and telling players they're worthless without only one man is not the way to motivate them. I was almost glad to see Beckham and Rooney go off and have the 'understudies' show what they could do - they seemed to blossom in finally being taken out of the stars shadows and taking the responsibility on themselves.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 183.
  • At 05:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DaveH wrote:

Post 162 - excellent points well made by an objective observer - Thanks for that Doug.
Everybody is getting carried away with all this - it's disappointing to lose, but we lost on the lottery of penalties - even with 10 men, we weren't outplayed. Even without playing to our potential, nobody really looked like beating us. When things aren't going well, you have to scrap for everything - I think all of the players gave it everything they could, and that's all you can ask. the only point in examining what went wrong is so that you don't make the same mistakes again.
No matter who they play for, cheats should be punished. C. Ronaldo is a cheat, as are most of his team mates - ask Holland - but the ref. was at fault as well. The incident should never have gone that far when Rooney was clearly fouled. If youngsters see cheats benefiting, then they will become cheats, because we come from a society where winning is all important. Let's face it, it's not the taking part that counts is it? That may make society sad, but that's how it is. The only way to ensure that football isn't taken over by cheats is to ensure that they don't prosper. BY THE WAY - that includes England - it's not like our players are averse to falling over when breathed on in the penalty area!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 184.
  • At 05:30 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jim Hopkins wrote:

The fact of the matter is we weren't good enough. Yes I was as gutted as any other England fan, but I cant remember a tournament where I felt more uninspired by Englands performances.

I cant put my finger on exactly why this was, but i feel Eriksson and his lack of touchline enthusiasm goes a long way, and also being told the same things over and over again.

Whilst it's easy to blame the portugese/rooney etc for our unfortunate exit, my thoughts on this are, England just were not good enough and if England want to win a major tournament we have to put up with this kind of goading and rise above it, it happens at major tournaments,. Have we really learned nothing since Beckham in 1998 ?

Lastly on a positive Note, Eriksson is gone, we STILL have a great team, and with Captain Terry in the heart of the defence, we have a wonderful future ahead of us. Also, There will be no more distractions from the Beckham Media Circus. Lets hope this brings to an end this sorry period in English football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 185.
  • At 05:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ben wrote:

Why England Didn't deserve to go further?

Awful Manager without a clue as to how to get even a decent game from some really good players. Weak, without direction and a fraud who has conned his employers and the many fans of England for too long (though not all as most people I know saw right through him a long time ago)

Dreadful Football Association who have not grasped the notion of the modern game and who do not have the pedigree to make the decisions they do. First they extend the contract of Erikson (when they could have sacked him) and then the farce which ended in McClaren being appointed.

Stupid tabloids who tap into the football pound and make ridiculous pre tournament predictions with a mix of xenaphobia and unwarranted hype. many of the people writing these articles can only be 'lads' who have no knowledge of the game and who develop opinion based on fad not fact (not criticisinng all of the journalists but not all of the rubbish written was on the back pages!)

Players who have got where they are on public profile (Beckham) Players who are over hyped without reason (Lampard), players who didn't play well nough to warrant keeping places game after game (Lampard and Beckham). Gobsmaking decision to not take an additionaal striker. No Captaincy on the pitch - Appoint Steven Gerrard now.

The Premier League is strong and it's not all down to imports. We will get better and once McClaren has been disposed of (I predict before Euro 2008) we will move on. I for one am so relieved that the Beckham/Erikson marriage is now over.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 186.
  • At 05:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Matt Henry wrote:

Without wanting to get into the wider argument about England's performance in the World Cup, I'm incredulous as to how any England fan, commentator, or journalist can possibly pour scorn over Ronaldo's reaction to an act that, off the football field, is likely to have been dealt with in court.

Stamping on someone's testicles is a dangerous and reckless act, and I can't ever imagine anyone in England lambasting Beckham if he had responded in the same way should Rooney's testicles have been stamped on. Indeed, the England team as a whole would probably have been censured as cowards had they not all waded in fists first.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 187.
  • At 05:33 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ajax wrote:

So much surprise, so much hurt, so much self-deception.

If there was a single ten minute period during any of the England games when we looked capable of winning the World Cup, then I must have been asleep for it. As an England fan for many years I've always approached each tournament with a sense of hope, yet at each successive disappointing display I'm struck by the fact that our players don't seem very intelligent compared to the opposition. Why do Beckham, Ferdinand and the rest all sound like Vicki Pollard?

It has been argued in previous comments that the 'blood and thunder' approach would serve England in top level tournaments. Yet a look at the winners of past tournaments suggests a more cerebral approach takes home the cup.

We can argue all we want about poor performances, bad luck and mediocre management, but I believe that until we get some players who can actually think their way through a match, we'll always be condemned to the second division of world football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 188.
  • At 05:33 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jim Hopkins wrote:

The fact of the matter is we weren't good enough. Yes I was as gutted as any other England fan, but I cant remember a tournament where I felt more uninspired by Englands performances.

I cant put my finger on exactly why this was, but i feel Eriksson and his lack of touchline enthusiasm goes a long way, and also being told the same things over and over again.

Whilst it's easy to blame the portugese/rooney etc for our unfortunate exit, my thoughts on this are, England just were not good enough and if England want to win a major tournament we have to put up with this kind of goading and rise above it, it happens at major tournaments,. Have we really learned nothing since Beckham in 1998 ?

Lastly on a positive Note, Eriksson is gone, we STILL have a great team, and with Captain Terry in the heart of the defence, we have a wonderful future ahead of us. Also, There will be no more distractions from the Beckham Media Circus. Lets hope this brings to an end this sorry period in English football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 189.
  • At 05:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Claire wrote:

Wayne Rooney's behaviour on that pitch was diabolical, in my opinion he should of controlled his temper and not let Rinaldo get to him (Rinaldo wasn't all wrong, Wayne did kick that guy in the B****).It was right for him to be sent off, he did it in front of the ref for heaven's sake, don't make excuses for him England. England was crap through out this World Cup and they just didn't deserve to win. What a bunch of over paid babies. They are all too busy looking in the mirror and modelling these days (YES YOU BECKS!!!!) that they've forgotten how to play football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 190.
  • At 05:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Z茅 wrote:

I鈥檝e been reading all these comments and I can only say I feel sorry for the English鈥 Why don鈥檛 you accept that your team wasn鈥檛 good enough, that your players, no matter how good they are thought to be, didn鈥檛 play well?

I see a lot of tendency to find escape-goats for your failures instead of being mature and assuming the flaws. That鈥檚 the only way to be better next time.

Regarding Cristiano Ronaldo, he did not need to do anything as the referee was pretty close to that coward aggression and was able to evaluate for himself. More, Ronaldo has no power to force the referee to show a red card! Now I keep reading in the pathetic British press that he winked after Rooney being expelled, and all sort of conspiracy theories... Grow up!

If the opposite was to happen all would praise Ronnie for the expulsion of Ronaldo鈥

The truth is that England could not beat a crippled Portuguese team, which lacked two of the most important players. No, we didn鈥檛 play well, but after England鈥檚 friendly Russian referee (who crippled badly Portugal and Holland for a future match against England) what would be expected? Most of our players had yellow cards and are at risk of missing the final if we win France. Of course we had to be cautious.

Also, when England was left with ten players the only thing they did was to become a 9 defenders team. Portugal played almost all game in disadvantage against Holland and we were never stuck in our area, and always tried to play the full field. That鈥檚 the difference between Portugal and England. Despite all, we tried and never shown fear.

To end, Ronaldo owes obedience to Portugal not to M.U. or any team, especially in a world cup. M.U. is just an employer and Portugal his NATION.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 191.
  • At 05:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David wrote:

It really frustrates me when people moan about and blame the circumstances that seem to force England鈥檚 early exit from major competitions. Complaining that we fall ill of penalty shootouts, red cards, keeper errors, injuries, cheating opposition etc etc etc. The fact of the matter is that the reason we always have to battle so hard against all odds is that we do not play well enough to win comfortably.
I honestly do believe that the current crop of England players are the best we've had for 30 years. The fact that these players play so well for their club sides and are so lacklustre for England is surely proof of Eriksson鈥檚 negligence. He played too negatively, made terrible and at times baffling substitutions, and his selection was often so obviously wrong that we all had to assume he had a secret master plan. He did not.
I cannot remember a single occasion where Eriksson has made an offensively minded team change or attacking substitution to kill a game off, preferring to always make defensive changes to protect a slim lead. Perhaps this is a hangover from his time managing in Serie A, as may be his fear of encouraging progressive attacking football. Players like Steven Gerrard were given far too much defensive instruction, rendering them incapable of creating goals, and defeating the object of fielding a holding midfielder.
The only silver lining to this world cup failure is the departure of Eriksson and the new era that it brings. However, the press need to put some important questions to Steve Mclaren to find out what he will do differently, and to ensure that he is not just an Eriksson Mk II.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 192.
  • At 05:38 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David wrote:

It really frustrates me when people moan about and blame the circumstances that seem to force England鈥檚 early exit from major competitions. Complaining that we fall ill of penalty shootouts, red cards, keeper errors, injuries, cheating opposition etc etc etc. The fact of the matter is that the reason we always have to battle so hard against all odds is that we do not play well enough to win comfortably.
I honestly do believe that the current crop of England players are the best we've had for 30 years. The fact that these players play so well for their club sides and are so lacklustre for England is surely proof of Eriksson鈥檚 negligence. He played too negatively, made terrible and at times baffling substitutions, and his selection was often so obviously wrong that we all had to assume he had a secret master plan. He did not.
I cannot remember a single occasion where Eriksson has made an offensively minded team change or attacking substitution to kill a game off, preferring to always make defensive changes to protect a slim lead. Perhaps this is a hangover from his time managing in Serie A, as may be his fear of encouraging progressive attacking football. Players like Steven Gerrard were given far too much defensive instruction, rendering them incapable of creating goals, and defeating the object of fielding a holding midfielder.
The only silver lining to this world cup failure is the departure of Eriksson and the new era that it brings. However, the press need to put some important questions to Steve Mclaren to find out what he will do differently, and to ensure that he is not just an Eriksson Mk II.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 193.
  • At 05:40 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • bryan wrote:

A view from Dublin.England have the players to win a major championship,look at greece.The blinkers applied by the media and the false analysis after the first round games did not help.Over here we heard from neutral commentators who, believe it or not, wanted england to progress but could not fathom the team selections,tactics,lack of forwards or honest appraisal of Englands performance.One last piont ,Englands group was proberly too easy as the team was not tested early enough and therefore not battle hardened

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 194.
  • At 05:40 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Barnsy wrote:

The FA should never have appointed a Swede as England manager.

In my opinion all national teams should have a national manager and staff. i.e. England should have a English manager.

I think this is one of the reasons England performed so badly in this world cup because Sven had nothing to loose and gambled with stupid decisions.

Sven got 25million for giving us nothing and i am sure he is laughing all the way to the bank.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 195.
  • At 05:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • TK wrote:

Hi,

It was a honest comment from KM, I agree with it. During all these years I have never seen an English team playing to win the match, they always come on ground with the mind set not to loose and that is where the problem is.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 196.
  • At 05:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • david wrote:

It really frustrates me when people moan about and blame the circumstances that seem to force England鈥檚 early exit from major competitions. Complaining that we fall ill of penalty shootouts, red cards, keeper errors, injuries, cheating opposition etc etc etc. The fact of the matter is that the reason we always have to battle so hard against all odds is that we do not play well enough to win comfortably.
I honestly do believe that the current crop of England players are the best we've had for 30 years. The fact that these players play so well for their club sides and are so lacklustre for England is surely proof of Eriksson鈥檚 negligence. He played too negatively, made terrible and at times baffling substitutions, and his selection was often so obviously wrong that we all had to assume he had a secret master plan. He did not.
I cannot remember a single occasion where Eriksson has made an offensively minded team change or attacking substitution to kill a game off, preferring to always make defensive changes to protect a slim lead. Perhaps this is a hangover from his time managing in Serie A, as may be his fear of encouraging progressive attacking football. Players like Steven Gerrard were given far too much defensive instruction, rendering them incapable of creating goals, and defeating the object of fielding a holding midfielder.
The only silver lining to this world cup failure is the departure of Eriksson and the new era that it brings. However, the press need to put some important questions to Steve Mclaren to find out what he will do differently, and to ensure that he is not just an Eriksson Mk II.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 197.
  • At 05:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tony .L wrote:

Sven seen England coming.Just a pity it wasnt the other way round!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 198.
  • At 05:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jen wrote:

To Angel - Brazil have won the World Cup 5 times. And god knows how many quarters and semi's they have played in.
People like you are just hypocrites. Either you judge a team on it's merits THIS tournament only - in which case you deserved to go out when you did - and in fact were lucky to even be there. Or you judge teams on their consistent past performance - which I think we know the answer to that already. Winning the cup once 40 yearsw ago means nothing to FIFA rankings, or anyone else apart from the English fans and the English media.

And as for this belief that ONLY Englad don't dive - well there is plenty of teams/countries who don't...and need I mention Gerrard?!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 199.
  • At 05:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tony .L wrote:

Sven seen England coming.Just a pity it wasnt the other way round!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 200.
  • At 05:44 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • neophyteveritas wrote:

R Phillips - the plural is 'emphases'!
As for the rest - hmm, have you all not figured out that it's the media to blame? They keep telling you that England have Lord knows how many 'World Class' footballers, when in reality England players are streets behind the best in Europe in terms of technique and skill. AND, you all go on about the sending off - how many have realised that England played miles better without Beckham and the overblown and petulant Rooney?
You got rid of the Swede, and Becks went before he was pushed (3 years late); now forget Rooney and you might have a team worth talking about.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 201.
  • At 05:45 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • stevefos wrote:

Jen, the only people who were saying that we would win the world cup were the predominantly red top media, which you obviously took to reflect the nations opinion. The vast majority of England fans, including the 80000 or so who went to Germany just had great hopes. Yes those were not realalised this time but those hopes will not diminish despite people like yourself who want to believe the hype and like to kick a countreys spirit when it is down. I hope you take off your rose tinted glasses when you watch the semi finals as I suspect you might see like the rest of real football fans the culmination of what has been a very average tournament. The teams that performed well in the group stages have all now gone home (Argentina and Spain) and we are left with four relatively average teams (albeit better than England) who will play not too lose rather than play to win.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 202.
  • At 05:45 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • andrew mcloughlin wrote:

Do we have any intelligent footballers?-I don't mean intelligent people who happen to play international football-if so who?
Why not start a CAMPAIGN- "let's kick pundits out of football"- who to keep?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 203.
  • At 05:46 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • david wrote:

It really frustrates me when people moan about and blame the circumstances that seem to force England鈥檚 early exit from major competitions. Complaining that we fall ill of penalty shootouts, red cards, keeper errors, injuries, cheating opposition etc etc etc. The fact of the matter is that the reason we always have to battle so hard against all odds is that we do not play well enough to win comfortably.
I honestly do believe that the current crop of England players are the best we've had for 30 years. The fact that these players play so well for their club sides and are so lacklustre for England is surely proof of Eriksson鈥檚 negligence. He played too negatively, made terrible and at times baffling substitutions, and his selection was often so obviously wrong that we all had to assume he had a secret master plan. He did not.
I cannot remember a single occasion where Eriksson has made an offensively minded team change or attacking substitution to kill a game off, preferring to always make defensive changes to protect a slim lead. Perhaps this is a hangover from his time managing in Serie A, as may be his fear of encouraging progressive attacking football. Players like Steven Gerrard were given far too much defensive instruction, rendering them incapable of creating goals, and defeating the object of fielding a holding midfielder.
The only silver lining to this world cup failure is the departure of Eriksson and the new era that it brings. However, the press need to put some important questions to Steve Mclaren to find out what he will do differently, and to ensure that he is not just an Eriksson Mk II.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 204.
  • At 05:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Lucy wrote:

Referring to the headline on the 成人快手 website 'Ronaldo rejects Rooney row'....Ronaldo says to ignore the English press who are trying to create confusion.....what rubbish!

We saw it all with our own eyes, long before any member of the English press, or from any other country, had chance to write about it!

I hope Alex Ferguson shows some sense and loyalty to Wayne Rooney, not to mention all Manchester Utd fans, and does the decent thing in sending Ronaldo on his way.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 205.
  • At 05:48 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Chris wrote:

To add to the matter, i knew it would happen. The media made a massive hype about it. In World Cup 1978 Scotland did exactly the same thing woith the media claming Scotland would win the world cup! The similartis are endless.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 206.
  • At 05:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Patrick wrote:

It surprises me how so many people consider Englands World Cup performance to be a failure. 32 countries qualified for the world, and only 4 countries have done better than England. The expectation for England to do well is not justified when you look at history. Of the 18 world cups that have occurred, England have done better than the quarter finals on only two occasions. This years performance measures up quite well when compared with other world cups. The European championships make even more grim reading. England did better than the group stages on only 3 occasions, have never been to a final. My point is that people should be more realistic about Englands chances of winning the world cup in the future.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 207.
  • At 05:55 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ryan wrote:

For those who critised England fans over in Germany, I am afraid what you read in our press is far from the truth. I was over in Germany for the first 4 games, and saw no problems at all. Of all the arrests how many have been charged?? Barely any. The reason the numbers were so high compared to other countries, was the simple fact the no other country follows there team like England.

As for the rest of the tournament I am following Germany. They made us all feel welcome and enjoyed many plesent beers with them. Shame I didn't realise they were so nice until I was over there.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 208.
  • At 05:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Martin wrote:

I think for the first time in a major championship that despite the media hype I was just waiting for England to be knocked out. Before we started I expected a QF as in previous tournaments. Why? Because nothing has significantly changed since 2002 and 2004.

1. We still have the issue of fitting the midfield trio of Lampard, Beckham and Gerrard into whatever system is the flavour of the day.
There are some points to consider here. These players have never combined well. Just because they are influential players at club level does not mean that this counts at National level. Dropping one or two of these players and bringing in Nolan from Bolton or using Hargreaves more may have balanced the team better and could have been tried in the countless friendlies during Sven's reign. No player in that midfield should be considered first choice based upon who they are. It should be on merit and open to all.
Another point, not wishing to excuse them but both Lampard and Gerrard have had extremely long seasons? Hargreaves at least had less matches and a mid-winter break.

2. Is this team that good? Would the inclusion of some 'lesser' players have bonded the team better? Will this team ever get any better regardless of who is coaching? Is it just a case of this is as good as it gets with this group of players? Or is it to do with no self belief? Do we need hungry, fresh young players to breathe fresh life into this team? And a hungry, motivated manager. (The FA should only pay England managers a basic salary with bonuses coming in performance related payments)

3. England don't travel well. Unlike teams like Brazil, Argentina who play alot of 'away' friendlies, England tend to stay at home. I think that more away games without the home fans support against decent opposition may improve the team rather than pointless friendlies at home against poor opposition.

4. We need to resurect either 4-4-2 or use wingers and go 4-3-3. We have the personnel who play these systems week in week out. Stick at what you know and focus on making it better.

5. The management team needs a clearout. The FA needs to look at how they can keep the coaching fresh and how they can motivate and focus the team better. My worry as is most's is that alot of the decisions taken during this campaign were that of Steve McLaren and not Sven. Although I rate Stewart Downing as a club player and perhaps one for the future, for the life of me I don't know how he made the squad (Obviously his ex-club manager helped).

6. The media. What can you say? Well to blame them is blinkered. Most footballing nations have similar coverage ie) Mexico, Brazil, Italy...Isn't it just the same everywhere else?

Who do I want to win? I never thought I'd here myself saying this but, Germany. Of any team that I have watched they have battled, worked hard and as a lot of people have posted been good value in every match...and all this with every pundit saying that they had only '1' world class player in the team in Ballack. As with Greece in 2004, a team is much more effective than world class individuals.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 209.
  • At 06:03 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • EKI IDOR wrote:

I think it鈥檚 an absolute disgrace that England supporters should be blaming Ronaldo for one of their own players鈥 petulant, asinine and pugilistic behaviour!!

If it had been Ronaldo stamping on Lampard and Rooney had rushed to the referee to evoke the law of the game would the English be condemning Rooney the same way they have Ronaldo because they are on the same team?

Sven pleaded with the press not to torture another golden boy but it seems that the press and fans already have their tentacles out for another who is only 2 years older than Rooney.

Ronaldo did what any INTERNANTIONAL player would do, country comes before club and judging by the reaction of English supporters, I think they will agree.

EDEKI IDOLLOR

S LONDON

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 210.
  • At 06:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DH wrote:

I think there is a basic problem with English football. We listen to a very fickle media telling us how great the premiership is, how magnificent the players are, possibly the greatest set of players ever to play the game blah blah blah. And we believe them. The media puts so much pressure on the FA and the manager it is likly that THEY pick the team. They certainly seem to influence decision making. How can any national team succeed when thay get so idolised and victimised in the same day on the same channel. Prior to the WC when everyone said England would win the tournament I spoke to some French, German and Argentinian friends and asked them what their media thought of England's chances. They all thought England were a good solid team capable of beating anyone in a one off match but when it came down to it they just were not good enough to win. We, however, refuse to accept others opinions and continually over-hype the players, putting obscene pressure on the players and management. I can't see this changing for a while and I don't think SMC will be the man to unify (or more correctly pacify) the media. England have a good bunch of players that are nearly world class, but they ar not there yet. The media will not help this process so it will take one hell of a manager to be able to combine all the footballing knowledge with handling the media pressure. As I said I, would like it, but I don't think SMC is going to be that man.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 211.
  • At 06:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Robert wrote:

I totally agree.
The England team is lacking any form of creativity. Joe Cole tries to be creative with useless moves, Frank Lampard can only shoot, Beckham is burned up, Gerrard does all the defensive work Cole, Lampard and Beckham can't do.
Upfront Rooney wasn't fit, Owen wasn't fit, Crouch is a second rank striker without any pace, skill or scoring ability and Theo Wallcot has never played a Premiership match in his life.
In the back there's an out of form Ashley Cole and a mediocre rightback. The central defenders lack passing skills.
Behind them is an insecure goalkeeper who didn't look any better than the goalkeeper of Ghana.
This England team is so extremely flat. Beckham and Owen used to be the peaks, without them there's no one capable of creating anything.
The only solution would've been to passionately play kick-and-rush.
But England tries to play the continental passing game without knowing where, when or at who to pass.

I think Sven should've been sacked 4 years ago. All he did was play the big names. He didn't have the guts to leave one or more out. He never played a team that worked together towards scoring a goal.
The players on the ball had no idea what to do with it.

England should appoint a manager who does know how to set-up a team. Who recognizes the problems and solves them. I think there's only one person fit for the job: Martin O'neill and otherwise it should be a foreigner who consistently has shown he can make a (small) club win by playing with guts.

NB. I think Sven was a disgrace to English football with all the love and business affairs he had. Honest man my bottoms.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 212.
  • At 06:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ryan Mann wrote:

Its a simple at this, this was Englands best chance of winning the World Cup in a long time. Most experts would look at the English teamsheet and say on paper england have the individuals that could and arguably should win the world cup. But the bottom line is they just couldnt gel as a team and it cost them. Even with an easier group than most group and a favourable 2nd round tie, England simply did not perform well enough in any match to deserve a world cup semi-final place.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 213.
  • At 06:09 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Alan wrote:

The TURNIP was bad enough, but the SWEDE was absolutely terrible.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 214.
  • At 06:10 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Robert wrote:

BTW there aren't any ghetto's in Holland and Bergkamp, Van Nistelrooij or Robben certainly did not grow up in any.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 215.
  • At 06:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Doc wrote:

The hype has been phenomenal over how good the England team was and Portugal was already beaten and the semi final set up against Brazil. England dont respect the teams that they play and neither does the media. The 成人快手 should have had one more audio option during their matches and that would have been natural sound because the biased opnion offered by the specialist was just too much.

The one thing that will never make me support England is the fact that this god given right to beat everybody when really a closer examination of the players is that England is an average side with a few exceptions who are never really played in their right positions.

The blame towards Sven being a quiet person on the sidelines and not barking orders cannot possibly help when then players themselves dont have the passion to play for England. There is no personal financial gain for them. Then there is no difference in watching the under 10's playing with the Mums and Dads shouting from the sidelines and most of the time it has no impact whatsoever apart from confused children being told to run here and there.

Playing for a succesful team is based on being part of a team and not me me me.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 216.
  • At 06:12 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • r phillips wrote:

I don't doubt you saw it Lucy... question is Do you actually know what you saw? I'd like to know why the 成人快手 edited the pre-match Ronaldo nuzzle on Rooney when they replayed it so that the joke was lost. Would also be interested to hear the likes of Gerrard try and justify his statements to the newsmedia that he'd seen Ronaldo giving it the imaginary card... People talk crap... England bottled it again. Ronaldo was cool enough to take penalties for Germany. I look forward to him ramming all this rubbish back down English throats - another penalty would be perfect - and I can't tell you how much I hope he does it in the United shirt next season.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 217.
  • At 06:14 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • tim ( stuttgart ) wrote:

What I don't understand is all these
clever comments about taking walcott.
I think he was picked for the same reason that Klinsmann picked david odonkor above other better strikers -because he is very fast - and that could prove to be just what is
wanted in a certain situation. Can
anybody say what at what time could for example defoe have been played - instead of whom and what difference it would have made ?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 218.
  • At 06:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • R. Hamer wrote:

It seems to me that the coaching staff didn't adjust their tactics to fit the Portuguese match. It was apparent from the Ecuador match that Rooney was not comfortable as a lone striker and was very frustrated in that role. After Rooney's loss Crouch did well in that single striker role even with ten players. The Portuguese mid field was much weakened with the loss of Deco so England could afford to drop one of the "mid field stars" for a second striker. Rooney adds mid field strength also since he likes to move back into the mid field mix. In addition the overly cautious formation increased the likelihood that England would have to go on based on penalty kicks, not a proven team strength.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 219.
  • At 06:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Laura wrote:

I was neither disheartened or gutted by englands exit. Come on wat did we expect with a manager who doesnt encourage attacking play, a team whos formation was absurd and a series of sluggish and lack lusted performances. It was as though the lads out there didnt want to win at times even with 11 men. However, saying this i dnt blame the players (i know us english have a habit of this but i really believe it wasnt their fault!) How can players play wen their out of position and in the middle of experimenting with formations which shud have been tryed and tested by the useless manager months ago!

Im a MASSIVE manu fan but i was DISGUSTED by Ronaldo, i saw him for wat he truley was - an actor and a sneek! Us english are too polite! we dnt go rolling around in agony on the floor wen our legs gets hit then hold our arm or groin! We do NOT surround the ref and i believe players who do shud instantly get a yellow card, ronaldo disgusted me! Hes his team mate and friend! get out of english football! Scumbag!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 220.
  • At 06:18 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Nick wrote:

I'm a England die-hard fans. I used to get hurt from England in every big event European Cup, World Cup for many 10 years.

I don't see England still can win a Champion in my lifetime if we are still without confidence in penalty. No team can be said the best team if she don't know how to kick in the penalty and save enemies' shootout. Do you all see Germany's penalty? They win in penalty always. Why? Because of CONFIDENCE.

We have talent, skills, experience but NO CONFIDENCE. We don't need any more great players, we don't need any more better planning, we don't need increasing the prize.

We ONLY need a NEW COACH, who can give confidence & agressiveness to all the players such as Mourinho, Hiddink. We don't want any LOCAL coach anymore. They can't give confidence to them because they even can't shoot in the penalty.

England fans pls all stand up force FA to reselect a new coach for our coming European Cup. I don't want to see our ever-best England team lost again. I wish Beckham can win a champion in nation before he retires. He worths to get it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 221.
  • At 06:19 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Zuned wrote:

I feel we had the team of players to get far this WC. But Sven didn't play them in the right way. What was he thinking by bringing along young boy Walcott who has never kicked a ball in the premiership has no experiance at that level of football! Sven would have been better off bringing one of Wigans strikers (no offence meant!) at least they have experiance in playing top level football against premiership defence and defenders like Terry and Ferdinand..who by the way were brilliant through-out the tournament.

The formation was all wrong, don't get me wrong im not an expert..but after watching Rooney play in the lone ranger position for 30min you instantly relise he's not suited there and needs a linking player if we have any chance of scoring!!

so overall I blame Sven being a useless manager, its not his fualt though..thats all he knows.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 222.
  • At 06:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • jim warren wrote:

WE all have our own opinion about how england played but what more concerns me was how the world cup was played by all the other nation. Now i know england players do dive but they do not see this as an important part of the way the game is played. Can you name me another sport where 32 different teams from all over the world try to trick week referees into sending other playes off or awarding them penalties? Thsi has got to the lvel where i am not sure if i can continue watching international football. FIFA have turned the game into a joke full of histrionics and play acting. I am glad i din't waste my money on going over to germany. Many of my friends did and had a great time. Thet even talked to many different nations football fans.

Many of the fans couldn't understand why our team didn't cheat and even told my friends you will win nothing without cheatin!

At least we know now this wasn't true, we wouldn't of won the world cup with 11 maradona'a. Roll on start of the competition where Drogba got booed by his own fans for cheating, having said that i suppose it is only a matter of time before the premiership is ruined. I'm going to start watching Kidderminster in the conference.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 223.
  • At 06:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Doc wrote:

The hype has been phenomenal over how good the England team was and Portugal was already beaten and the semi final set up against Brazil. England dont respect the teams that they play and neither does the media. The 成人快手 should have had one more audio option during their matches and that would have been natural sound because the biased opnion offered by the specialist was just too much.

The one thing that will never make me support England is the fact that this god given right to beat everybody when really a closer examination of the players is that England is an average side with a few exceptions who are never really played in their right positions.

The blame towards Sven being a quiet person on the sidelines and not barking orders cannot possibly help when then players themselves dont have the passion to play for England. There is no personal financial gain for them. Then there is no difference in watching the under 10's playing with the Mums and Dads shouting from the sidelines and most of the time it has no impact whatsoever apart from confused children being told to run here and there.

Playing for a succesful team is based on being part of a team and not me me me.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 224.
  • At 06:25 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Damien wrote:

I'm sick to death of the english whining after every time they get knocked out of a competition. Did it ever cross anyone's minds that all the so called world class players are just over-hyped.....by their own media! I'll admit Rooney looks to have a great future, but the likes of Beckham who England play better without should've been on the bench from the start. Lampard is a great player, but don't forget he's surrounded by great players at Chelsea. And as for the strikers, not one of them world-class. You can't win a world cup when you are restricted to striking the ball from at least 25 yards. England had only 1 goal scored inside the box during the world cup!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 225.
  • At 06:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Lets face it England had a decent run at this world cup handed on a plate.

Due to FIFAs arcane seeding system they never meet any nation of consequence (lets face it - of the available sides you would choose Ecuador) until the QF stage and then they bow out bravely on penalties, to the second weakest team left, without half of their first choice midfield.

Sven's muddled thinking in selection and tactics spoiled a great chance, golden generation or not. Why pick out of form/injured players on history or reputation alone (Beckham, Owen, Campbell, Ash Cole.

Why change system every match. The plethora of friendlies is the time to experiment.

Why pick a teenager with no 1st team Premiership experience unseen? He could have travelled for the experience without taking a scarce squad place FFS.

The Premiership is a victory of hype over substance, have English clubs dominated Europe since the early eighties? No.

Are good club players necessarily world class? No.

And face facts Ronaldo did exactly what any England player would have done if the same foul had been committed by a Portugal player.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 226.
  • At 06:27 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • bobbylebonfire wrote:

been following all the posts and i was absolutely AMAZED that it took 46 posts until the first gloating scot turned up! Gobsmacked isn't the word..they usually in the first 10, whats the matter scots, a bit slow off the mark? Ahhh..thats why you never achieve anything..sorry, gold medal in salt-rubbing? I apologise! That was swiftly followed by further scots "i'm not a gloating scot, but...!" But at least the scots were faster off the mark than the portugese who only came in at 86 but made up for it in numbers, there weren't enough so joao posted the same blog about 4 times while waiting for reinforcements and we're not even at half time! Aha! a new topic now, Alan Shearer's 'incitement to violence' (by the way, everyone, he said he wouldn't be surprised if rooney were to...hardly an incitement to violence, more an appraisal of hard fact!)..and on and on..with the england fans doing a probably better job than all of them.Looks like it's going to penalties..

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 227.
  • At 06:31 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

From my humble point of view, as I know nothing about this game's rules or tactics, I understand your sorrow.
But I can麓t understand the way some of you talk about your team. We were no better team down there on the field. We finished equally defeated... maybe even more because we couldn麓t score even when Rooney went out. By the way, why is it C.Ronaldo's fault if Rooney has a bad temper? Wouldn't an English player do exactly what he did and ask for a penalty? There, he was playing for Portugal, for his homeland, not for United!! And Rooney was trying to send the most hard-working portuguese player in the game out.
But, this is not the objective of my comment. I write to tell all of you English fans about our goal-keeper, Ricardo. Did you know that in Portugal he is considered a lousy keeper. He plays for my team, the Sporting SCP, and there he had a terrible year, and even got to be replaced. But when he plays for Portugal, he just grows so much and defends whatever comes... even though many here say he just has a good defense to support him. But Scolari never took his support away and believes in him like no one else. And that is why he does well. Because he is confident and knows his coach backs him in good and bad moments.
I am a teacher here in Portugal, and this much I know from my experience, no none does well when all are saying that he can麓t. This is called emotional intelligence... you can shine if you know you are supported.
Get a good coach, and support your team. They are a good team. Hargreaves was fantastic, just as Carvalho and Ricardo were!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 228.
  • At 06:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David O' Calllaghan wrote:

England has the players but the players played with no passion and there is only one person to blame for these lacklustre performances and that is the clueless Swen.
You have heard about good managers been able to get the best out of their average players (e.g Martin O' Neill), but Swen has somehow reversed that trait and managed to get the worst out of his best players.
Look at performances of Lampard and Terry with Chelsea or Gerrard with Liverpool, how can they not produce this for Swen. They have no respect for him or his decisions; look at his decision to bring 4 strikers and of this four, 2 injured strikers and one striker who never played in the premiership???? What was that about? In a way England going out on penalties was a blessing for Swen as who was he going to play up front in the next game? Crouch has the long Striker for 90 minutes was his only option?
Of course there is no light at the end of the tunnel, as the fa association who appointed the joke Swen have appointed the guy who has been learning from him for the last 6 years, the guy who before his team came back from 3-0 down against weak opposition was not fit to be the Middlesbrough manager? That is who you are stuck with now, swens number 2, Steve Mcclaren. Is this not another mistake?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 229.
  • At 06:39 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jim wrote:

I am a Scot and was supporting England at the weekend, it was a tragedy indeed and England did not deserve to progress in the tournament.
The irony of the match being on the anniversary of the battle of the Somme was not lost on me. Lions led by halfwits. Errikson was a joke and displayed no leadership, he is the reason England did not progress.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 230.
  • At 06:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • valur wrote:

Bring back Luke Chadwick in to the english squad and then, only then they will spark fear in the eyes of the other teams, and will be able to win the WC

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 231.
  • At 06:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • bobbylebonfire wrote:

i wrote one of my best well-researched and funny blogs and it didn't get posted! Moderator, I say, Moderator!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 232.
  • At 06:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • KPS wrote:

okay,lets take a look at the bigger picture...
The state of international football
is pretty dire,lets look
at the 4 teams in the semis...
Germany/Italy compared to the
legendary sides in their history are
at best average,only Ballack would
come close to a respective hall of
fame.
France Zidane,Makele,Thuran had to
come out of retirement so they
could scrape through into the
tournament edging past Swiss,Irish,
Israel.
Portugal,probably about as good a
team as they have ever had ??
Where are the young superstars to
emerge from 2006 ??
World's best players according to
votes 1 Ronaldhino 2 Lampard,they
might as well have tossed it off
on the golf course.
About 10 contries will look at
whoever wins this cup and think
it could have been us ..3 in the
semis who don't win Arg,Bra,Eng,
Holl,Esp,Mex,Swiss,even Aussies, because the difference is minimal.
Yes England do leave something to be
desired but they could have won
this cup because of the lack of any
great teams.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 233.
  • At 06:43 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • paul2122 wrote:

am i the only one who remebers that last year it was Shaun WP who was the saviour for the right hand side... what happened to him? Now its Aarron Lenon, able to beat a player but did not put in one decent cross in the game. At least Beckham can cross a ball, and it would be interesting to hear exactly how many direct assists he has in getting England anywhere over the last 5/6 years. It just pisses me off that because of his lifestyle and the media circus that follows him everyone is clamouring for his head... again! Yes he had a bad world cup, but apart from the 2 centre backs and Owen Hargreves (who having been booed, is now a favourite) who didnt. Beckham is definitely worth his place until someone can show they can perform as he has for longer than a couple of games.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 234.
  • At 06:46 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • dean wrote:

message to number 3 i think youve just proved to every reader of this that you are not a true england fan even if though they did play shocking!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 235.
  • At 06:48 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • chris wrote:

Can't really argue with any of the views expressed to date. We are clueless and everything to do with our football is over-hyped.

Basic skills such as passing, movement, support, moving back and forwards as a unit are sadly lacking. I do a bit of youth coaching and once 11-year olds are forced to play 11-a-side on adult pitches is it any wonder that all we can do is run around aimlessly and 'hoof' the ball a long way. Unless we address things as grass-roots level and encourage players to express themselves at an early age then our players will never be strong enough to compete at the highest level.


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 236.
  • At 06:50 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dion Protani wrote:

Watching the game on Saturday, it suddenly dawned on me that football has finally changed too much. We can argue the toss all day over who has better players etc, but I don't think that matters in football anymore. When the laws are such that a team like Portugal with their pathetic antics can progress to the last 4 of a tournament ahead of much more deserving teams, it shows that the rules are unfair and wrong. Portugal succeeded not at football, but at some other game. A game where if somebody so much as touches you, you must fall to the floor and pretend you're in agaony. Does anyone really believe the players are genuinely hurt when they do this? Of course not, but FIFA with their laws have given the more unscrupulous players and managers the green light to use this tactic. Who wants to watch this drivel? If you saw acting like that on TV you would turn over immediately. British teams have always displayed a great ethic in this respect, by rather than rolling around in agony trying to get your opponent sent off, a player would traditionally get up, dust themselves down and get on with it. This attititude exists in any game you care to wish on any park throughout the UK every weekend. We're told that the English are naive because we don't cheat properly and that we should adopt the modern continental methods of play. You can see this has started to happen already when a player like Joe Cole (managed by a Portuguese manager co-incidentally) dives to the floor if anyone so much as makes contact with him. THIS HAS TO STOP NOW. Let's be proud of our football heritage and the blood and guts style of our football. Let FIFA have their own "Hybrid Football", and we can have Association Football back, the game that we all love. Obviously it will never happen, but our FA should be brave and split from FIFA and it's competitions. If other teams want to come and play against us at the game we invented they can do so only on the understanding that they play the game properly. If they don't want to come, who cares? International football is boring now and so far removed from reality that it's laughable. Leave the continental teams to their play acting and let us get back to watching the Football we all know and love. These are not the rantings of an old fogey harking back to the good old days, and not a xenophobic middle Englander. I'm just a genuine football fan and I want our footie back to normal!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 237.
  • At 06:51 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • PAT wrote:

I am still at the deeply deeply depressed stage - even though I truly knew that we really couldn't do it from the moment they stepped out on the pitch against Paraguay - the list of things going against an England victory is immense
1. More foreigners than English playing in the Premier League
2. Going without enough strikers.
3. Not exactly an inspiring manager
4. The "English" disease (which Andy Murray seems to have as well) - choking
5. Not enough English players with International experience
6. FEAR

I have many other comments but to be fair the rant I have inside is book length!!!
and by the way -
Penalties are not difficult - take some lessons from the Germans

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 238.
  • At 06:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Joe wrote:

Okay so we got knocked out by the lottery of penalties (although Germany make it look so easy)a lottery/a coin toss we were very close to the semi finals there.

However to be a team that will go beyond the current level we have to play with players that can pass the ball, and I'm not talking Beckham/Gerrard/Lampard hollywood passes over 60 yards either, I'm talking neat little passes and link play, the kind of stuff that joe Cole, Carrick and Lennon were trying to play. posession of the ball is key, look at all the teams that consistently do well.

One final point, congratulations to Owen Hargreaves for ramming all the rubbish that was written about him back down the throats of those in the media that questioned his ability. I don't blame the fans for believing what they read about him but those in a position to voice an opinion in the national press should look beyond the boarders and realise that there is a whole world of football out there, this tournament has proved that there is clearly some better football than our own "Brand (tm) England".

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 239.
  • At 06:53 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • chris wrote:

What a dissapoimtment, ive sat here an read thru many of these comments. An what i noticed is the fact that nobody seems of gave the boys a chance. i know The football was not fantastic, and our route to portugal, was like chelsea v Berwick (no offence). I hope Macca turn this around and select players for there capabilities rather than names or reputations, I'm a Boro fan an seen hime use a 4 2 4 formation an it worked twice over. why the git from Sweden did not at least try a 4 4 2 is beyond me

My last point would not be to blame Rooney either, anyone who plays rugby would no that it was not stamp, he was being dragged back by 2 of them an was simply pushing of an away, like a fighter he is, he did not go down because that's the kind of man he is, i would say 80% of the blame lies with his so called team mate.

as for now it's back to the premiership, "Come on Boro"

and good luck for future England

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 240.
  • At 06:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Omar Malik wrote:

Fallen Hero's???? I think not...
Atleast in previous World Cups England have shown belief and passion...It seemed as if the England team had no soul...I've heard the pundits say that England were due a good preformance...How they came to that conclusion is beyond me..What is comes down to is that we needed Churchill to rally the troops and not Sven...we needed someone to say "The world is watching you..stand up and be counted"...Barring O Hargreeves, I couldent see where that inspiration was going to come from...I cant really blame the players but what use is it to blame the manager..he's made his money!!!

And as for the future I hope being Sven's No 2 has taught Steve something..

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 241.
  • At 07:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dan Smith wrote:

Oh for crying out loud.

We played one of the most skillful teams in world football. For half the match we had ten men. They had one of the best managers in world football.

We created the better chances, if you don't think that is good then i think you are on a windup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 242.
  • At 07:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Gubs wrote:

Yeah, I like what you have to say Ben. I too am filled with bitterness and sadness. I managed to blank it out for the rest of the weekend, but then this morning I felt my eyes welling up like John Terry. Monday mornings, that's when workers are meant to gather round the water-cooler, cement-mixer or whatever, and revel in the weekend's events. And what have we got? Nothing. At the end of the day Butcher's right, we're just not very good.

This is six years I've been planning for this. I was one of those who supported Erikkson's appointment. Every bit of daily football news I ingest I consider how that will affect England's fortunes. Japan 2002, I knew didn't matter, the quarter-finals was okay, it was all about Europe, Germany 2006. Even Euro 2004 I thought, never mind, we're not going to be France, win European Championship and World Cup at the same time. I supported Erikkson's choices right up to Saturday, when suddenly I felt let down.

What were Lampard and Gerrard thinking when they took their penalties. I'm pleased we apparently practised penalties (though it's strange that since 1990, which at the time I thought was a fairly bad set of penalties (compared to Germany anyway), we've actually got worse at taking them), though you couldn't have told from Lampard and Gerrard's. It can't be that hard to work out or at least guess why the Germans are so good at them. We can learn that, or we should've.
Isn't it obvious that it's about psychology. When Ballach said a penalty's success is defined during the walk from the centre-circle to the 18 yard box, surely Lampard and Gerrard knew that. They looked terrified, and so did Robinson. What excuse is there for that? As Taylor memorably said: 'Get yourselves up for it!'. Where's a sports psychologist when you need one?

So many other things are to blame: the media, for heightening expectation. It doesn't help to build up false expectations. Italy folded in 1990 under the pressure of the nation's expectations (of course we'd be delighted to be in the semi-finals and lose (which is surely what will happen in 2018 when we get the World Cup in England, losing probably to Germany)); Germany this time by contrast have surely profited from the low expectations of the nation. You probably couldn't change the tub-thumping, little islander, jingoistic bombast of the English press, and hence people, but as long as we can't, I don't think we can ever win the World Cup. As long as commentators are eulogising and exaggerating about the 'Premiership', pundits continue to pontificate about if we could just play a 'high tempo' game, with passion, we'll have these false expectations.

Maybe the solution is to withdraw from the World Cup. When I think about America say, their culture is similar to ours, they're similarly insular and hyperbolic about their culture, and sport. Why don't we retrench behind our own borders, maybe make a rule change or two, and reclaim the game for ourselves. 'Football's coming home'. England are only ever successful when they play games at home, in temperatures that never rise above a certain level. Let's go back to pre-war football: we presume ourselves World Champions, unless any team can come to the New Wembley and prove otherwise.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 243.
  • At 07:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Al wrote:

I carnt believe what I'm reading from some of the comments made. Overhyped? I have always believed confidence is everything and I fully believe our guys were confident. They wanted it and were trully gutted when they didnt get it. As for some people saying that we have a second class team and that our players dont have any skill, do they not watch match of the day every week and see the fantastic skills on show? It annoys me when fans who prior to the tournament said the team could virtually pick itself then post tournament critisise the team selection. Dont get me wrong, I think Sven made some mistakes. Hopefully Stevey Mac will learn from them now he has his chance. But ultimatly can any England Fan say they would not have picked the same team as Sven, except for the odd fringe squad member I dont think so! I think what people need to understand is that we have been spoiled in the past 20 or so years. A world and Euro cup semi final and three major quarter finals. Could be worse we could be Spain who have had some great players over the years but have nearly nothing to show for it. Football is about 75% skill and 25% luck, a ball crosses the line here, a deflection there, refereeing decisions everywhere. It all adds up. The Italian manager raged when it was suggested Italy had been lucky this WC. Stated facts such as pre tournament injuries, red cards etc.. that were certainly not lucky. But ultimatly although they have been lacking in skill so far they HAVE been lucky enough to get through to the semi's. They could get more lucky and Germany misfire on the day and they scrape home with a deflection off a German defender. All of a sudden they are in the final.
I for one, reflect on another good chance, gutted but still hopeful for Euro 2008. SM should start to make players play for their place no matter who they are. If Gerrard, Rooney or anyone is off form , someone else needs to be given a chance be it friendly or qualifier. Fans need to understand this and support the managers decision.
You never no, I could get lucky and see an England Captain lift a trophy in my lifetime.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 244.
  • At 07:01 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • cloggy saint wrote:

After 30 years I'm afraid that was the last time i will watch England, and possibly all international football. I am SICK AND TIRED of a)watching my (strongly fancied) country's players stumble through tournaments and bore the pants off me, b)Grown men collapsing at the slightest nudge and rolling around on the floor clutching their faces. In fact i think my favourite world cup moments involved players taking a dive and seemingly being at death's door, only to leap to their feet and re-join the game when they realise the ref' isn't buying it. Don't they realise how pathetic this makes them look?
So long England, and thanks for the memories, although i can't actually recall too many...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 245.
  • At 07:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Paul wrote:

I agree with post170. Right from when Sven announced the team list you knew he was no svengali.
Enough has been said about the nature of the team he picked, but I'm stunned no one picked the warning signs:
1) Picking unproven players. Rumour has it that his other half picked TW for the teamlist
2) Pinning all hopes on a crock, rather than taking evassive action. I bet the whole Rooney saga didn't do the team much favours - meaning the rest of them were useless without Roo
3) Adopting an unproven formation at the 11th hour.

This stuff is what murder mysteries are made of, and Sven ranks with Agatha Christie and the rest - and still the plot has not been deciphered!

Steve McClaren is no doubt tarnished even before he starts, and I can't see him being any different. Looks very much like a "yes sir" kinda guy, who will be drip-fed by the FA and the press.

The English national team is down in the dumps, and needs to go back to basics if they are to stop being the perennial underachievers of the football world.

A sad demise, and the final nail will be when they fall outside of the top 10 - to be replaced by rising stars from developing world.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 246.
  • At 07:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ajala wrote:

If Sven Goran Ericsson, becomes the new manager of Holland or Spain, do you really think they will struggle passing the ball properly against Ecuador or Trinidad and Tobago ? Of course not. Becos they have the players with the technique to play the ball well under pressure. England hasn't and will never until it admits its sceaming shortcomings. England will never win any major tournament playing the way they do.


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 247.
  • At 07:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

England's failure to perform at the world cup is the fault of Brian Barwick. He failed to take a glorious opportunity to get rid of the Swede in January. Sven has no integity, no passion, no desire and no ability. Look what he did to Roma. Lazio was a chequebook-funded spree. How can anyone, let alone a highly paid experienced coach, get this England squad to be so bad? Sven is useless, but Barwick didn't see it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 248.
  • At 07:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Adam Foster wrote:

The depression has still not yet subsided after a 12 hour drive home...

During the match, I was sitting behind the goal where the penalties were taken, in the upper tier. During the half time interval, a massive (around 20m x 10m) flag was passed over my head and I couldn't read what it said. Did anyone sitting at home / in the stadium see what it said? Whatever it was, the stewards seemed really angry about it

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 249.
  • At 07:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anne Gonnamoe wrote:

Thanks to all the media hype our national teams have been hi-jacked for the feelgood factor! Quite frankly I'm glad it's all over and us "true" supporters can get back to what we do, week-in-week-out, paying to watch our own club.

Last summer it was our cricket team becoming national heroes - but where are all those "fans" now that Sri Lanka have thrashed us? ... where are they when Worcester play Somerset or Yorkshire play Sussex? ... nowhere to be seen!

The people I feel sorry for are those who spent a lot of hard-earned brass going out to Germany to support the team - they have been sadly let down by the most inept manager/coach I have seen in a long time ... how do you expect to win a game playing 4 defenders and 6 midfielders? ... but then what do I know, I've only been watching football for 53 years?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 250.
  • At 07:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • daniel wrote:

england were never a contender for the world cup in the first place! they are so over rated its unbelievable. looking through their squad who is in a class of their own to change the course of the game? no one! to be a world class team u need players like zidane, henry, robinho, kaka, totti, pirlo, ballack, messi and to be honest the list is endless. people need to realise when it comes to the best teams in the world england just aint up there!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 251.
  • At 07:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

so apart from the game itself, if England had somehow scraped through on penalties, the rating for this team would have been completely different. The heroism of playing with 10 men, the stout defending etc.
woul have been played to the hilt.

The story is encapsulated for me by the look of complete indifference on Lampard's face when he missed the penalty (same look on Gerrard's face). No fire in the belly, no fierce pride raging, no anger at oneself for missing. Just a look that says "Oh well, that'll be the end of the world cup then" This "team" is no more than a bunch of overhyped self absorbed individuals with no concept of what it really means to be selected to wear the 3 Lions shirt.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 252.
  • At 07:19 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Tony Whittaker wrote:

Aged 51 I have great experience of our failures, over-expectations and of our 1966 victory.
I am constantly bemused by the social responsibility void displayed by our players.
1. Wayne Rooney should have turned to the player he injured to see if he was OK and to apologise. As he did not can he comment at all on the behaviour of Ronaldo. Should any club bonding have protected Wayne from the red card? - it was a bad foul, metres from the ref and deserved a red card. (Actually a much worse foul that Marradonna's hand).
2. We have a population of 50.2 millions in England alone. There are 5 brits for every Portuguese. We should use this population index to understand the lack of sports excellence. We cannot be doing enough for the majority and concentrating on the few to fail to find a better English player for every Portuguese player. The statistics say we should have five good players for their one.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 253.
  • At 07:23 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • kevin dunn wrote:

In my opinion the reason we failed at this World Cup was because we do not know how to play international football. The whole philosophy of English players ie work like mad and get behind the ball then quick, direct attacks, just doesn't work. It was interesting to see that they had been working on keeping the ball in training. That's the first time I had heard anyone in the set-up actually identify why we are so average. We are often hard to beat, but we struggle to win. I've watched so many games over the years, not just in major tournaments, but in qualifiers and friendlies, and we just cannot impose ourselves on the opposition. We surrender position too easily, have less of it than so-called inferior sides. Nobody likes our play, nobody will miss us.
Maybe the first signs are there that we need to learn how to play international football. This really is the best group of individuals we've had for years, but just looked like the same old bunch of honest triers. Unless we can somehow harness the individual talent that we have and mould it into something much, much better, then we are going to be disappointed for a long time.

All the cheating makes things worse and leaves a bad taste in the mouth, but shouldn't detract from the fact we are not good enough at international football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 254.
  • At 07:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Could we bring back the 4 nation championship - then at least I can see England win something before I die.

P.S. Why didn't Erikkson sub Robinson for James instead of subbing Lennon for Carragher. At least James has saved a penalty or two, plus he looks a lot bigger.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 255.
  • At 07:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • daniel wrote:

We are not as good as we think we are. End of.
We have no one in the same class as Thierry Henry or Zinedine Zidane. We can't defend aswell as the 'Azzurri'. We haven't got the team spirt of the german side. We can't cheat like the portuguese can. We arent good enough.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 256.
  • At 07:28 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Chopper wrote:

Let's face it, England are in some ways not dissimilar to Brazil (also eliminated) who selected their team based on accomodating star names rather than players who could make a system/formation work. Germany have benefitted from this so far especially when Klinsmann left Ballack out of the opening game thus demonstrating that no one player was greater than the team.

Others mistakes included:-

1: Allowing wife's and girlfriends (WAGS) to be constantly with the players - doubtless some minds were not always on the game...
2: Not enough forwards selected.
3: Continual formation changes.
4: Lack of flexibility tactically.

The trouble is that McClaren is not the answer either, which was evident in Middlesboro's lamentable showing against Seville in the UEFA Cup Final. Furthermore, I don't see a great deal of young talent coming through.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 257.
  • At 07:31 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • t-bone wrote:

well. got to kinda agree with alot of whats been said. we were lucky to get the draw that we did and should have done better. portugal are a good team and i believe that we outplayed them, even without rooney. hargreaves was our best player and i never thought i'd say that. never. beckham shouldn't have played, lennon should (he frightened the life out of everyoe he came up against), walcott should not have gone, neither crouch. ashton and defoe would have given us better options. rooney. oh boy. he stayed on his feet after getting kicked, and i am still open to his 'foul' as simply trying to keep his balance. i have seen replay after replay and not seen once ronaldo ask for a card, or wave his arm around. rooney gave him a push away, ronaldo did not go over, or even look at him accusingly. what really did he do wrong? penalties. we hot all 5 (actually 6) on target - maybe not the best, but on target. damn good goalkeeping (or complete luck) i say.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 258.
  • At 07:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Primordial wrote:

Ronaldo maybe guilting of 'egging' the ref on but Wayne Rooney got himself sent off. He maybe talented but he isn't yet mature enough to represnt England at international level.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 259.
  • At 07:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Steve wrote:


Overpaid and over hyped.. Good individually but don't gel as a team. Reality check time!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 260.
  • At 07:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • markpitchford wrote:

have to say after the portugal game hargreaves has gone up in my estimations.

fitness level was unbelievable and put the others to shame.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 261.
  • At 07:36 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • sapper wrote:

OWEN HARGREAVES, guts and determination and Rio ferdinand's fantastic crunching tackle that got me going. Portugal had nothing, its simple had we played 2 up front and dropped lampard we wouldn't be having this debate but looking forward to wednesday night.

SSSHHHHH beckham slaters

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 262.
  • At 07:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • ravid wrote:

Did we really think Rooney was going to win the world cup for us - how close did he even get to scoring a single goal? Not to be compared with his teammate Ronaldo - I wish we had a player with that much skill and composure.

By the way, the word genius shouldn't really be used for footballers who aren't called Zidane.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 263.
  • At 07:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jon Lee wrote:

Can't you all see it...Sven was taking the micky. Nobody in their right mind would have picked the players he did...but there was method in his madness and that was to make sure England did not win the WC. The FA have also to take their share of the blame for not seeing Sven for what he was...a charletan.

One other point...how is it these young men at the peek of fitness complain of tiredness after an hour strolling around kicking a ball every now and then? The tennis players are on court for 3 to 4 hours sometimes, expending much more energy than a footballer, and where the heat is more stifling. Even 36 year old Agassi can do it because he fights and wants to win.

jon lee, s africa.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 264.
  • At 07:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • r phillips wrote:

Post 248: spot on chris about the Rooney thing... he tried to wait for a place to put his foot for as long as he could, and in the end had to put his leg down or fall over. I agree totally.

Fascinating to watch the blame game kicking into full stride after yet another English football reality check: no bottle. NO BOTTLE. Heard Gerrard say at least I had the bottle to go and take a pen. Well done. Pity you didn't have the bottle to wait til the keeper committed himself before planting the ball in the other side - like Ronaldo did, in fact.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 265.
  • At 07:48 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • now old git wrote:

When I was 19 going on 20 I watched England win the WC. Two marriages, three children, and two grand children later I'm going on 60 and still waiting for a repeat performance, preferably before I die!.
IT AIN'T GOING TO HAPPEN!!!.

English Football: R:I:P.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 266.
  • At 07:53 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • phil wrote:

In fact England went as far as they deserved. On what premise England players thought that they DESERVED to win it, I don't know. Most teams go into the world cup taking each game at a time, and each game should be fought to the death. England went into it, believing that they deserved to be in the final, without first focusing on beating other so called minor teams on the way with some style. Winning is not everything, how you win is just as important. England rely too much on spoiled brats like Wayne Rooney, instead on putting the team first. When the match started I said, Rooney is going to be sent off and England will lose the game. Too right. Better off having many Owen Hargreaves who work hard, rather then 10 Wayne Rooney's that think it is OK to commit offences on the pitch. He doesn't seem to accept that he let England down. Pathetic loser.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 267.
  • At 07:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • jjj wrote:

Here are the points I noticed upon watching the match between England and Portugal:
1. England have arguably the best individual players in the world, however, their ability to gel leaves a lot to be desired.
2. Rooney鈥檚 red card solidified the trend that it pays to fall on the ground and flop around. He could (and probably should) have gone down right away, however he tried to maintain possession and was sent off for it. Good message to young players鈥.
3. Whoever had won this match will be outclassed by France going on current performances.
4. Finally, I have never seen a more pathetic attempt at so called Penalty kicks than England on Saturday. If your opponents miss two completely and you still can鈥檛 win, you should quit professional football. Props to Ricardo鈥 Beautiful penalty goaltending.

I now must pull for my previously hated rival Deutschland for the finals鈥.

P.S. Do me a favour England and get into shape before 2010 so that you don鈥檛 end up barfing in the middle of a match and/or toping out at a walking pace. If you thought Germany was hot鈥ait til South Africa!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 268.
  • At 08:05 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Chris wrote:

I agree that the England football player are overpaid and overhyped. To be fair I think the players themselves are very good and have great potential but put them altogether in the pitch seems to cause their egos (and salaries) to clash! Come on guys why can you not seem to gel together. Its as if they each think they are too good for each other. There was no chemistry in the team. I think ultimately the passion has gone for these ridiculously overpaid individuals. What we need for the next squad is younger, fresher raw talent. Players that will be hungry enough to take up the challenge rather than worrying whether they are better paid than the next player or if their hairstyle is out of place.
P.S. And as for Shearer telling Rooney to stick one in to Ronaldo just goes to show what kind behaviour he is putting across to the public. There is no excuse for violence and encouraging that just enforces the world's view on our bad football hooliganism reputation. At the end of the day Rooney fouled and lost his rag. Is this the type of behavior we should be encouraging the younger generation to have?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 269.
  • At 08:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

At the end on Saturday I felt thoroughly ashamed at the way our players were blubbing like big girls blouses.
The men who played the game with a real football, proper rules, and infinately more ability would never have behaved in such a spoilt child way.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 270.
  • At 08:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • phil wrote:

I find it quite ironic that England fans complain of the foreign diving cheats while Rooney's is sent off for walking on a player intimate parts. What is the worst offence? So much for English fair play. As for rolling around the field Joe Cole is quite a master at it, Peter Crouch scored a goal by pulling a player's dreadlocks out. Do I hear anybody selective memory remembering this great England achievement. The fact that England were very poor, in fact I have never seen such a poor performance from England in the world cup, is certainly the main reason they lost this game. What about starting by being men enought to score a penalty with going home an crying into mummy's lap. The world cup separates the boys from the men. Maybe when the Rooney tantrums stop, England will be a deserving winner.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 271.
  • At 08:12 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Will in Belgium wrote:

I actually didn't even watch the game as I pretty much knew what would happen. Either we'd win 1-0 badly or lose on penalties.

I also can tell you the underlying reason for England's poor performance which can be summed up in the following words:

Rio Ferdinand's World Cup Wind-ups
"Rio Ferdinand plays a series of practical jokes on England teammates including Wayne Rooney, Ashley Cole, Gary Neville and Peter Crouch."

I was astonished to find this programme showing shortly after Englands exit. Clearly it shows what's really important to the team -media exposure, pissing around and getting my wife \ girlfriend on telly.

This is the world cup! The thing about the other teams - especially ones like Germany is that its 100% commitment and focus and attention to detail. Put it this way: I can't see Ferguson, Morinho or Wenger ever allowing such a programme to be made. Gifted amateurs will always get beaten by real professionals. It's not the players fault - they are young and bored in the old days they would have been out drinking anyway. What is SGE and the FA paid for is what I want to know?

By the way - thanks ITV

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 272.
  • At 08:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Les wrote:

The reason England continue not to perform is simple :- theres no competition for places! How many times have we seen a fringe player make the team and be one of the best players...because he is playing for his place. It shouldnt be Gerrard and Lampard it should be Gerrard OR Lampard with a defensive midfielder along side them. Hargreaves is the obvious choice on current form but depending who we are playing we also have Carrick and King when fit.
How many of us knew SGE's 11 for the World Cup after Euro 2004 ??
I agree with your comments about Ashton two good feet good in the air, but also sees things like Sheringham and outjumps Crouch lol.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 273.
  • At 08:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • phil wrote:

Some write that England outplayed Portugal??? Maybe I should remind some that the team that outplays the other wins the game. Portugal played Rooney perfectly and the immature boy was sent off, as expected thus tactically outplaying England. Portugal hammered in 4 penalties, England 2 psychologically outplaying England. Welcome to the real world and see you in 4 years. Growing up is part of the world cup experience.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 274.
  • At 08:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • bryan wrote:

Why on earth are people defending Wayne Rooney?? He is the primary reason England lost to Portugal, not the manager and not David Beckham, not Ronaldo. He would have been arrested for stamping on someone like that in the street. England were the more likely winners until that stupid act, after which 10 men ran their legs off chasing a good portugese team. Credit to the rest of them for keeping going, especially Hargreaves. However good Rooney is, he is a liability to the team and his is single handedly to blame for England's exit. I wouldn't pick him, he's a selfish, spolit bratt that cannot work as part of a team. Look at Italy, they are prepared to leave out their bratts if necessary, Totty was left out earlier and Inzaghi doesnt get a sniff. I cannot understand why so few realise that Rooney's red card is why England lost. Well, I can from the media's point of view, not having stopped praising him as the greatest living person in the build up to his return. Just admit you are wrong and he is cost us the damn game!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 275.
  • At 08:32 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • steve wrote:

LMFAO...typical england fans (and i say that as one myself, altho not of the usual moronic tabloid reading beer swilling variety).

How funny it is to see the fickleness of some "fans"...you create this fantasy land for yourselves by reading tabloid drivel and then are diapointed time after time after time.

Myself...when every world cup comes around, i boycott all tabloids, which means I'm actuallu REALISTIC about englands chances in the world cup...i thought us getting to the quarter finals was about right in the grand scheme of things....we're not better than a top 8 team, and you could argue that we're not even that....so why the big surpise at being knocked out?

EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT!!! SHOCK HORROR - ENGLAND IS'NT AS GOOD AS THE TABLOIDS PUMPED THEM UP TO BE......AND YOU ALL KEEP FALLING FOR IT.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 276.
  • At 08:55 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Doug T wrote:

Brazil Yanker Doug again: I am watching the game for the 4th time now. I am seeing an attacking England in the second half that is taking it to Port. Rooney and Cole whiffing on a Lennon run etc. To me it looked like the guys were coming out to take it to them. It also seems to me that Rooney was simply fighting for the ball and position while being pulled from behind. The ref at first just stood with his had pointing for a free kick, only after Rooney pushed Ronaldo did he get animated and go for the card. So quite possilbly it would have been NOTHING had Rooney not lost his cool. 10 men totally changed the game obviously. I had been raving earlier on in the tourney about how so many of these players must have IQ's of knats, in that on the world stage, representing their countries they do stupid things forcing their teams to play a man or two down.

I think this is an indication of a problem in many professional sports globally. The days of the lads fighting for God and Country are long gone. It is about the money and individual fame and it is ever harder to get a group of talented players to pull as a team in any high profile sport. The World cup comes along and it is more of the same. A ton of Prima Donnas and few really compelling games full of team chemistry and drive. Brazil at the lead this time around. The hungry players were on the bench for the most part. Lennon just missed a put away after the free kick in the 37th minute. With some luck it goes in....

A lot of class players have looked horrific in front of the goal this year. Henry, come on... offsides almost 20 times almost costing France
it chances... The Brazilian goalkeeper Dida freezing up letting Henry shoot
point blank without taking a step to punch the ball easily away! How do you explain it all, a degree has to be simply the luck of the draw. Add in confidence and character and leadership qualities (Zidane) and you
have a shot at greatness. Lennon's shot bounces in, Eng beats Port with
10 men and then who knows what can happen! Another Great chance at 46 minutes in the second half.... folks
it could have been you by a thread.
The lads were almost dead at 90 minutes.....then another 30 a man down. Come on, give them credit. AND,
figure out this issue with penalty kicks. A professional player should be able to knock it in in his sleep!!!
Sorry!!! Even when half dead as they were.

The reffing challenges, the cheating
to win at any cost, these things have to be handled or really, who gives a damn in the end if the loosers and whiners are the winners? Watch Rugby
instead or American Football where there is some real hitting going on..

Anyone who has played team sports will tell you that a coach that can inspire and lead men can make the difference. You need to start there. Don't let them settle for second best in the drivers seat! Zico is free I think!

8 minutes into extra time, a foot away
from a Crouch header from Gerrard....
A thread folks, stand by your guys.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 277.
  • At 09:00 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Michael O wrote:

Until we start picking the team based on merit we will NEVER win any magor football event EVER. Every country's highest goal scorer was at the world cup apart from England's (Bent). Owen didnt play all season and was picked ahead of Bent. Chouch only scored 8 goals and was picked ahead of Bent. Theo has never played in the league and was picked ahead of Bent.
Please wake up people. The French team is picked on merit regardless of race or colour....i say no more.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 278.
  • At 09:01 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Julicarlos wrote:

l think england got as far as possible. the players are over hypes, the press makes a buzz around them as if they're are the greatest players that have ever walked the planet. where was the lampard and gerrards when we needed them? oh i forgot, we're not playing sunderland or bolton or even trinidad and tobaggo. and whoever said Ricardo Carvahllo over reacted? just let someone trod on your groin with a pair of football boots and then come back and tell me he over reacted. rooney lost it, simple. genius but flawed. and as for sven, if l was the onli left in this country l'd have shot him a long time ago when he managed to pick a toddler who'd barely kicked a ball all season a head of defoe and darren bent. even james beattie was having fun this season. and you pick a 2 yr old onli to sit him on the bench. good thing he didn't play him. all it would've take was one crunching tackle and he be running to his mum. and who Big Mac is any better than sven? he's just as confused as his master.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 279.
  • At 09:04 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • michael way wrote:

Until we start picking the team based on merit we will NEVER win any magor football event EVER. Every country's highest goal scorer was at the world cup apart from England's (Bent). Owen didnt play all season and was picked ahead of Bent. Chouch only scored 8 goals and was picked ahead of Bent. Theo has never played in the league and was picked ahead of Bent.
Please wake up people. The French team is picked on merit regardless of race or colour....i say no more.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 280.
  • At 09:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Peter Johnson wrote:

England wake up! You are not as good as you think. Wayne Ronney may have thought that he was playing American Football, but in soccer, that is a blatant offense that is punishable with a card. That the ref gave him red is deserving. Better luck next time. The English team need to play better soccer to win matches. Hype and huff do not win matches.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 281.
  • At 09:17 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ian wrote:

England players can't be faulted - the problems lie in selection and above all tactics!!!
A completely average set of players moulded into a well balanced team like Greece and Germany can win these tournaments - England had top skilled motivated professionals, international experience, youth and pace available for each position - but Sven didn't pick the right ones to suit the system, picked the wrong system for the players he chose and showed too much loyalty to players who showed they couldn't fit the system.
Long balls over the top to a lonely Crouch or squeezed through the middle to a man-marked Rooney - awful, stupid and predictable. Any pub team manager could have got more out of England's players! "Right, Joe, you run round the back, wait for lanky to get up there and cross it in. Aaron - go pull the other full back away from the far post to let Stevie have a run in.... Football's a simple game, Sven's an intellectual - bad combination!!!!! The FA should demand a refund.
There were selection comedies - why leave out the top English striker in the league, or a winger who practically beat the USA single handed scoring 2 on his England debut - what more does a player have to do to get Sven's approval? No, I don't blame the media, the hype, the players or the fan's wishful thinking - it was bad coaching, plain and simple!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 282.
  • At 09:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Andy wrote:

Lets face it, England didn't just lose to Portugal they had a dire tournament. At no point did they look capable of beating one of the top sides.

Fingers will be pointed at Wayne Rooney. Yes, he made a mistake and his aggression got the better of him. Under Alex Ferguson he will learn to harness that aggression in the same way Eric Cantona & Roy Keane did.....and when he does England will have probably the best player in the world. Once again the English media put far too much pressure on one player. Make no mistake Wayne Rooney is THAT good....when fit!

To me, you have to lay the blame fairly and squarely on the doorstep of Sven & Steve McClaren. They didn't take the right people, clearly don't know how to motivate the team, and worst of all showed gaping holes in their tactical know-how! Why take Theo Walcott if you don't have the faith to play him? Owen Hargreaves...improved this tournament but still not international class! Michael Carrick, easily the best player on the pitch again Ecuador but on the bench for the next game? One up front??? The list could go on!

Whats worse...will it get any better? Steve McClaren was part of a set-up that didn't work..what will he change? England do have players with enough talent to win a World Cup but they need a manager and a captain that can motivate them and make them play as a team!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 283.
  • At 09:27 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Nicky Emsley wrote:

Well, England didn't live up to all the hopes of may around Britain but myslef as I am Scottish and have been a Portugal fan and follower I am quite glad to see them go out to my team. Wayne Rooney played a main part in the match losing his controll again, a thing Sir Alex may want to take note of.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 284.
  • At 09:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Pierce wrote:

Well, it's just unfortunate that the other 281 people who had posted messages so far didn't share Steve's phenomenal telepathy skills.

Like supercilious Steve(post 282), I too would classify myself as an England fan who is 'not of the usual moronic tabloid reading beer swilling variety'(although Steve's spelling of 'altho' and rather fashionable 'LMFAO' would contradict his assertion) But I was still gutted when England were knocked out by Ronaldo and his merry bunch of cheating fairies.

To be a true fan, is to hope when all hope is lost. For example, head in hands, 92nd minute of the match, I was still watching Barcelona pip Arsenal to the Champions League trophy, in the vain hope that Henry may pick up the ball and score a 40 yard screamer, the likes of which football had not seen before. Obviously, this never happened. The same can be said of the Sunderland fans this year. Their team was pitiful, but their support was comparable to any supporters in the world, even when they were relegated and without any hope, they still turned out in numbers to cheer on their team.

As the England players set off for Germany, most of England was hoping that they would return with the World Cup, not expecting. It is not 'the tabloids', Steve, that create the national hysteria, its hope. It is patriotism, it's the national unity, it is the love of the game but most importantly it is hope. And that is what it is to be a supporter. I did not think England would win the World Cup, I believed and hoped that they could, but realistically I did not expect them to. But 120 minutes gone and into penalties the game went, if Steve can tell me he was kicking back in his armchair( I鈥檓 presuming with a broadsheet spread over the arm rest) saying 'oh don't worry guys, England aren't that good anyway. Infact let's be honest, they deserve to go out now', then I would tell him that he is no England fan, of any variety, but merely a pessimist of magnificent proportions. It is natural to be disappointed, the streets lined with grown weeping men and women outside my local pub were testament to that fact, it is a shame Steve that you were unable to join a uniformly disappointed nation on Saturday evening.

I look forward to the future. Sven may not have conquered the world but we have moved forward, not as far as we would have hoped, but forward we have progressed. 2 years seems like a long time to wait now, but in 2008 we shall start the cycle again, new boss, new captain and perhaps if those like Steve can stand the humiliation of sinking to our level, a few new fans as well.

40 years of hope is a long time, is another 2 years too much to ask for?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 285.
  • At 09:30 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • richard wrote:

2 of the 4 teams got through to the semi finals on penalties, 3 if you count Italy's late penalty against Australia in the 2nd round. Until England master the skill of penalty taking they will never win the world cup.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 286.
  • At 09:30 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • confiseur wrote:

England lost because their players and manager where simply not good enough...over hyped and vastly over rated...if it looks like a dog and sounds like a dog then it probably is a dog...and England looked frankly awfull...our best player by far was a German trained Canadian etc... ad infinitum...
This coming season in the Premier League there will be plenty of games between major clubs with no English players as pioneered by Arsenal...no doubt some clowns will say this is great for 'English'football. Sorry for the ranting style but if anyone thinks things are going to change for the better under Sven MacClaren they are seriously misguided.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 287.
  • At 09:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • DLR wrote:

This England team was expected to go to germany and come back with the world cup having strolled through the competition - If you listened to the press hype on the build up. With the players at their disposal they should have been capable of taking on any team in the world. They failed miserably. In the end they got what they deserved out of the competition. Having read the press, since the Portugal game, most seem to put the blame on Ronaldo. It would appear it was his fault that Rooney was sent off, thus costing England the game. Rooney got himself sent off by losing his cool again and kicking out at another player in front of the referee. Ronaldo rightly complained to the ref about the tackle. This combined with an inabilty to score from the penalty spot cost England the Portugal game - nothing else. By the way did anyone see that Theo Walcott chap who went to germany for a holiday ?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 288.
  • At 09:35 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • strozzapreti wrote:

I'm no England fan (FORZA ITALIA!), and thought both their players and coach equally responsible displaying no plan nor, even more shamefully, heart during the tournament.

However, I would like to praise their FANS in the stadium for superb support. Who sings louder, more often and with more passion? No one! The Korean fans were great as well, but too organised for my taste. The Dutch are also great at making noise (and using orange to great visual effect).

But no one beats the English for sheer willingness to support their team. It's a shame they were given no reward. "Lions watching donkeys" indeed...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 289.
  • At 09:51 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Carole Calisgil wrote:

Hey, let's all kick them while they're down shall we! If you want to complain about the team as players, we should look at ourselves as SUPPORTERS. Sure, like thousands of others, I was very disappointed that England didn't progress further,but to be a supporter means to support in bad times as well as good. (And maybe we're wondering when we're going to be rewarded by the good times! - Let's have faith). I think they're all overpaid for doing the job of work they do, but then I guess most other teams are also overpaid and this point doesn't really signify. Rooney didn't do himself any favours in the eyes of others, but the poor chap hardly got a chance to put his foot near the ball, before being attacked from all sides, and this didn't just happen in the Portugal game. It would take a saint to continually accept this without responding in some way with frustration. Beckham has done a lot as an ambassador for England and for football. The media built him up into an icon over the years, and Oh! how we love to hero worship! When disappointment sets-in at the realisation that the icon is just a regular guy after all who, at the age of 31, isn't playing as well as he did 5/6 years ago, (what a surprise!) how we love to tear that icon down. (The money he may have earned, has nothing to do with this arguement, it's simply a by-product of the icon-building). I thought that the 10 men played with true grit and I was proud of them; it's right that Owen Hargreaves should get special mention, because he certainly went that extra mile. I'm looking forward to the next International match, so that I can once again support our English team!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 290.
  • At 09:59 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Martin wrote:

A couple of corrections to other posts: we didn't get 5 (or 6) pens on target - only 4. The final one was not required. (Although another way of looking at it is that we missed 3 and they missed 2 - so pretty close, really!)
And, it will not be hot in South Africa in 2010. The tournament will be played in their winter, so conditions will be similar to the 1995 Rugby World Cup - fairly temperate. Clutching at straws, I know....!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 291.
  • At 10:07 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • David wrote:

Have to agree with most that's been said. We are at best a mediocre team with ambitions far above our talent. The sooner the press and the majority of the blinkered fans realise, the better. The rest of Europe cottoned on years ago!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 292.
  • At 10:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • snrd wrote:

I love England but you've got to love football more. If England played poorly in every game and had still managed to win it would have been a travesty (although I would never have admitted it).
I mean playing one upfront against an already weakened Portugal doesn't exactly smack of ambition. This time we really did have both the talent and the guts...which means you have to elsewhere for an explanation.
I think Sven has done a great job over the last five years and I even thought that everything might just come together this time. No matter what the team says about him I think Sven did them a great dis-service with his cagey 4-1-4-1 formation. We know we are crap at penalties, so surely we should have aggresively gone for the win!? (Certainly the whole Rooney thing wouldn't have happened then too).
Anyway I'm proud of the team full stop. We went out but so did Argentina and Brazil, so we're in pretty good company. If anything should change for the future it should be our mentality as fans, journalists, players, managers and administrators: Play the game, play it well, play it fairly, play it with skill, flair and courage.
If England did that everytime they played I suspect we'd qualify for most tournaments and then be in a better position to win them.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 293.
  • At 10:13 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • PW wrote:

OK, so we didn't get thro to the last 4. Does anyone out there seriously think we're on of the best four teams in the world? Enough said.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 294.
  • At 10:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • SuperChiz wrote:

Another World cup, another quarter final defeat, another knockout via penalties and overall another big disapointment. The only thing one can say is that it had been coming. England have passed another opportunity to declare to the world they are a football nation to be reckoned with. Instead all they have shown is that English football is poor, boring, technically inept and relies too much on fortunate long balls and one or two key players to make all the difference. A valiant effort was given after the sending off of the frustrated, high temper Rooney. However this was one of best chances to win the world cup. With Argentina and Brazil out the way, only a tired French side and an Gun-ho Germany (or possibly a lame Italy) we stood a fair chance. Overall in this tournement all of England's victories have come with a reasonable degree of fortune, with the first match being the most illustrative of this with the own goal. In not one match was there any sign of England improving on dysmal, desperate displays and we all knew that if they didn't it was game over.
England generally were appalling considering their potential and the influential players in the squad. No shape, no attacking, no conviction it was a case of "lets try get a goal if we can, then defend if we can". You can point the blame at one thing but in retrospect it was many things. YES Svens tactics and squad selection were confusing and inadequate. YES our highly paid key players didnt perform when we needed them to. YES our formation and player positions were very questionable and ineffective. To have a realistic chance to win the world cup the team must play at its best, have lots of belief and have lots of luck. England had none of these. However considering Englands overall performance in the world cup, they finished in a very flattering position.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 295.
  • At 10:15 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Dave Leggett wrote:

Let's just catch a grip folks. Yes, it is very disappointing to lose in this manner. But we do have the players. The problems were in the system that they were stifled by and the star players Sven was incapable of sacrificing for the benefit of the team (chiefly Beckham and Lampard - Carrick and Hargreaves aren't 'stars' but did what was asked when needed). Sven took a gamble with the squad and we knew that when Owen hobbled off against Sweden, that gamble had spectacularly backfired. Sad. Devastating even in the way things unfolded in the end (brave performance by 10 men and we went out on the lottery that is penalties).

But if the right team is picked to a system they are familiar with (in this case, 4-4-2), even an average team can progress in a tournament that always has a fair bit of luck about it. Look at Germany. Let's at least hope that a few basic lessons have been learnt ahead of the next Euros. And one thing I respect Sven for: yes, don't blame Rooney. I don't think the average fan will lay the blame at his door.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 296.
  • At 10:16 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Zico7 wrote:

The England team lacked the imagination,belief and desire of its supporters.Literally hundreds of thousands of fans saved up,came up with crap excuses to get off work and endured crappy performance after performance in the slight hope that England will reap glory.But not to be...because the Team just couldnt inject that extra bit of effort.The fault lies with Sven but also the England Team.Surely at that level players are able to change things on the pitch when its not going there way without having to rely on a doughnut of a manager! I honestly cannot believe I bought into the idea that England might just win it - even after performances against Worlds Minnows (no disrespect!)
Good luck Mclaren...your days are already numbered!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 297.
  • At 10:24 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Leonard wrote:

Well, I think England has the best players in the World... no doubt about it. But, there is one thing missing: to be the World Champion you need also to be mentally strong. The Portuguese team has great players as well, maybe not as many as England, but they are mentally connected to win every game at any cost. Ronaldo can't be the excuse! He was playing on the other side, so he was asking for a fair decision by the ref. I don't blame him... It was a shame to see Rooney doing that to Carvalho. He was so stupid that he didn't realised that the ref was just next to him... poor "golden boy".
Well... now I wish Portugal to win the cup. It's the only way I can think that it could be ours.
Go Portugal!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 298.
  • At 10:26 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • AS wrote:

Teams that get to the finals, nay even the semis have playmakers. They have their Zidanes, Decos, Pirlos and Ballacks.

England has no one of the sort, and hasn't ever in the past. Gazza might have been if he wasn't such a petulant disturbed individual (i'm trying to be nice).

What I can't figure out is whether this is because no one of the right skills has shown up, or if this kind of player is not appreciated and is discarded by English football.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 299.
  • At 10:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • jack isle of wight wrote:

England will never ever win on penaltys /beckams past it /but a lot of good players like jt and gerrard will be around for the next world cup.Personally id like to see a manager with some passion,unfortunatley i can see it being the same old dissapointment with mclaren in charge.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 300.
  • At 10:40 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • KS wrote:

I think, overall, the England team played very well.
What people dont seem to realise is that all the teams at the world cup are good.
Take any 11 professional footballers and get everyone behind the ball, just defend and any group of superstar players would find it hard to break them down. Add to the mix that this is the match of their lives in 30deg heat and you've got trouble.
This isnt the 1960's where half the opposition teams comprised of naive amateurs!
England did very well to negotiate the group stages with such aplomb.
The players gave their all in every match and i dont think we could ask for more than that!
As for penalties, the pressure the England players clearly felt, is an indication of their desire to win. The irony is if all they cared about is money they would have found them much easier!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 301.
  • At 10:41 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Vix wrote:

Seriously, who are all of you to pass judgement on these footballers? I bet most of you sit around all day, drinking beer, doing nothing useful whatsoever. Yet, as soon as England don't live up to your expectations, its a wave of vidictiveness and bitterness. Football is a fantastic game, we have fantastic players who are passionate and dedicated to what they do and yet the World Cup brings out the worst in everyone: the inevitable (and frankly so boring) anti-english sentiment of the Scots, to name just one. Its a game, we lost and we are all gutted - but stop with the blame.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 302.
  • At 10:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • James from Manchester wrote:

I think that a does of reality has really set in and I too don't think we should blame our over-hyped, over-paid tired players or Mr Erickson for getting paid 拢25 Million.

If you really want to blame the real culpits then I think you should look no further than the FA as there are plenty of good Englishman who would do the England coaching for a relatively small retainer, as Alf Ramsay did and it is the unmentionables at the FA who create these problems with their repeatedly bad choice of managers.

The teams that are going home like Argentina and Brazil have all had large build ups that pressurises the players and have managers that continually meddle and e.g. play Ronaldhino and Riquelme out of position and can't make up their minds... just like Erickson.

If you really want to win the World cup then listen carefully to what Geoff Hurst, Booby Charlto and Alan ball have said. You need players that will run their legs off for their country and without money grabbing on large money spinning adverts and/or who have egos to match their bank balances.

Good riddance Erickson, Beckam and the rest of the hyped up money grabbing ego merchants. Good riddance Rooney if you can't control your temper at least once very four years!

A good manager should only need to pick the team and let the players do the rest - Do you think Alf ramsey had to tell Nobby Stiles who to mark and how to stay in position or to think whether Messrs Peters, Hurst or Charlton was likely to score from the penalty spot. The England team have become a joke under Erickson - Good riddance!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 303.
  • At 10:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Steve Davis wrote:

hindsights, foresights, all i saw was people trying to do there best genuine, i feel they are there for a reason and they are better than me or anyone who writes in this blog including terry butcher even in his hey day,and you can all be like the press if you wish too be thing is its there destiny not yours fair enough you support them and pay to see them but whos the people who make footballers into stars YOU face facts we put em up there then we tear em down the pressure on those people is immense get a life get real and thank the england players for getting as far as they did and dont be like all those cheating players those confused referees and chin up believe in the songs we sing and go on believing cos thats all we have inside you know the players we have are good at what they do mistakes were made forgive and move on, i for one know that if football did not have all the ifs and mabyes then i wouldnt enjoy it so much ,we were not the best team out there and we gave it a go some players will admit they did not play to there best and hopefully a true manager can stand up and say ok i made mistakes but sven was never that but he was not evil either there are no rights or wrongs just do,s.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 304.
  • At 10:52 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Thomas wrote:

Did anybody here consider why Scolari didn麓t want to take over Sven麓s job ?

Well - he麓s a smart man. After seeing 20 English reporters camping outside of his house for a week he decided not to be pestered 7/24 by the English media.
And I think the reporting of the Sun on Sven and his private life ( as well as the private lifes of several players ) hasn麓t gone lost on him either.

What the heck is so important in who he麓s sleeping with ?

As long as "The Sun" and the rest of this bunch keep hyping and lynching - and of course the crowds lap it up - you will see the self-deception happen over and over again.

I麓m German and not actually a friend of fish & chips - but I think any fish with just a trace of pride left should jump off "The Sun" - after deep frying.

The media terror doesn麓t completely justify Sven麓s performance, but I believe that anybody who麓s under so much pressure is more likely to make mistakes and lose the confidence to e.g. actually drop Beckham.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 305.
  • At 10:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • w. hadrian wrote:

Skill and intelligence is the name of the game.
SKILL AND INTELLIGENCE, do you hear?
Unfortunately England have too little of this.
And....
to say that Lampard and Gerrard are world class is a joke. Quite a funny one actually. hahah. hahahahha. hahahahahhaha. hahahahhahahahahahahh.
Let me tell you what a world class midfielder looks like.
A bit like Zidane; a bit like Requelme.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 306.
  • At 11:05 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Geoff Rowbottom wrote:

If England really want no more false dawns everyone needs to actually look beyond Sven.

I think England's performances are hampered by the club vs country problem. IF we want a team that actually gels and is more than a collection of individual stars, the England team must play more games and have the power to pull the players away from clubs to play meaningful friendlies. And maybe at the end of friendlies, penalty shoot-outs are adopted if the game ends in a draw.

Also Sven got England to three quarter finals in a row. Not exactly silverware, but lets not forget we didnt even qualify for the World Cup in 2004 and we were in trouble for qualifying for the following tournament until Sven took up the reins.

Sven has been too cautious but the problem is turning a collection of stars into a team. The team has to be bigger than the individuals and needs practice time together.

England friendly matches are seen too often to be a distraction from club football. The result showed itself in the 2006 World Cup - an England team that had played fewer prep games than most other team... and a team that couldn't keep posession or play with true confidence.

OK Sven should have taken Owen or Rooney plus four other strikers - but Sven alone is not the issue. Four quarter finals on the trot is an improvement on the previous 8 years. Until we put country above club, England will achieve little more.


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 307.
  • At 11:06 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Geoff Rowbottom wrote:

If England really want no more false dawns everyone needs to actually look beyond Sven.

I think England's performances are hampered by the club vs country problem. IF we want a team that actually gels and is more than a collection of individual stars, the England team must play more games and have the power to pull the players away from clubs to play meaningful friendlies. And maybe at the end of friendlies, penalty shoot-outs are adopted if the game ends in a draw.

Also Sven got England to three quarter finals in a row. Not exactly silverware, but lets not forget we didnt even qualify for the World Cup in 2004 and we were in trouble for qualifying for the following tournament until Sven took up the reins.

Sven has been too cautious but the problem is turning a collection of stars into a team. The team has to be bigger than the individuals and needs practice time together.

England friendly matches are seen too often to be a distraction from club football. The result showed itself in the 2006 World Cup - an England team that had played fewer prep games than most other team... and a team that couldn't keep posession or play with true confidence.

OK Sven should have taken Owen or Rooney plus four other strikers - but Sven alone is not the issue. Four quarter finals on the trot is an improvement on the previous 8 years. Until we put country above club, England will achieve little more.


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 308.
  • At 11:08 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Ed More wrote:

Cheer up everyone!!
Rugby World Cup next year.
England are bound to beat the Wallabies/All Blacks/France.and be World Champions again.

Oh well I did try!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 309.
  • At 11:11 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Phil wrote:

Well what can you say. I feel like everyone else. England were hyped up from the very start. One could tell from the first game they played in the World cup that it was going to be a big disapointment.
I live in Canada and like most ex-pats was glued to the TV in the pub. I think the general feeling here was it wasn't a surprise. I think we were lucky to get as far as we did. We never really played a team of any great calibre so that was worrying to start with.
It was just a question of time. No way would we have come near beating Germany, France or Italy we just didn't have it together.
Sven must take the blame his stratedgy throughout the competition baffled me and it was painful to watch.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 310.
  • At 11:12 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Bill K wrote:

Whether consciously or subconsciously, the players of England had no confidence in Beck's ability. That is why so little of the play during the match went to Becks' side. That is why England was so easy to stop...... a one-sided attack. For 10 minutes after Becks went out, we saw a wide-open english offense, with Lennon and Cole rushing in at either side; Gerrard taking the set pieces very well and Rooney having chances to create.......... for 10 minutes. If you watch the tape during that period, they'd cut to the English fans and the looks on their faces was one of glee. It was only a matter of time... It was only a question of how.... Then Rooney lost his mind. I don't care what he says now. He acted stupidly. Sven's gone. Becks' gone. Otherwise the team is in tact. This is addition by subtraction.

For 10 minutes, England found it's form during the WC. The side had quality but not form previously. Next tournement they will have both.

This isn't rocket science as Sven would have you believe. Stop catering to the big names and make everyone earn a spot on merrit ( done rambling).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 311.
  • At 11:19 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Damian Scannell wrote:

I have just taken a look at the Germany 1 England 5 recap from 2001, the following points may have some relevance. Neville, A Cole, Ferdinand, Campbell, Gerrard, Beckham, Owen all played, Hargreaves and Carragher were on the bench. Nine of the original 2006 WC party, additions were J Cole, Rooney, Terry and Lampard, Robinson for Seaman in goal, hardly weaknesses. The manager was the same Swedish chap. So in 2006 the players were 70% the same, bolstered by some great young talent, the manager was the same, they were playing a vital and meaningful International and they won convincingly against a decent German side. The difference was we played 4-4-2, kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 312.
  • At 11:20 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • sherif wrote:

another failed attempt by England. Its no surprise. I will be here in 4 yrs time and will report another failed attempt by England under the scorching sun of south africa. I am 34 yrs old now, might make it till 64 and still won't see any english captain holding the trophy

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 313.
  • At 11:22 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Mario wrote:

Seeing and listening to England fans' reaction to the Portugal game is typical of fans starving for some success. To say that England had the talent is laughable. To blame the referee is even more laughable. It is about time the FA look in the mirror and see that it's "world class" players, are not all that world class. They may be good in England, but once they venture into the International scene, they struggle with other nations' creativity and better tactics. England just can't compete and this was supposed to be the best England team in 30 years???!!!!

This sums it up. England's best player in the biggest game of their lives was a player (Hargreaves) that was born in Canada, and learned to play football in Germany!!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 314.
  • At 11:27 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jay wrote:

I agree with the blogger and one or two comments. Basically, the only sympathy Rooney gets from me is that he should have won a few free kicks atleast, prior to the stamping. But Calvalho did wrap his legs around Rooney. This leads me to think Rooney's short temper played a big part in it, and how well popular his temper is. If he had learned to deal with it when he joined us (Man Utd) then Portugal wouldn't have attempted to wind him up.

Now another thing i want to say regarding Ronaldo, i hope us arrogant English fans and media realise, in Ronaldo's position [regardless of whom the culprit plays for], we would have done the same. Rooney and Ronaldo have reported to have solved there situation. Now it is time for us to forget about the actions of Portugal and move forward. Failure to do so will cause future problems in Euro 08 and the next WC. But as for Eriksson, I'm glad he's gone. Overall Rooney, should be feeling unlucky and also maybe blaming himself to a certain extent at the same time. Maybe next time less hype about the England team??

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 315.
  • At 11:29 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • hkworldcup wrote:

England failed to prepare for this tournament properly, no plan B, did not find out how their opponents played, not enough strikers, penalties? see how the Germans prepared. Will the English press too do their job? it is so easy, and lazy, to hype up a team, but not to understand that two teams turn up at a game.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 316.
  • At 11:34 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

The most annoying thing is that there is so much talent in our squad, but the formation was crap!!! And why not 4-4-2??? Why was rooney sent off for making a false step! Lennon was awesome, but we failed to link up correctly, it was frustating seeing half chances and individual skill without England taking control and penetrating the defense! and with the skill in our squad why didn't beat the portuguese! When Mclaren becomes manager i hope he changes things, and we better win Euro 2008.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 317.
  • At 11:36 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • MYSBAH wrote:

In my opinion, England doesn't deserve to be in the quarter final itself. They were pathetic all the way. I have never supported England and never will. As an Arsenal ardent supporter, July the 1-st had been my day. Henry scoring the best goal and geting his revenge over Ronaldihno. Two Man Utd players, Rooney and Ronald, fighting each other and Rooney getting red card. What a day it was!!!!!!. A day of victory for real football fans not hooligans.

I am such supporter of France except for Henry but they now become my favorite. But Portugal I normal support and they did me a favour by eliminating the good-for-nothing English. So, the choice seems to hard yet. Who cares, once the England is eliminated I don't mind even if the Gerry wins.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 318.
  • At 11:42 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Anthony wrote:

i completely agree with post 323. Ronaldo should not all be blamed. He did what players do week in week out - try to get a free kick. What winds me up more is how unfair the bbc is. Owen hargreaves played the best game of his life in an english shirt. however from the viewers votes ronaldo was supposed to have man of the match then how was it given to owen.

Another reason for other countries playing better than england is that most of their top players play in our league. each foreign player playing in our league elimainates a position for an english player. theres not one team that played a full 11 enlish in the premireship this season.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 319.
  • At 11:47 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • bigmac wrote:

As a Jock, I suspect my opinions won't be too welcome, but England DO have players capable of winning the world cup (or at least did for this one).

I think all the issues lie with Sven. He made some bad decisions in choosing his squad, most notably only taking four strikers, especially when he used one of those slots for Walcott.

Then having got there, he failed to react to the fact that Beckham and Lampard were not playing well, and didn't have the nerve to drop either.

Finally his game plan seemed to be that he was playing not to lose, rather than playing to win; against weaker opponents, and during the group stage this wasn't punished but in the knock out stages he needed to be more aggressive.

4-5-1 with a partially off form midfield was suicidal

Had he played 4-4-2 with Cole, Hargreaves, Gerrard and Lennon in midfield, and Rooney up front with Crouch, I think right now England would be preparing for a semi with France.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 320.
  • At 11:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Francisco wrote:

So far I've read the comments and I agree the most of them. Well blaming Ronaldo as public enemy number 1 is just as bad as saying he did that foul. I don't even know if Rooney deserved a red card but at least it was foul. Then blaming Ronaldo for the result or for being eliminated is just an excuse of someone who still have to learn how to loose a match. The blame is in the squad as well in the manager. Everybody is to blame. When they win everybody wins and when they loose everybody loose. Some of the players went to German for tourism reasons I believe. Football was not a thing for the english players and I believe in the future things will change. Most of the players on the current squad can win a major competition. Just drop some like Beckham.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 321.
  • At 11:49 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Robbie Skipper wrote:

Wait a second - England never had there best 11 out there.

Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney upfront means our best 11. Who knows what would have happened if both had been fit and started the World Cup upfront?

You are right, it was the best squad England have had in a long long time, with undoubted quality through out the squad, but with a strike force seriously struggling for fitness.

In my honest opinion, if we had a fit rooney and a fit owen up there - we would have gone so much further in this world cup :(

Robbie Skipper 17

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 323.
  • At 11:53 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Finlay wrote:

Think back to France 98,a heroic 10 man England side finally sucumb after a display of petulance from the emerging golden boy of English football and a wet fart of a penalty from a player whose previous penalty taking experience was, well, non existent.

Eileen Drury aside, not much appears to have changed. If anything England have gone backwards. At least we actually made some form of impression in France, that it was entirely down to the youthful brilliance of Micael Owen is irrelevant.

Whatever happened to the swashbuckling style of the three lions? You always used to leave me heartbroken once knocked out of major tournaments for not being the sharpest tactical tools (or penalty takers) in the box.

The answer lies in a rotten Swede devoid of all emotion, unless a bit of skirt was in the equation. Good riddance England, you offered nothing that got me hot under the collar (WAGS aside).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 324.
  • At 11:54 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Steven wrote:

ONE OWEN HARGREAVES, THERE'S ONLY ONE OWEN HARGREAVES!!!

All you London club biassed ignorant fans need to wake up and see that Robinson was no more secure than "Calamity" James, Terry made several lazy errors through the tournament, Lampard looked a little out of shape compared to the ultra fit Hargreaves and as for all this Defoe nonsense....what difference would he have made?? The Spurs bench is a bit cold, maybe he should warm it up again. You all dismissed Hargreaves without giving him the chance. He showed dedication and passion like no other English player and if he isn't a starter for the next matches we're taking a step backwards because as excellent as Gerrard and Lampard are, they don't work AT ALL in the middle. Lets not be so blinded by London teams and London press all the time people!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 325.
  • At 11:55 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jay wrote:

Hey 328, "...is just an excuse of somone who still have to learn how to loose a match", That quote has just summed up English tabloids. You've hit the nail on the head. Now its high time [as a collective] nation we be gracious in defeat. If we had played better throughout the group maybe we would deserve the semi-final place. And yes you blame the team as well as the manager.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 326.
  • At 11:56 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Jay wrote:

Hey 328, "...is just an excuse of somone who still have to learn how to loose a match", That quote has just summed up English tabloids. You've hit the nail on the head. Now its high time [as a collective] nation we be gracious in defeat. If we had played better throughout the group maybe we would deserve the semi-final place. And yes you blame the team as well as the manager.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 327.
  • At 11:58 PM on 03 Jul 2006,
  • Joseph wrote:

People have talked of English over-optimism and over-hyping. Yet England is a nation of proud people. Like a mother with an ugly child, we still love our team anyway. We still believe in it. It even stretches across the world. I'm currently an englishman living in Canada. World Cup coverage here has been surprisingly good. It's also obvious from the Canadian tv pundits and people i meet every day, that Canada wanted us to win and believed in our team too. England always inspires pride, not just in England either. There's a good reason for that. Its who we are. Our sport, our passion and our right to be proud of it. Other nations can see and respect that too.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 328.
  • At 12:00 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Finlay wrote:

Think back to France 98,a heroic 10 man England side finally sucumb after a display of petulance from the emerging golden boy of English football and a wet fart of a penalty from a player whose previous penalty taking experience was, well, non existent.

Eileen Drury aside, not much appears to have changed. If anything England have gone backwards. At least we actually made some form of impression in France, that it was entirely down to the youthful brilliance of Micael Owen is irrelevant.

Whatever happened to the swashbuckling style of the three lions? You always used to leave me heartbroken once knocked out of major tournaments for not being the sharpest tactical tools (or penalty takers) in the box.

The answer lies in a rotten Swede devoid of all emotion, unless a bit of skirt was in the equation. Good riddance England, you offered nothing that got me hot under the collar (WAGS aside).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 329.
  • At 12:01 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Finlay wrote:

Think back to France 98,a heroic 10 man England side finally sucumb after a display of petulance from the emerging golden boy of English football and a wet fart of a penalty from a player whose previous penalty taking experience was, well, non existent.

Eileen Drury aside, not much appears to have changed. If anything England have gone backwards. At least we actually made some form of impression in France, that it was entirely down to the youthful brilliance of Micael Owen is irrelevant.

Whatever happened to the swashbuckling style of the three lions? You always used to leave me heartbroken once knocked out of major tournaments for not being the sharpest tactical tools (or penalty takers) in the box.

The answer lies in a rotten Swede devoid of all emotion, unless a bit of skirt was in the equation. Good riddance England, you offered nothing that got me hot under the collar (WAGS aside).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 330.
  • At 12:04 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • jjj wrote:

Here are the points I noticed upon watching the match between England and Portugal:
1. England have arguably the best individual players in the world, however, their ability to gel leaves a lot to be desired.
2. Rooney鈥檚 red card solidified the trend that it pays to fall on the ground and flop around. He could (and probably should) have gone down right away, however he tried to maintain possession and was sent off for it. Good message to young players鈥.
3. Whoever had won this match will be outclassed by France going on current performances.
4. Finally, I have never seen a more pathetic attempt at so called Penalty kicks than England on Saturday. If your opponents miss two completely and you still can鈥檛 win, you should quit professional football. Props to Ricardo鈥 Beautiful penalty goaltending.

I now must pull for my previously hated rival Deutschland for the finals鈥.

P.S. Do me a favour England and get into shape before 2010 so that you don鈥檛 end up barfing in the middle of a match and/or toping out at a walking pace. If you thought Germany was hot鈥ait til South Africa!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 331.
  • At 12:05 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David wrote:

I would like to say that its one thing to be not good enough, to lose to a better side. There have been many, many incidents in this world cup where teams have gone out because of very bad ref decisions, the italy austraila penality. In our game against portugal... beckham fouled, deliberatly, was the other player booked, no way... The Rooney incident, did the ref actually and see and if he did what did he see, what he saw was a guy doing very good acting and a stuck up spoilt brat about to get his own way. It may have made no difference but at least we would have lost fairly. All the play acting all the "wrong yellows" and "wrong reds" what are fifa doing about it NOTHING cause football isnt a sport anymore its a money making machine. Like why was the roof closed for the match on Saturday, for TELEVISION forget football as long as the pictures are pretty and the adverts are seen.. Money, money money... as for Sven... not enough passion, not a risk taker and for heavens sake why take a player and never use him. Maybe on reflection we lost before we even played a game?!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 332.
  • At 12:05 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • AJ wrote:

Lets look forward... start having lampard and gerrard on the bench if they wud prefer to be in their own teams shirts... and have real english fans who are committed and will want us to win and will make us win! Rooneys frustration shows his passion, same with Beckham! theres only one man in the last game who proved to be england through n through n deserves every praise, he worked solidly throughout and was in every challenge, giving us hope structure and a solid midfield, all praise... OWEN HARGREAVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 333.
  • At 12:12 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • DAVIDEO wrote:

can't they disqualify portugal for cheating and play acting and let us back in! Surely that's not too much to ask is it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 334.
  • At 12:14 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Michael McIver wrote:

I cannot understand many of the comments posted here,why are the armchair experts picking on David Beckham,did'nt they bother to wath the matches,Englands first match was won thanks to a Beckham free kick,he played a large part in the draw with Sweden and he scored the only,winning goal in the third match,what more do these morons want???
As for Erikson,yes he made mistakes but the teams record under his managment was far better than nearly all the useless English managers we have had,I would not put any money on McClaren lasting too long either,what has he done to support his appoinment as England manager.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 335.
  • At 12:21 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • alan wrote:

David beckaham was a good player a few years ago - but never ever a world class one ! A great crosser of the ball and dead ball specialist but that was all he ever was ! His status went through the roof when he married posh - as it was just after Diana died and the press jumped all over the Posh N Becks thing for years - perpetuating the " world class footballer " thing .
If he and Peter Beardsley had each others looks - then Beckham would have been a good player , and Bearsley one of the worlds best !! ( as he was consistently miles ahead of Beckham in every department apart from crossing - but as his looks were debateable , he was never the medias favourite !
A luxury player at the very best .
I was gutted that he scored with a free kick in the tournament which then prompted him to say he's answered the critics -- when he was useless for the rest of the game - who knows how many we'd have won by if Lennon had replaced him ?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 336.
  • At 12:21 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • A wrote:

HOW MUCH do those players get paid!!!

If they have heart like owen hargreaves than maybe they deserve it!

Bring in video replays for refs to see portugese cheaters roll on the floor holding their face... when they've been tapped on the shoulder!

Leave Beckham, like the fans he wanted to win! and won us the place in the quarter final, and caused most goals. Legend!

Fans and only fans deserve to have football come home to england. If you din't have a flag up, ur opinion is not wanted!

Lets rip off john motsons ears and stick em up his behind so he can listen to his sh*t that we have to put up with!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 337.
  • At 12:21 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Patrick wrote:

England are an ordinary team of average (overhyped) players and are just not good enough to win a modern 32 team WC.
Think about it. England have not managed five wins in a major tournament for as far my memory serves me.Four wins in a tournament is good enough for semi-finals only in a 16 team tournament (Italia 1990 and England 1996).

In short, England are only good enough for quarter finals in major championships. The earlier the England fans live with this reality, the better...else more heartaches and heartbreaks are on their way.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 338.
  • At 12:26 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Andy wrote:

Why do some people continue to defend Sven? It's totally right that the players didn't perform, but it's the managers job to drop the players who don't perform. Sven has never done this! Playing a loan striker with 5 midfielders was a joke decision and was clearly done because he didn't have the balls to drop Lampard. McClaren must have had a hand in this non-starter, this worries me.
England need to play a more attacking game and not the ultra defensive, scared game we played in the WC. The team is potentially better than all 4 teams in the WC semi's but they need to be able to do what they are good at.
Unfortunately, super Frank will have to be dropped in favour of either Carrick or Hargreaves to allow Gerrard to play the game he plays at Liverpool. Gerrard, at his best, is worth more to the team than Rooney and he needs to be used correctly.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 339.
  • At 12:31 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ana wrote:

This Cristiano Ronaldo frenzy has really grown out of proportion.

Do people honestly think that an international referee that was selected (or should I say carefully selected) to ref a world cup game would be influenced by a player of the opposing team to give a red card? Do people honestly think that Ronaldo said "give him a red card" and the ref said "oh, ok why not?". Can these people read minds?

I understand that it was painful to see England lose once again to Portugal and in exactly the same way as last time. But to use this as an excuse to feel better about what happened is just silly.

One last thing: one of Englands more tabloid newspapers (not naming names) published a photo of Cristiano Ronaldo as a bullseye, so people could throw darts at it. I feel deeply offended by this as a Portuguese, and even if I was English, I would feel ashamed. Shame on the peorson that thought about this and shame on the person that let it be published. I'm glad to know we'd never stoop this low.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 340.
  • At 12:38 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • ali wrote:

i feel sorry for england but its their fault the way the way they performed during the world cup, i dunno why some people hate ronaldo for , rooney even said that there is "no ill feeling between them both" so why do some of u say that he is public enemy number 1 , some man utd fans say he shouldnt be here(man utd) but when he plays he entertains and then the say he was amazin and after a while they will forgive him so whats da point now sayin they wont forgive him ever . man utd would miss ronaldo if he went.. i am a man utd fan and i think if he left man utd, tehy wouldnt perform da same, i think even chelsea , liverpool .arsenal etc. fans love watchin ronaldo on match of the day , alex ferguson after the world cup finishes he should come out with ronaldo and rooney and have a press conference and each of them should make a statemnet and if they say good things about the incident and if there is " no ill feeling " between them both then they should hand shake and alex ferguson should tell the people 2 forgive ronaldo and show it on all the england newspapers and show the hand shake and say "FORGIVE RONALDO" sir alex says.. and kick fletcher out of man utd coz hes not gd at all and van nistelrooy cause i think hes lost his touch..and bring riquleme and carrick cum on aex u have 2 do it .... and we will b champions next season MAN UTD.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 341.
  • At 12:40 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Sridhar Kolinjavadi wrote:

England football was clearly the bottom of the scale of skill and talent at this world cup. Just about everybody else played better football.

I don't blame Beckham for it, I think he is still one of the few world class players in England.

Most of the rest are clearly overrated and you don't have to look further than Rooney to take the title for that.

I'm glad they are gone.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 342.
  • At 12:50 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • seven wrote:

I think sven does not have the balls to be a national team manager.Believe me i think he laid low for Brazil in 2002 even after Ronaldinho was sent off.He has no charisma and no guts.and he's ugly.Why did he wait on Rooney only to play him as a lone striker? I think deep inside he never believed his team was good enough. Portugal weren't fantastic but their wingbacks always got foward in support but none of that from the English even when they had 11men. God bless Owen H.The rejected stone that became the cornerstone.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 343.
  • At 12:51 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Lostshirt wrote:

England was ill prepared to win at this World Cup... The defense is the only aspect that kept them in the game..

Despite the quality of the players: The Midfield was a disaster

and Goran Ricky can take his 4-5-1 back to Sweden as he leaves

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 344.
  • At 12:59 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Bill K wrote:

Germany sat Kahn.
Italy has sat Totti.
England would never sit Becks.

That has been the key philisophical difference. It's not just about perfmance with England. It's not just about winning.

Strip out all the BS and get back to the basics. You perform, you play. You don't you sit. No matter who you are.

How do you select a striker that you've never seen play?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 345.
  • At 01:12 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Coco wrote:

How can you expect to win a world cup with no strikers! Sven, sven, sven what on earth were you doing.

Everyone on this blog knows what the problems were, Beckham (don't get me started) and no strikers to hold the ball up and allow England out of their own half.

Mclaren is not the answer, Boro nearly got relegated this season.
England need a manager who can create a balanced "team" who play a system they understand let's face it they don't look the brightest bunch. The only way anyone with any class would take the job is if the gutter press in this country stop their rediculous hyping of any player with half an ounce of talent and stop looking for a saviour/scapegoat.

The treatment of C. Ronaldo by the press and the likes of Chris Moyles and Ian Wright this morning on radio 1 was disgusting. morons like Wright and Shearer do not belong on TV. Ian Wright admitted this morning he knew nothing about tactics, why else is he there!

If I were English (which I'm not) I'd get someone in charge who tells it like it is and who is a proven winner, Mclaren is neither.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 346.
  • At 01:32 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • DK wrote:

As much as I like to believe soccer is about luck I also like to see some sort of consistency in a team. From the start, England were fumbling a lot more in comparison to other teams. The lack of confidence showed in their earlier games. Even though they won, it was obvious they had a enormous task ahead of them. They probably wouldn't have even made it to the quarterfinals had they not been in a relatively easy group based on the way they played. I admit that Portugal didn't play their best against England but they were a better team throughout the tournament.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 347.
  • At 01:36 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • John Yeomans wrote:

I have moved to Australia, my son is Australian & I am unsure whether I should pass on the "curse" or "rite of passage" of being an England fan. I too was upset but not surprised by England's latest heart break story, Have had plenty of practice watching in the past. What we all fail to realise that what happens to the England football team, also happens to rugby, cricket, tennis ect... For a nation the size of the UK & the money that supports all these atheletes or players you would expect better results. For years I have bemoaned the lack of a "killer" instinct that is lacking in our sportsmen. We are often the gallant, brave, plucky but generally unlucky loser. The recent Rugby & Ashes success hung by a thread when in reality we should have won much more convincingly. The main driver behind this lack of success is basically we need to get rid of the hype/fame factor that we give our sportsman until they are winners. we should accept a winners only culture & get rid of the "well done old chap better luck next time attitude" Failure should not be accepted, in business this would not be accepted. I personally hate this approach to sport. Thats why I generally dislike Australian teams, German teams & American sports but maybe I dislike them because they are winners. Unfortunately the mental toughness that these teams have is what all our English teams lack. Why else can you explain Germany's penalty success & our abject failure. The future can be bright but we have got to get tough on our failures.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 348.
  • At 01:37 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • hughiemcn wrote:

Re post 5: ROONEY'S BRILLIANCE!!!
Exactly how many goals did the "golden boy" score or create????????

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 349.
  • At 01:40 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • clang wrote:

If the standard of grammar and spelling in these comments is connected to the general standard of intelligence displayed on and off the footy pitch then it's no wonder that England went out.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 350.
  • At 02:15 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Mark Grimes wrote:

When are we as a nation going to move away from our embarassment at actually being good at something...as individuals we shy away from our true potential because we do not want to be seen as showing off - we have such a fear of drawing attention on ourselves, that we sit back and never take any chances...no one with the exception of Rooney, Lennon and Joe Cole has the courage to try and actually take someone on...instead we slow the game down to a snail's pace and move the ball horizontally and then back again...we have to be the most predictable team on the planet. In order to win you must have confidence, you must want to receive the ball and do something with it - almost all of the other competitve countries have this ability - they look comfortable on the ball and are looking to attack with pace at every opportunity...We win the ball and wait for the opposition to re-group. That said - best England players Hargreaves by a mile, Ashley and Joe Cole, Lennon and Crouch (I don't know why he gets stick...he is excellent in the air and has exceptional skill for a man of his size - he would have been able to get his head on a few crosses and knocked the ball back for Rooney who is a much better player when he is facing the goal) we should have played 4-4-2 with Rooney and Crouch up front and Cole and Lennon on the wings..If I can figure this out how come Sven can't. And was I the only one that was in disbelief everytime Joe Cole was substitued - he was one of the only English Players that looked dangerous...I just can't get over the inept coaching combined with the complete lack of confidence and ingenuity of the team...we need some new blood and a manager that will leave the bench and lay into the players when needed - sadly I don't think McClaren is the man for the job

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 351.
  • At 02:28 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ron Saunders wrote:

This is a crap World Cup - hyped up by multinationals, the media, the agents etc etc.

Lineker referring to the World Cup - "It's getting bigger and bigger" so what!! There have been a lot of very ordinary games - players cheating - referees are pretty average but what a thankless task

I used to look forward to World Cups hoping to see a different style of football, of a new move or something out of the ordinary. And what do we get - an ordinary Brazil - too European, Argentina don't select the best talent in the tournament oh, and the same old crap from England - we are not good enough - when will the media wake up to this fact. Don't blame Ronaldo, he's done a professional job on us - simple as that and the new 'World Class' Rooney has only himself to blame.

As for Sven, he is inept but most football people knew that - he has not got a clue - why was Walcott taken? Can anybody provide a rational answer as he clearly had absolutely no intention of playing him.

As for taking Rooney and loading all that hype on a 20 year old was doomed to failure - Football is a team game and to indicate that without one player that our hopes of glory are doomed is beserk

And on Saturday the inevitable sending off occurred, Beckham goes off and cries for himself and then lo and behold they start to play a bit of football - they get on some fit players who get at the opposition and they have a go - pass the ball around get in support and have a bit of a go.

But cast your minds back to previous tournaments -

Spain 1982 Keegan unfit but taken otherwise he would have cried and pouted - Brooking - past it but he's a nice bloke and its our first World Cup for 12 years
Result - Keegan and Brooking play against Spain and are ordinary - Keegan demonstrated the same selfish tendencies as Beckham but with atrocious hairstyles - check out his reaction to getting dropped by Revie in 1975 and also when he was finally ousted by England

Mexico 1986 Bryan Robson - Captain Marvel not fit but must take him despite dodgy shoulder -
Result - breaks down injured and World Cup chances improve

Japan 2002 - Beckham - Clearly not fit but in by popular demand - ineffective and over-hyped

And so to 2006 - Rooney - as per Beckham 2002

And, according to FIFA, Frank Lampard is the second best player in the World!!????
Come to that Ronaldinho was ineffectual but Lampard - please!!!

Count how many times England created or played with fluency, managed to pass the ball without appearing to look awkward and not in full control

They don't appear to be fit enough, they provided little guile, at least eight of the players are uncomfortable with their 'wrong foot' - to be comfortably two footed is surely a pre-requisite at this level but look closely at Ashley Cole and Owen to name but two.

As for the tactics, formations and Sven, then at this level the players should think for themselves - but they do not have the nous to correct things that are not working - the coach should be able to offer insight and motivate and the Captain should be able to take that leadership on to the pitch - oh dear!!! I think we have failed on every count. Formations do not matter if you cannot do the basics under high pressure conditions against top players - basics such as controlling the ball, passing the ball positively (not some non descript passing across the back four)
Other teams pull the oppostion players out of position by crisp passing and movement and then strike - the good teams will do it three or four times and score at least once from these moves.

The long ball is legitimate if it is a well struck, accurate pass - but England use it as a getout ball -struck aimlessly - 'ave it!!

As for technique - the principal reason why we lose shoot outs is that under the most severe examinations we are found out in terms of being able to pass the ball from 12 yards in to the net - when the pressure is on, we crack up - but although it's happened to the likes of Platini and Baggio, collectively we still take crap penalties.

England appear stuck in the dark ages - Lampard and Gerrard 'bombing forward' I hear in the media - with or without the ball??
Hargreaves or Carrick 'holding' - it doesn't matter - Carrick is two footed and clearly the best passer of the ball and should have been the first name on the teamsheet - Hargreaves had a stormer against Portugal - lots of energy - should have played them both. But it does not really matter - if you have eight or nine outfield players who are comfortable on the ball and can play a bit you might have a chance. We do not have that luxury.

But give it to Wayne - he'll stick it in from 25 yards - job done and don't worry about chritmas trees, diamonds, problem left sides

John Terry for Captain - surely you have to be sure of your place!! Classic piece of 成人快手 commentary on MOTD referred to Terry as he brought the ball out of defence in a Cup Tie as a "superb player", "classy England centreback" - "surely he will lead the England defence for years to come" - Forgive me, this is not verbatum but you get the drift - the only problem with this was that I think he was playing against Scarborough!!!

And Rio Ferdinand - referred to constantly as World Class - how many chances did he have to carry the ball from defence into attack - plenty - and how many times did he actually carry the ball - fingers of one hand - but when we started to have a go against Portugal he broke through three players and suddenly there were opportunities - so it can be done - think for yourself

And in today's discussion in the papers on the future captain Gary Neville was referred to as "arguably the finest right back in the game" they're at it again!!!!

This is not unpatriotic - it is because there is total hype around some quite ordinary players - and they begin to belive it themselves.

What win bonus did the team negotiate with the FA prior to the World Cup starting?

A disappointing World Cup so far - quarters were boring except France - for World Class could Beckham, Rooney et al please observe Zidane.

Lower your expectations - we do not have a divine right to win the World Cup - we did it once playing all our matches at Wembley - top eight is our limit - and do not expect changes under McLaren - as another posting stated with the top four clubs managed by non English - what loyalty do they have to supporting our talent.

Oh, and the best English midfielder in the Trinidad game for 70 minutes played for Port Vale.


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 352.
  • At 02:35 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Nigradamus wrote:

You English are so typical. You love to complain about being the misfortunate and then appluad yourselves about how you fought in the face of adversity.

The reason why England will win a world cup once a century is your culture of understatement and manners. Fine when it comes to genteel society, but useless in the throngs of battle. You need to teach future generations that when you are good and talented. USE IT!
You have the best team on paper, but you play not to lose. That is the problem, if you fought so gallantly with 10 men, why didn't you do it with 11? It befuddles me everytime I watch. I am an American (you can rag on our soccer travesty anytime you want, but we are not a soccer nation like you), but I love to see the English play football( in the Premiership)... Why don't you guys play that fast tempo full pressure game like you do in the league. You are not accustomed to that slow skillfull pace of continental europe or south america. You HAVE TO IMPOSE YOUR STYLE, you have to DOMINATE the other teams. This is you bad habit. you play not to lose, an in turn lose the one advantage you do have over every other country out there. Your HEARTS. You are supposed to be LIONS, and if you truly are, go out and play like you are the killer. If you are going to risk losing, lose the way you would normally play. That why the players are so heartbroken, because they know that they lost and have the regret of not playing to WIN!
You need to have the attitude, we are the best and its not a matter of when we beat you but how bad a beating do you want.
The Germans have had that attitiude for ages, and that is why with shite teams they still win. ARGENTINA found that out the hard way!
h

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 353.
  • At 02:51 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • JP wrote:

As a Canadian, I couldn't help but feel proud of the way Owen Hargreaves played on Saturday. He played with the heart and passion....attributes usually associated with our hockey players, but Canadian grit nonetheless. However, I think even Owen would agree, he brings a certain package of qualities. He works hard and wins balls. Every team needs a player of his qualities to disrupt the opposition and get the ball back to the playmakers.
The problem with England was not recognizing that every team requires all kinds of players, and you cannot have two players with the same qualities (no matter who they are). Obviously one of Gerrard and/or Lampard needed to be sacrificed, and Sven didn't have the courage to do it. In the future you need a leader of courage to make the hard decisions in the face of extreme media pressure.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 354.
  • At 02:51 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • meg wrote:

Just wanted to say as an aussie living in london, that you place too much pressure on your sporting men and women to win, and when they do not live up to expectation it is the worst thing in the world. Don't get me wrong, it is great to see that the country is brought together by sport and the hope that you may finally win the World Cup after 40 years. But as soon as you are out, it is nothing but critism for the team that you were worshipping only a week ago.
In Australia if we don't win something we are expected to win ie the Ashes or an olympic swimming race we don't bag our athletes we are proud they gave it a go and got so far.
p.s I wanted England to win too.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 355.
  • At 02:52 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Rod wrote:

I agree but some reserves have to be made to the above said. We have a magnificent grupo of lads that were, are and will be eager to win a major trophy (Euro or WC) and have the potential to do it. I think now that Sven is gone we can now start thinking England can play premiership footy and not some non-sensed style that never clicked with they lads' abilities and passion. The natural game of english players is a physical, high-tempo vertical style, and you must be and idiot (no offense Sven, haha) if you couldn't realize that Becks is no longer a footballer. Think about a midfield with Hargreaves playing the holding role, Gerrard pushing forward from center to right sector of the pitch, Lampard just behind our two strikers, Rooney and Defoe (sorry Theo, and Michael u gotta get off some injuries) and Joe Cole drifting through the left sector. Rooney is a football monster, he will deliver. And the back four, think about it, world class footballers, except for Neville, but he's on his way to rest alongisde David Becks.

So, summing up, Euro 2008 is ours. Everyone of you who reads this lines will rememeber me when we lift that trophy two years from now.

We have to support our lads who tried but where smuggered by Stupid Sven.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 356.
  • At 03:30 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Peter O'Reilly wrote:

Despite an untimely exit, brought about by highly questionable refereeing, I've been delighted with the performance of the players; their tireless running for the entirety of every game, their willingness to contest every ball and their pride in wearing their National colours. And, astute management, tactical awareness and the capacity to draw the best from the players has shown the coaching staff to have excelled. I'm proud to be a supporter of the Australian team.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 357.
  • At 03:36 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • neil wrote:

As a Scotsman, (yes, I know, I know...) I wish the bookies had given me a price for someone being sent off (for Rooney read Beckham) followed by righteous indignation in the media (xenophobic facists the lot of them) finishing up with a foreigner being blamed for all your woes (Kim Moller Neilson anyone?)

I'm not unsympathetic, after all I've spent most of my adult working life in Eng-er-lund and without fail I've been well received whether it was London, Manchester or Newcastle.

But, and there is a but, you picked the wrong manager, who picked the wrong squad and hence team, who played badly - not once, not even twice, but five times.

You were lucky against Paraguay, were scared of T&T and held on desperately to draw with Sweden.

You had the chance to show the world, and I mean the world, what you could do with Ecuador but no, you failed again to set the heather alight.

Is there anyone out there who watched the Brazil V France game and can say hand on heart that England V Portugal was even in the same ballpark? I for one don't think so.

As for Ronaldo, his name might be Cristiano but that doesn't mean he wants crucifying.

Finally, if you want neutrals to support you, get rid of people like Motson and the xenophobic media that perpetually crow about '66 or that because you gave the world football you deserve better.

PS - As for the Premiership being the best league in the world? for entertainment possibly, for quality? nah, nae chance.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 358.
  • At 03:42 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Jim wrote:

Atleast we discovered Aaron Lennon on a global scale.
Finally people will realise his talent further than Martin Jol =x!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 359.
  • At 04:06 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Dave Froggatt wrote:

Just a point about the much maligned David Beckham. He didn't have a good World Cup and I guess he would be the first to admit it, but don't say he had no passion for England and the team - he has always had and still has loads. Everybody knows he does not run or dribble with the ball and that his skill lies in the accurate long ball and free kicks. The problem was that Ericksson decided to take away his effectiveness by only using one forward and even he ( Rooney ) is better working off another forward. Just remember that even though Beckham had a poor time, his contribution in the competition was :-
Scored against Paraguay : won 1-0
Crossed for Crouch to score against T & T : won 2-0
Scored against Ecuador : won 1-0
ie a poor Beckham showing directly contributed to 3 out of England's total of 6 World Cup goals. If only all our players were so poor!
To sum up, the problem in my opinion was not England's players, but that they were told to play a defensive system and seemed scared to open up and really attack the opposition. When you read our team sheet, almost all like to get forward and attack when they play for their clubs, but playing for England, 'the formation' seemed to be more important and so they were playing a different style from that they were used to - and it showed.
I hope McLaren wasn't responsible for that.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 360.
  • At 04:12 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • freddie wrote:

I am as passionate about England as anyone else on this forum! However I never thought for one moment England were going to lift the trophy.

Lets be realistic about this. We are not good enough as a team. Yes we have the players but we have had a guy in charge for too long who did not know the best formation and was scared of dropping names who were not performing.

Look at our performances before the tournament started. Northern Ireland. I will say no more!

Lessons learnt from this world cup.

1. Lampard and Gerard should not play in the same team.

2. Beckham is not inform at the moment. Drop him.

3. Owen Hargreaves has shown why he keeps a lot of stars out of the Byern Munich team week after week.

4. Playing dull defensive football doesn't win world cups.

Unfortunately I am not inspired with McClarens appointment. I hope he proves me wrong by taking some positive steps over the next twelve months.

Also us fans and the media need to be realistic about our chances!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 361.
  • At 04:12 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Andrew wrote:

People criticising England are talking rubbish. We lasted longer than Spain and the Czech Republic (ranked no2 by FIFA), not to mention Mexico and USA (both ranked top 10 by FIFA). We exited at the same point as Argentina and Brazil - which is hardly embarassing. And had Aaron Lennon been awarded a penalty, or had one of Lampard or Cole's skied shots gone in, we wouldn't even be having this conversation. You people talk as if England would get thrashed 3-0 by the likes of Italy, France, Brazil, Germany, etc. You talk as though there is a gulf in class between England and the top 20 countries. England were unlucky. On their day, they can beat any team at this world cup, and on a bad day, they could probably manage a draw. Psychological problems with penalties aside, England could have won this world cup. England have been beter than France over the past 4 years, yet France could win next week and we'll all be saying how great they are, just because they hit form and got lucky at the right moment.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 362.
  • At 04:19 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • colin wrote:

reviewing the game and the english campaign now that the emotion has died down some things remain the same.
the only thing we can say sven was right about was owen hargreaves. he showed his class , drive and determination and should be a fixture in the squad - as long as he is played in his right position. squad selection was bizarre and most of us knew this. depending on injured strikers was always going to be aproblem if you have no replacements. and if were going to waste a place on taking a mascot along for the ride can we raffle that position off ? that sven can still justify taking walcott shows how wrong he and inept he was - goodbye and good riddance. at least in mclaren we have an english manager who perhaps has some passion for the national team and wont spend the game sat on his butt looking bored and clueless.
we need to accept that we should play the game the way our players know best - at pace , with 4-4-2 but with one concession to the foreign game - we need to cheat more.
with all the talk of clamping down on diving 'simulation' shirt pulling etc why did the refs consistently fail to act on that? look again at the rooney incident. he was battling to stay on his feet , was dragged to the ground by the portugese player pulling on his shirt with the ref stood immediately in front of him and no free kick given . in future guys you should fall over as soon as there is any contact , roll around , claim your face is hit when its on your chest a la henry and maybe we'll get somewhere.
that said we were poor and never looked like we were capable of winning the cup. we have players capable of performing but if they are not for god's sake replace them. lampard , beckham in particular did not perform . don't believe the hype and let's hope that in future the manager isnt afraid of upsetting the glamour boys by dropping non performers and playing those with form and hunger.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 363.
  • At 04:22 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Simon Morris wrote:

England almost always self inflate the belief in themselves before every tournament.
The manager has to say he believes he'll win the tournament or the press will crucify him for not being ambitious enough.
So we then have the press full of 'England are going to win the World Cup/Euro Champs' and when it doesn't materialise - see every tournament since 1966, everybody seems so surprised.
The one and only time we Scots took this approach, 1978, we were humbled by Peru - kicked off the park by Iran and then gloriously managed to do not quite enough against Holland.
I think the English players would do a lot better if there wasn't so much pressure of expectation of them to win every tournamnet they enter.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 364.
  • At 04:24 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

I am absolutely amazed at all the comments in the English press, comments from readers and comments from the writers. Really, do you remember 1966? Remember when the referee took it away from Portugal to give the game to England? And it was your only World Cup victory! But this is too old! What about the 2004 Euro? At club level, what happened to Manchester and Liverpool? Those two teams were eliminated from the Champions Cup by what team? Benfica, from Portugal! So, lately the English football has been losing to Portuguese football at all levels. So, where is the surprise? So, what you expected? These are facts and not some kind of paranoiac opinion! Look at Mourinho! He goes to England and becomes champion twice in a row! And this year he will be not only champion in England, but he also will take the Champions Cup. Can anybody see a trend here? Can anybody take any lessons from all this? Regarding Rooney, yes I don鈥檛 believe that he did it in purpose, because he is a man and he knows how bad it was. He stamped him there and next in his knee, right in front of the referee. What can anybody expect? Ronaldo did what every player does all the time. Why attacking Ronaldo? He defended his teammate, the same way he defends his teammates in the MU team. What people expected? That Ronald asks the referee not to expel Rooney from the game? Lets be honest, never mind being serious about football!鈥

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 365.
  • At 04:40 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Tim wrote:

To win or at least play well, Lampard had to fire. He didn't... I think he's still a great player, but he has a lot to do to fix his reputation.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 366.
  • At 05:02 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • james taylor wrote:

It must be great to be the girlfriend of one of these grossly overpaid underacheiving English football players, to be able to 500 pound bottles of champagne,or spend 30,000 pounds in butiques in 30 minutes, or charter a plane to fly back to England to have their hair done, or somebody elses hair attached.
It made me sick to read about them all the time while at the same time the England team in the group stage were playing against 2nd and 3rd division players and actually playing worse than them. Wit the exception of about 4 players, all the rest underacheived throught, and all we got were excuses like "it's too hot', 'We couldn't get ant water" and the best of all " don't worry, youll see the best of us in the next game". It was obvious from the start that they didn't have a clue, that they were very lucky to reach the last 16, but you know we can't blame Erickson or the players picked even though he had 2 years to gell them into some kind oof team. It's the people who appointed Erickson in the first place and then sack him before the WC begins.A real fiasco from the start.
The only good Manager in the WC who could gell a group of players from all parts of the world and non of them overpaid clowns was Hiddick. A man like him would have never picked players like beckham, lampard, terry,Rooney,Owen and oh boy, not forgetting our brilliant goalie Robinson. And now we have an English coach, so that's another backward step I could go on and on, but I'm going to quit because I'm so fed up with it all and look forward to a Germany v France final. If onl;y the 成人快手 and the English press tell the truth as it is, and not make everyone think that we had a chance of winning something. I was at the 66 world Cup, 40 years ago, and unfortunately it will be at least another 40 before we win again, and if we do I hope that were I will be there isn't any 成人快手 or English Press to try and kid me that we have a winning team.
Cheers.
P.S. I think the reds will take the title this coming year, and you wont read that in the press or on the 成人快手

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 367.
  • At 05:07 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Paul S wrote:

The real culprits in all this are not the weather, the referee, Ronaldo, Rooney being sent and so on and so on it is the FA. As ususal the 30 million English fans have been conned by the 'men-in-black'. It is time for revolution at the FA headquarters based in of all places 'seedy Soho'. Sums up the FA perfectly.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 368.
  • At 05:47 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Burto wrote:

Great article,I'm an England fan through and through but moved from England to Western Australia 13 years ago and (it realy does hurt to say this) I think England should have a good loook at the way the Socceroos played thier football, they may not be the most gifted and talented group of players but all of them (with the possible exception of Harry Kewell) play with a passion and desire to put Australia on the footballing map, (44th in the world what a joke that is!)these players wear their hearts on their sleeves and an absoloute desire to play for their national team and they never took a backward step,yes you could argue they had some luck but didn't we?, if the players could of shown 1% of the passion on the field that the England supporters (all around the world) show off the field we would truly be world beaters, but until they wear the three lions with the pride and the passion that we as supporters do then we will always be also rans.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 369.
  • At 05:58 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Richard P wrote:

Lessons can certainly be learned from the disappointment that has been Englands performance at World Cup 2006.

However, I do think there is hope for the future. Aaron Lennon and Owen Hargreaves have cemented their places in the starting 11 for me and if, as is being widely reported, Terry Venables is invited to play a meaningful role for England then I feel we will make steady progress and have a good chance at Euro 2008 and World Cup 2010.

I was gutted to see Terry leave the post in 1996 and still think he has no peers when it comes to tournaments.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 370.
  • At 06:09 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ray Richards wrote:

Holy doodle, what am I reading about England's football team! Beckham should be praised for being a factor in all the goals England scored, for helping defend when needed, putting up with being hacked at and grabbed and for being up front at opportune times. The herd mentality seems to be a part of the English psyche, get drunk and fight as a herd, be negative about a player as a herd, say beforehand that Hargreaves should not have been selected as a herd (man of the match in a 10 man display of determination). The U.K. is not developing enough highly skilled young players because the teams now prefer to import players.Get over it you English supporters and help the players be proud of going as far as they did. Some praise and appreciation makes players want to do better. Try it! A Canadian whose parents were born in England.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 371.
  • At 06:16 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Arthur Montford wrote:

Ohhhh, We're on the march with Sveng's army we're going to the Germantines and we're gonna shake them up when we win the world cup cause England are the greatest football team ...... repeat.....repeat.....nuff said.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 372.
  • At 06:43 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David Guest wrote:

England can & will win a world cup. The mistake was made simply by the appointment of Sven as manager. His choice of players selected, his captain & his substitutions.......ALL INCREDULOUS!
Defoe, Bent, Johnson, Dawson - not there & Jenas not required.. Walcott, an ace in the hand (others teams would have been unable to do the scouting on him) unknown, speedy & skillful, even ten minutes would have been good for him and England, we shall never know? Lennon & Carrick, both not used to advantage.
Beckham, can turn a game in a second, but twelve games between goals... he needed to be dropped! A leader he is not. Terry & Gerrard have lead their respective teams to success and a captain should not be dropped, so why was Beckham Englands? Had he been dropped, I'm sure he would've have come back spitting feathers & perhaps had more of the old determination.
England's preparation for the world cup was abysmal! Perhaps that was down to Messers Ferguson/Wenger/Mourinho but compared to the other teams.... England played the least matches in competive competion or friendly matches and made the most substutions (remember those infamous half-time everybody change games).
I look forward to the European Championships & 2010....more young blood from the U21's, Lennon & Walcott - match experienced...watch out world, here come the stars!!!!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 373.
  • At 07:13 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Andrew wrote:

Have great individiuals, don't play well as a team. The only reason we went out. And all those that say Rooney and Gerard are over rated, I say don't make me laugh, look at the German team, are you really trying to tell me that their team is littered with world class players, and all of our players are overated, come on. We have the the individuals, but until we get the blend right, and play as a unit we won't win anything. It has been Englands problem since I can remember, and no one ever seems to do anything about it, so every two years it the same old depressing story. So to all those who say England players are over rated I say shut up, we have some of the most gifted players in the world, and just cause they don't play well together, does not make them crap. I think that every World Cup has shown us that you don't have to have a team full of the best players to acheive success, Germany learnt it a long time ago, yet we carry on making the same mistake over and over again, and I can't see it changing, till we finally get a manager with some balls to drop some of the big names and play a strong team rather than a strong group of individuals we will carry on wining nothing.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 374.
  • At 07:23 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ted wrote:

italy's seria A has been importing overseas players, well before england started doing the same, the italians don't seem to have suffered from this? they look a much better team than the englanders, I can't see how importing players into your league diminishes your players, it should enhance their skills!

The English actually believe that they invented football...
what a joke! the romans bought the game to britain!,
& london was founded by Romans!, you know it's true!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 375.
  • At 07:46 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David wrote:

As I am not Britsh, hopefully can be unbiased in my observations. While England were never going to win the World Cup, they have got fair results. The key England player never was Rooney, it was Beckham. He was the key, if he played well England could win, without him, not much of a chance. His biggest problem for fans is his lifestyle, not his football and as he has got older, he should be playing more of a central role like Zidane. The rest of the players, like Gerard and Lampard didn't step up, and sorry, Crouch is a joke, thogh not a much as Sven. I hope Beckham isn't lost to England, he has much to offer still and deserves more respect for how he has conducted himself both on and off the field.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 376.
  • At 07:58 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Degsy wrote:

Agree. Not good enough. Not good enough to take any of the half-decent chances that came their way and nowhere near good enough to take by far the best chances - the penalties themselves. The same poise under pressure is required for either sort of chance and the failure to take any of them shows where we are quality wise. Is it any coincidence that the only one to score a penalty is the player who plays in the land of the penalty 鈥 Germany.
The manager's role is crucial as our 'star' players need strong leadership, someone prepared to drop several of them in order to make a better TEAM. But is that man McClaren?
And Rooney is no excuse. He was harshly treated as it no clear-cut stamp at all but would we have won if he'd stayed on? I doubt it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 377.
  • At 08:03 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Olunukne Shorinwa wrote:

Personally, I think the officiating at this event has been a joke and a lot of teams has gone out due to the wrong decisions. On the part of some players, they go to ground at the slightest contact or faked contact, knowing fully well that the officials will follow in the same manner. This is a message to FIFA, "Let's not forget there will be a bit of contact in this game and seasoned refrees should be brought in next time and possibly video technology, which might have helped teams such as Australia, Korea, Togo and even England.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 378.
  • At 08:13 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Chris wrote:

We need football's equivilent of Clive Woodward to take us further. He took a team of good internationals and turned them into a disciplined and virtually unbeatable team; so much so that when they played badly in the World Cup Final they still had the belief to go through extra time and win.

Is Steve McClaren this man? I'm not so sure, but he could do worse than listen to the likes of Woodward, Mourinho, and Steve Waugh in how to build a dsiciplined team and lead with ruthlessness and not emotional attachment

Andrew is right, we have the players, we just need some leadership to build this talent into a team

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 379.
  • At 08:32 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • michael wrote:

Klinsmann the next England coach?

If yes, I think England could win again!

Klinsmann could bring passion, fun, speed and creativity back in Englands game. Before that, however, he would need to clean up the team, by kicking out pretentious Hollywood wannabees (Beckham) and guys who are just worried about looking good on the pitch with am arguably stylish haircut (Ferdinand).

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 380.
  • At 08:39 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David Ash wrote:

Well here we go again. England out of the World Cup. Missed penalties, wrong formation,the wrong players selected. Beckham is useless etc. etc. etc.The reality is that since 1966 we have been unable to find genuine goal scorers. Players who can poach a goal.Look at the 1966 squad. There were goal poachers in the squad and the squad built around them. Forget formations start with the end in mind, scoring goals.Any team that leaves the result to a penalty shoot out will always lose more than they win. It is always the roll of the dice.There are goal scorers in the premeirship, select them and build the team around them to give them the service they need. This game is about scoring more goals than the opposition. There is too much emphasis on structure rather then on individual goal scoring ability. Defence has usually been fine. Over the years we have been unable to consistently score more goals than our opposition. Mr. McClaren should be given the time to put these things right. His first job would be to appoint Allan Shearer as his assistant. A consistent goal scorer who would be able to identify those who are ready for selection. Yes in two years you can win the European competition.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 381.
  • At 08:43 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ross Watts wrote:

Phil W makes a great point... While the rest of the world is exporting players all over the globe to better themselves and experience foreign climbs, most of our future England stars rot in the reserves or have to satisfy themselves as bit part players.

It's no surprise to me then that Italy and Portugal have reached the semi-finals as the majority of their players (whether first XI or squad) actually play week in, week out for their clubs in thier home country.

In comparison we had a 17 yr old on the bench after struggling to find any other decent English strikers, no ideal second or third choice keeper and about 6 players not fully fit because there was no one else pushing them for thier places.

People were going made about Hargreaves inclusion... All I can say is Jermaine Jenas!!! WHY

I don't blame Sven for this debacle however. The whole culture of football in wrong in England. Check the media and fans response to Hargreaves and Crouch... Just about the only good things to come from this World Cup for the 3 Lions.

They proved they were good enough, when frankly most of our over-hyped heroes (Lampard, Beckham, Terry, Gerrard, Ashley Cole) struggled.

Time for tough decisions and a touch of realism. We're a second tier World Footballing Nation with a superb domestic league which thrives because of the money we and sponsors pump into it and the foreign stars that it attracts.

Until the FA stop trying to milk football like it's some big money cow and focus on actually building from the grass roots, nothing will change.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 382.
  • At 08:56 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ian wrote:

Are the German players good enough to win the World Cup? Can anyone seriuosly make a case for one of their outfield players starting for England? (Assuming SGE had taken fit forwards)

The problem with the England team was/is the management. SGE took a seriously talented bunch of players and produced a muddle. Klinnsman has taken a bunch of generally average players and built up their confidence and got them playing AS A TEAM. He also realised that their defence is awful so they play an attacking game, to his plan. England had no plan, maybe 4-4-2 or then 4-5-1 or maybe 4-1-4-1. These things should have been worked out in friendlies before the WC. Not through necessity at a World Cup!
With the four teams still left in what a wasted chance!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 383.
  • At 09:10 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Charles wrote:

England were poor throughout, playing prehistoric football. I doubt they strung 5 passes together all tournament.

The players are just not good enough, except in their own and their Agent's minds. They should take good a look in the mirror and be honest with themselves, if that's possible.

Ghana showed more skill, flair and style than England.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 384.
  • At 09:17 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • billy wrote:

I just don't like c. Ronaldo. England wasn't the best of the world, but being able to get into this stage, it wasn't an easy task.

C. Ronaldo had the insight about Wayne Rooney's weakness. And he did something nasty...I guess he thought his teammates to do something to irritate Wayne too. This guy was really nasty.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 385.
  • At 09:21 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • lawson65 wrote:

We need to go back to the grass roots and start again. France did this 20 or 30 years ago and now look at them. World Champs, European champs and now another semi. Ok, they had a few blips but they at least put two pots in the cupboard and after a poor start, said ok its time to star playing football lads.

And there in lies the problem, when the time comes to start playing football, England just can't. We aren't good enough, two exceptions maybe apart - Rooney, the one off footballer we seem to produce every generation and Hargreaves, a guy totally schooled outside the English game.

I play for an old men's amateur team here in Germany and the skill level and tactical awareness is well above anything of the same standard in England. A simple example, the goalie never kicks it it is always PLAYED, from the back.

Penalties are like being on that first tee, when you are playing on your first big course and all of a sudden a little pressure comes on. You go back to the basics and go for what is easy, if the basics were wrong in the first place, then ..... Watch out on the car park.

One thing though, I must say, at least Gerard and co made the goalie make a save not like some of our earlier failures, with balls blasted over the bar.

Why do Germany always do so well, one - skill level. Twp & probably most important they experience it more under match pressure. Thier cup competitions are always just one-off games, no replays. Ergo, it happens more, you take more under REAL pressure situations.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 386.
  • At 09:24 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Steve Williams wrote:

I don't know what it was, but this World Cup didn't ever raise me beyond the usual "Going out for a drink" excitement. What happened to the drink spilling in the pubs due to over excitement? There wasn't anything to get excited about, not once really. The Joe Cole goal was the nearest it got. Glad we got through.... At least we can only get better..... Building players up. Putting players down. As much the same as the last World Cup where Nicky Butt's inclusion was questioned by all and sundry before playing quite well, Owen Hargreaves suffered the same fate only to prove the doubters wrong. He ran for the whole game. Effort gets the fans going. I don't think i've seen Lampard or Beckham sprint yet. Admittedly, Beckham is way past his best but Lampard (Currently World's 2nd best player) should take a long hard look at himself. I'd be sacked if I performed like some of them did. I'ts OK blaming the manager and rightly so for some of it, but the players should be able to play better than that together. I don't think they honestly realise what the average fan goes through or what it costs to follow England. I exclude mainly the back 4 from this, especially Gary Neville who isn't a pre-madonna. The players will now be relaxing on some beach in luxury waiting for the new season to start where they will no doubt earn millions more and remind themselves what great World class players they all are again.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 387.
  • At 09:24 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Nigel wrote:

I am a Welshman but I supported England without reserve for the Finals. However, I can't help but feeling England fans were short changed. We can complain about refereeing decisions and cheating but ultimately it came down to quality and planning. That Eriksson took this long to produce a team that looked as it had assembled for the first time for a pub match is deplorable when so much talent was at his fingertips. That two barely fit strikers were taken without contingency so that when the INEVITABLE occurred, he dare not risk Walcott and so had to resort to a formation that he had never tested.

Eriksson was a mistake from the start and to have allowed him to philander his way through his lucrative tenure while squandering England's best chance since 66 to gain major honours in Portugal and Germany is the sporting crime of the century.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 388.
  • At 09:35 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • lee wrote:

like watching paint dry was englands performance... utterly dull and uninspired throughout the tournament, but hey i expected no more i never listen to the hype . when you get to forty and seen as many appalling shattered football dreams as i have, it all becomes second nature.You have to realize that most of the rag writers are probably inching into their early twenties and are still full of youthfull pipe dreams themselves! you cant blame them lol. Personally im no longer the keen england supporter i once was as maturity brings a sense of reality about false optimism. We shall and will always be an average side its always been the case in my forty years on this planet, We as a nation have won sweet fa with the not so beautiful game that is long overdue a facelift. I agree with most of the foreign bloggers on this site, and we should pull our heads out out of our hooligan self inflated ego arses and face the bitter truth. We are at best an average side at worse a deluded bunch of media crazed, self indulgent, prima donnas, with obscene bank accounts and appalling taste in women .

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 389.
  • At 09:36 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • SD wrote:

Outsider's view:

I think England did not play bad specially after Rooney got off. It was as if they got a new zeal, which I haven't seen in England team for long time. So without Beckham and Rooney, team was really great. I do not have anything against Beck or Rooney. They are good players but they are hyped so much. I am sure they feel the pressure of all this attention. If they were in any other country/team, they would have been good strikers but not ultimate sporting legends.

The world is generally not amused by England's defeat but the excuses they come up with after any game. So please stop doing that and accept your team as one of the good team but not the Best!!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 390.
  • At 09:44 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • erc wrote:

There are 2 reasons why England fail. A bad coach with poor field tactics and football plan and a lazy bunch of players with an exceptional few. If WC footballers are tag with odometer, England players would show the least mileage run with their heavy weighted legs. The coach and players keep on saying ugly football is not important, winning is important. If that statement of ugly football and its kind of blind and mediocre performance can so easily wins you the WC, then the WC is valueless. The England team are like lobsters without the 2 claws, wingless. Blame Sven for it! In football if you can't attack by the 2 wings and simply depending on frontal attack, forget about it. Look at the Portugal's wing players. Big name, Handsome players, heavy leg players can go for modelling, not for the football field. England will never win the Euro2008 or next WC with this substandard team that cant even string 15passes.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 391.
  • At 09:44 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • stu wrote:

A lot of these comments about Ronaldo and Rooney really are a joke and gives an insight into the mentality of a few england supporters. Rooney should knock seven shades of shit out of him (Grow up), he wasn't going to even give him a card till Ronaldo got involved(Yeah cos a ref is going to take his word over what he saw right in front of his face), ronaldo has an insight into rooneys temperament (as does any other player who has ever watched rooney play).

The blame for Rooneys act has to lie firmly at the door of Sven. He is not a lone striker, the 4-1-4-1 formation does not suit his style of play, there were too many times when Rooney had the ball played to him and there wasn't another england player within 30 yards and they weren't even closing in to support him.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 392.
  • At 10:04 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ross Leach wrote:

You might want to tell M Ryder that Terry Butcher did a marvellous job in pulling Motherwell out of Administration, by developing a group of young players.

If the England team had half the commitment of his sides they would have done well.

Typical lack of knowledge of Scottish football by someone down South. If people like M Ryder broadened their horizons they may find that people can actually play a bit in other countries, hence England dont deserve their usual favourites tag.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 393.
  • At 10:04 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Wez wrote:

I think it's been summed up perfectly - we just weren't good enough. There were a lot of things that contributed but Rooney shouldn't be made a scapegoat, and neither should Ronaldo. The stuff written in the press is for two reasons and two reasons only; a) to sell the papers, and b) to unsettle Manchester United. True, Rooney was frustrated but, I don't think he deliberately stamped on Carvalho and was a victim of his own honesty in staying on his feet when 80% of players at the World Cup wouldn't have. Once again, Eriksson's insistence to play his best 11 individuals has harnessed the team; Lampard should have made way for Crouch to allow Rooney to do what he's best at. And now all we've got to look forward to is more tripe under McClaren; I can't help but think we may be best off not qualifying for Euro 2008, get McClaren out, and get a man with passion in. You don't even need to appoint an English manager to get that, just look at Big Phil.....

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 394.
  • At 10:04 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Kingo wrote:

Joe Cole is so over-rated it's ridiculous. Admittedly against weak opposition he can at least look as though he knows what he's up to, to the untrained eye anyway. However, against any sort of quality he has absolutely nothing. He got lucky with his wild smash for his goal but I can't believe no-one has noticed the following:- it's easy to do 7 step overs and whaterver other tricks you like if you go in a backwards or sideways direction. I can't remember an occasion where he went forward and actually passed by an opposition player having beaten him. It's always the same - a few step overs followed by cutting inside in a meaningless way. The left-side is still a big problem area for England.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 395.
  • At 10:10 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Paul Hallett wrote:

Just so very upset that, once again, I have bought into this England team for another tournament. Why do we not have the mental capacity to win these shoot outs? I genuinely hurt since that fatigable day. Although it is facile to blame Sven, what with his clueless attempt to persuade us he had a plan 鈥榖鈥, but the players have not covered themselves with glory and, despite being a bit of fan, I believe Beckham鈥檚 offer to play for England under McLaren was more pf a plea. I cannot blame Rooney for his 鈥榮tamp鈥 as it didn鈥檛 look deliberate but the boy does have to understand frustration is part of the game and he has to play around it. Like the original poster, I cannot see past Joe Cole for any player who has enhanced his reputation this World Cup, maybe Hargreaves too.

What is happening to English sport? Last summer was one of the best I can remember; England were on the crest of a wave being RWC champions and just having regained the Ashes. Now, England provide another soporific tournament, England鈥檚 cricket team look like they are a patched together group of village green players and the Rugby team, well let's just not say anything about the rugby team.

I am tired out expending so much hope on these damn teams.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 396.
  • At 10:27 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • lawson65 wrote:

Let's just face it, we weren't good enough. We need to step back, like France did 10 to 20 years ago and start completely from scratch. We just do not produce players for this level, with odd exceptions like Rooney, Gaza maybe but even then they are bought up with an English game that is flawed, from the grass roots up.

Why is it the Gazas and Roonyes of this world, always seem to have flawed temperament?

We lose on penalties because we do not have the basic skill level to fall back on, that is even more so required in the pressure cooker situation of penalties.

Why do Germany, crush all challengers at penalties. One, again, is skill level but hey, the Argentinians have that in abundance. However, I may have the solution. After living here for a couple of years I think it is their cup system. It is only ever a one-off match, with no replays and so the penalty shoot-out comes up far more times and hence, the palyers experience it more often. That may seem simplistic but as a guy who plays amateur football and who has been there, you just cannot replicate that situation, no matter how much training you do.

One last thought, at least this time we made the goalie work for all our misses, rather than in previous attempts where we have seen players (Beckham, Waddle, I think) blasting it over the bar. If it is on target you always have the chance of the goalie going the wrong way but then, I suppose you have to have the brains not to look exactly where you are going to put the ball and do so, liek Ricardo said our palyers all did.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 397.
  • At 10:30 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • jp wrote:

Firstly, I have to admit that I'm Scottish and so had mixed feelings about wanting England to progress/win the World Cup, not against the team or most of the fans but mainly the hysterical and sometimes xenophobic media (C Tyldsley take note). On the football side, I'd love the chance to manage England - do I think I could get to the quarter final by just picking the 'best 11' and sticking them out on the pitch - Yes. England's biggest obstacle - F.E.A.R.

Forget history and expectation, be bold, adventurous and innovative.

Enjoy. Never seen a group so gripped with fear. I'd get Eddie Izzard / Billy Connolly et al in the night before each game

Aptitude - pick the right players for the right games not always the 'best 11'

Results - will come.

jp

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 398.
  • At 10:32 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Dave wrote:

If the entire nation cancelled their Sky subscription maybe we would get an England team with something to play for.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 399.
  • At 10:33 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Matt wrote:

The Premiership is one of the greatest leagues in the world and we are blessed that we have so many talented footballers from around the world plying their trade in our country. However this is damaging the progress of our national team. Look at the last four of the world cup. It can be argued that Italy and Germany have top level leagues, but few would argue that they match the Prem or La Liga. Portugal and France? Nowhere near in terms of quality. However, all their top players play abroad, meaning their leagues are able to give pitch time to younger players. The same applies to Brazil and Argentina, although q-finalists this time around, few can dispute their World Cup pedigree. As England fans, can anyone suggest any alternatives to Sven's squad?(the Walcott farce excluded) There is no real pressure for places and when this occurs, players get complacent. Ultimately, we can't have it both ways. Although it hurts now, in a month I'll have forgotten about this WC and will be glued to the Premiership again. The WC is a great sideshow, but with all the FIFA egos wanting to be recognised through their ball tampering and stupid refereeing directives, the enjoyment is being threatened. Would most of the Red cards that ruined WC games have been given in the Prem? I don't think so. I'm gutted we're out of the WC, but the real football starts in august.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 400.
  • At 10:39 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • JC wrote:

Supporters are all the same in every country. You still have something to cheer about: France might lose at some point in this WC!
There is a very thin margin between success and failure and we proved it in the first round. Now we look unstopable... until the next game!!
I am always amazed with the blindness of english fans. You always find a foreigner to blame for your failures: argentine ref, portugese striker, swede coach...
Think about Rooney for just a second! the new Pele! Targeting Ronaldo's record!! Did he mean in terms of red cards ?
Rooney is THE typical englishman. The one I'd like to hate if I did not like England and its people. That is probably why you are trying to put the blame on someone else. But come back to reason: yes, you have good players. Yes, your team would be a challenge to anyone. No, there is no way you could have won it. Lampard was exhausted, Owen injured, Gerrard a bit lost, Terry is HIGHLY overrated, Rooney forgot his brain in Manchester again, Robinson... not much to say about him!
So maybe next time, you still have a chance: your side will be very competitive in 2008 which is not our case!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 401.
  • At 10:43 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Rob wrote:

I can't understand those who believe the players are not good enough. There are a number of English players who perform consistently well in the Champions League and would surely be in the starting line ups of all four of the remaining teams. Those teams all came into the World Cup knowing exactly how they would play and despite one or two of them starting slowly have got better as the competition has gone on with the possible exception of Portugal who to be fair were without their best player. The main problem must be the manager who for some reason didn't seem to know which players and formation he was going to send out from one game to another. The top managers all seem to establish the way their team plays from the very beginning which makes it easier to tweak the system when things aren't going to plan. Sven never seemed to have a plan and how many managers who want to win a World Cup take a young player along just for the experience?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 402.
  • At 10:49 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Patrick wrote:

A very poor England in an otherwise very entertaining World Cup. You could either put it down to luck, or (more likely) to the stupidity of Rooney's actions and the tactical failures of Eriksson.

I really didn't buy into the media's 'Rooney's our only hope' crap. He's a good player, but it was an insult to the other players putting so much pressure on him. "Look, Rooney's kicked a ball, Rooney's done an overhead kick. England is saved!" Give me a break. The only consolation for me was that the media got what it deserved with the Rooney sending-off. It was utterly stupid for Rooney to act more like an 8-year-old schoolboy than a professional footballer.

In addition, I think the biggest flop of this World Cup was Lampard. I don't think anyone expected his performances to be so woeful, and probably Eriksson's biggest mistake was to leave him on the pitch and take off one of the best performers in Joe Cole (and a potential penalty taker.) And realistically, I don't think someone who had around 30 shots and failed to find the net once would've had the confidence to take a penalty would he?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 403.
  • At 11:05 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • JW wrote:

When will we ever learn, it is clear that Scolari has been employing tatics which in our view is cheating but has been left Portugal in a semi-final and possibly a final by the weekend. The difference between winning and losing on this stage is so slight that one free kick, one booking or one sending off will give you an advantage. Scolari knows this too well, he is a winner. It's time we understood the unwritten rules of success.

With regards to the penalties, Ricardo stated that he could see where the ball was going from looking in the england players eyes. Lehmann memmorised a crib sheet on where the Argentinians generally placed it. If a Liverpool goalkeeper had been goal we would have seen some wobblie legs in action. It's all about mind games, something we are not good at.

I suggest we put forward a plan to FIFA for inclusion of penalties in friendles after the 90 mins are up.
We cannot continue to realise our limitations every two years.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 404.
  • At 11:12 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David Cotty wrote:

As a neutral I hope you will allow me to make some comments about English sports teams in general.Over the last few weeks I have watched the English rugby, cricket, and football teams get beaten.What in my opinion they all suffered from was lack of belief in that they could win.OK they said they would win but the belief was not there.Take the Aussie football team no big stars, but they played with belief, the same as all Aussie teams.As a Kiwi and naturally an All Black supporter I went to Twickenham last year to see them play England.Even though England had the majority of the possesion there was only one team who had the will to win.I think its a problem with the national mindset, praise for the gallant 10 men etc etc, Dunkirk and all that.Look at the Henman madness, he would be regarded as a failure in other countries, he became a cult figure.
Its the self belief thats required, and maybe you need coaches who can give your teams that self belief.I am no supporter of Clive Woodward but he gave the team self belief, it appears that Erickson did not have that talent.Fred Trueman had that belief.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 405.
  • At 11:33 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Dan wrote:

I'd just like to say that the vast majority of you people are quite unbelievably stupid.

Thank you to the ones that aren't.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 406.
  • At 11:41 AM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Ben Dirs, 成人快手 Sport wrote:

Thanks for all your replies - clearly a lot of people wanting to get things off their chest! What surprised me most was the amount of people who agreed with my basic sentiments. Normally when you come out and criticise English football, you are accused of being bitter, negative and unpatriotic - among other things. However, this time I think there is a collective realisation that we have been hoodwinked - by the media in general and the players themselves - and that there is a need for sober reflection on the state of the English scene, a scene that has produced a single semi-final at a major tournament in the last 40 years. Will anyone listen? Not likely.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 407.
  • At 12:09 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Redcurrant Europeanson wrote:

Jock, post 320, has it spot on.

The trick is to play the best team of 11, not the best 11 individuals.

A midfield of Cole, Hargreaves, Gerrard and Lennon would have more fluency. Up front Walcott could then have been used for the last 30 minutes in place of Crouch, using his (apparent) pace to get behind defences and maybe draw fould from defenders unfamiliar with his game.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 408.
  • At 12:46 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • David Barker wrote:

Our tournament epitomised everything that is wrong with the Uk today.

The whole build up was hyped up and spun. It had a manager and a team who are grossly overpaid and whose main intetests are making money. We also had to endure those ridiculous wags (subsidised by us mug punters).

There was no real strategy to the team just spin on how wonderful we were. We had players in the team who were there because the manager did not have the nerve to drop them. Does this not sound familiar?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 409.
  • At 01:06 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Dave wrote:

There is so much to say on the subject of why England dont or havent done well in the World Cup or any other tournaments, but there are only a few reasons which are critical to our lack of success and one of the most important ones which cause us to fail time and again is down to what the media print or televise.

I havent read a single news paper since the world cup started and Im glad because I have my own opinions and views which havent been influenced by what I have read.

The media is brain washing you all and making you and the whole tornament experience a negative one.

I have however seen the news on tv and everytime there was a Match which involved England there was always a refernce to the fact that there was trouble before or after the game involving England fans. Do we really need to know this? There were hundreds of thousands of fans watching in and around the stadiums. Most of which had a trouble free experience. So why are they telling millions of people about a few arrests? When I go out to a night club or a pub there is nearly always a punch up or scuffle where the police have occasionally intervened. This doesnt need to make the headlines so why should a few idiots who have had too may beers make it onto the news every single time. I am bored of it and it isnt important or helping the genral feeling.

As for the refereeing? When a player is determined and trying hard to win the game for himself, his team mates and his country, sometimes their determination will result in some contact with another player. This fact is inevitable and it is easy to tell when a player is acting in this manner. Referees are punishing player who have this approach which is fair enough if you can see that player has no intention of trying to win the ball. Penalties are not being given when a player is fouled in these situations so when the same thing occurs outside the box why are cards being flashed all over the shop? The cheats, the divers, head-butters, spitters elbowers and influencers are ruining the game for England and the rest of the world. Is it any suprise that Portugal, Italy are in the semis? The only teams that have won the world Cup have done so by cheating their way there. That includes England who cheated when they won in 1966. That ball wasnt over the line and we all know it. The biggest cheat tho was Argentina and Marradona and thet remains to this day an unpunished act along with Figos head butt and many other cheating offences which have been commited.

Im glad England lost. They havent cheated since that goal in 1966 and they can hold there heads up high as being a nation and team who can play a game( yes its a game) without resorting to getting players sent off etc.

And by the way the referee had enough time to act before the Rooney alleged stamping offence, but he choose to let the two portugese players bundle and kick him before blowing for a foul. The refs are useless and why have they got ear peices and microphones? They dont use them to consult anyone about decisions. (grahame Poll).. So why bother?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 410.
  • At 01:17 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • sandra wrote:

People soccer is just a game! A beautiful one at that so please don麓t turn it into something ugly with comments of beating up players.
What Rooney did was wrong and he should accept responsibility for his actions.
p.s. touche to comment 117.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 411.
  • At 02:30 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

overpaid, overhyped and very badly managed, and to make matters worse an FA with the foresight the length of my little finger ie choosing our future manager whom is just as culpable as errikkson. the long wait WILL sadly continue

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 412.
  • At 03:10 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Bill K wrote:

Does anyone see the cycle already started to again?

"Lennon & Hargreaves have earned a spot on the next team"

Both played fantastic during the WC.... Also, no one has earned anything yet. The next team should be comprised of the players playing the best and the best together at the time of the next tourney.

Quit all this "Pick your best 11" cr@p. THe premise is fundementally flawed if you want England to win anything.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 413.
  • At 03:33 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Serge wrote:

I totally agree. Phil W specially. Why do we think that England are good enough to make it to the world cup final? We were lucky enough to get to the quarter-final. Ok I don't like the man but Sepp Blatter was right when he said that England were the most boring team to have reached the quarter-finals!! Who did we beat to reach that stage? It would've been interesting if we had started out in the same group as the Ivory Coast...We have alot of foreigners players in this country because our players are technically inferior, with the exception of Gerrard, Rooney and Cole. That is the sole reason why the foreign clubs won't buy our players....we are great at stamina but can't control a ball, even when we are being paid for it!
Our footballing system has to change and the public's notion on the national team has to develop...We are NOT a team capable of winning a competition until we learn how to play and until we have a manager that doesn't massage egos. Shame the FA messed up the 'appointing a coach' before the world cup. We could've had Scolari and he would've been able to turn us into a proper football playing team. Sack the FA I say!!!
I want to be positive about McClaren but all I keep feeling is that he will drag us to the Graham Tayloreske dark ages. Sorry. I hope I'm wrong!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 414.
  • At 03:33 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • sandra wrote:

What i dont understand is why the quality of the Portuguese team is downplayed as the reason for England麓s defeat. For the last 4 years Portugal have consistently been in the top 10 world rankings, semi finalists in euro 2004, a brilliant midfield with Deco and Maniche, a gem of a player in their full back Miguel, Carvalho a world class defender and up and coming star Ronaldo, nevermind the needed experience and stability of veteran Figo. And the last time,correct me if i am wrong,that England beat Portugal was 40 yrs ago, even then with some help from the referee! As for the label of cheaters, please dont confuse the team of 2002 with the present squad!
enough said.
P.s. South Africa rules!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 415.
  • At 03:55 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • GL wrote:

405 IS SPOT ON. In over 400 posts, only two that I see have identified the problem. It's the F.A.! They pick the manager. The manager picks, organises and motivates the players. Brian Barwick is fat. In the head, too.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 416.
  • At 04:43 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • C. B. Dixon wrote:

I am a Canadian so as far as the World Cup tournament is concerned, I have essentially nothing to cheer about as my country hasn't yet "made the grade". However, I supported England and the United States teams until their respective eliminations. Despite England's departure in the quarter finals, they remained in contention throughout the tournament longer than I expected. Though defeated by Portugal, clearly, the best team did not win the match - in my opinion. Had England prevailed, who knows? Maybe, just maybe, the anniversary of the 1966 championship might have been repeated. Perhaps next time for England. And, hopefully, Canada will be part of the tourney as well. Hey, never say die! Here in Canada, and in the U. S., many of our losing sports teams use the cliche, "there's always next year"! Also, a tip of the hat to the great English fans - their frequent rendition of God Save The Queen during the matches denotes how well they support their team and country. I would have enjoyed sitting in the stands amongst the English fans and waving my flags of both England and Canada!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 417.
  • At 04:44 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • HQ wrote:

We must now think of the future and here is my answer to the future for Euro 2008 which is the next challenge for England and realistically a semi-final spot is the target no further!!!


3-4-3 forces the team into an attacking counter attacking style which will suit England. (subs in brackets)

GK: Robinson(James/Green)

DEF: G.Johnson J.Terry R.Ferdinand
(O.Hargreaves)(Curtis) (Ferdinand)

MID: Lennon Carrick Gerrard A.Cole
(Bullard) (Lampard)(ReoCoker)(Downing)

FWD: Rooney J.Cole Defoe
(Bent) (Crouch) (Walcott)

On verge:
Harewood,Aliadiere??,Carlton Cole

Let there be competition for places and lets play to win do or die and forget about penalties.

Come on England!!!


Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 418.
  • At 04:53 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • SRM wrote:

I am disappointed at the English media and also at the fans...
Its unbelievable how people are trying to put the blame for england's exit of the WC on Ronaldo! Did nobody see what Rooney did???? he stamped on Carvalho - with his back foot. He was not off balance, and so it can't have possibly been an accident. I think that he might not have intended to stamp on his 'bits', but he was definately aiming for some part of his body.

Ronaldo did as any player of the opposite team would have done - actually, come to think of it, someone else did!!! Did no one see PETIT also speaking to the Ref????? of course not... because Ronaldo is the perfect scapegoat! Its Rooney, and only Rooney that can be blamed for the Red card. He stamped on a player, and then pushed and verbally assulted another player... what kind of referee would have kept him on the field!?!?

ok, 1st rant over.... next one:

Alan Shearer and Ian Wright... For me, its very difficult when England play Portugal as i support both teams, but when it comes down to it, i support Portugal - My family is portuguese, and i was born here.
I have always admired Alan Shearer... until Saturday. His comments were unacceptable and rude, giving a message of violence to all 19 million (or however many people were watching). As much as every English person has the right to be upset that England are out, they do not have the right to stop others (in this case, the Portuguese) from celebrating the fact that their team has got through. The first thing i did, after the penalties on saturday, was to take down the portuguese flags from my car, and my house - through fear of English 'bad losers, and drunk' fans damaging my belongings. That can't be right, can it??
Shearer and Wright should both be made to apologise publically on the 成人快手.

One last thing... England didn't lose because of Rooney's sending off... they actually held the game pretty well... England lost because they can't score penalties.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 419.
  • At 05:21 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Bill K wrote:

We don't need to accept this cr@p. Look at the other teams in the tourney. Is there any other team that looks to have more desire and talent than England. No.

Anyone see a parallel between England and Brazil? Just put your best 11 on the field and that's good enough(?) All the big names played for Brazil also....Do you mean to tell me that no other Brazilian impressed in practice enough to earn a starting spot and have one of the bigger names sit down? The result was the same as it was for England. Spotty play and an early exit.

A non-football parallel, the US basketball "Dreamteam". Clearly individually better than the rest of the world thought they could just show up at the Olympics and outclass opponents. Only to be beaten repeatedly and embarrassed.

The mindset is flawed as has been repeatedly proven. Too much emphasis on the individual in a team-sport.

We've got the heart. We've got the talent. What we lack is honest self-evaluation. Can we bear to have the most touted players sit if it increases our chances to win?

Talent and desire are not enough to win. You need capable and courageous leadership.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 420.
  • At 06:18 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Miguel Cro wrote:

I think the person in comment 418 is absoultely spot on!

Rooney did stamp on the Portuguese player and it was intentional- i watched it in slow motion and you can see that he paused before doing it- don't tell me he was getting his balance.

I for one was disgusted at what Alan Shearer and Ian Wright said on Live TV. How can someone that people have looked up too for years encourage violence?

England played really well, but it was not to be this time around.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 421.
  • At 06:20 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Dan wrote:

This world cup like most previous ones was another example of an England controversial exit out of the world cup. Why was there an Argentinean referee? We all know of the tense relationship with England and Argentina, this just seemed wrong to me (like have a Scot refereeing an England match or an Iraqi refereeing a usa match, they could be bias).
Should rooney have got a red card?? I don鈥檛 think so; the so-called stamp on carvalho was unintentional rooney was just getting his balance it was just unfortunate where his foot landed, if you watch this in real time you can see this.
As for the referee he didn鈥檛 even see this when you watch the replay he is not watching where rooney鈥檚 foot lands. So when he says the red card was for the so-called stamp on carvalho, this is a load of rubbish.
As a man utd fan I think ronaldo鈥檚 inferance is bad sportsmanship, but I think if you put any other player in rooney position I think that they would of reacted the same way towards ronaldo, so rooney cannot blamed so much.
Rooney just got sent off for the little push on ronaldo which should have been yellow and the referee and fifa are just saying that it was the stamp so it covers up the referee鈥檚 very poor decision. And why is rooney being investigate for violent conduct, luis figo headbutted a player during the world cup and fifa don鈥檛 investigate that, it just seems it bit corrupt to me.
It would not surprise me at all if in the next european tournament England are knockout due to another controversial decision.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 422.
  • At 06:42 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • SRM wrote:

Reply to post 421 (Dan)

How can u say that Rooney cannot be blamed for the red card???
Why can't you just admit that Rooney was wrong, and once again lost his temper!
Once again, i state that Ronaldo didn't even look at Rooney - Ronaldo was talking to the ref. Why did Rooney feel it necessary to push Ronaldo? - Because he can't control his temper or his mouth.

I believe the Ref was going to award Rooney with a yellow card for the stamp, but because of his push on ronaldo, and his fowl mouth - he had no choice but to show him a Red card.

There is no Personal attack or conspiracy on England - Thats the way the game turned out - and as usual, English press and Fans can't accept the fact that they lost and are out.

Once again, i remind you all that England lost on Penalties - not because of Rooney.
Ricardo is a brilliant goalkeeper, and because of him, and him only are England at home today.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 423.
  • At 07:01 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Anti-England wrote:

ALTHOUGH IM ENGLISH - I THINK THE ENGLAND FOOTBALL TEAM IS THE BIGGEST PILE OF "FRANK" (WITH A W) EVER! SOO FCUKINN SHIITEE ITS UNREAL.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 424.
  • At 07:35 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • stewart wrote:

My cards are on the table. I am a Scot, not too displeased at the outcome. I would however like to contribute seriously to this debate. You are out of the World Cup and angry because you believed the media hype that has been telling you and us that you were going to win. The truth is that the manager is every bit as bad as the German idiot we employed for a short time only, unlike you who were held under his spell. Your players are not as good as they think they are or with their average intellect as good as they have been told they are.
The squad selection beggared belief and you have a wee ned who requires anger management classes rather than football coaching. To suggest that he is the Golden Boy of English football is a joke. He is a ned who would be in jail if he could not play football.
Your new manager does not inspire and I would urge you all now to accept that you have a good team but not a great team and certainly not one ready to win a major tournament.
All that having been said I would have been happy had Scotland achieved what you achieved last week.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 425.
  • At 07:43 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • wrote:

> Why bother playing. Why not just sell the trophy to the highest bidder?

Too late =)

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 426.
  • At 09:12 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • Keith wrote:

I can't say i was too surprised that England failed yet again to go past the quarter finals of a major tournament under Sven. Unlike 1990 we had no momentum leading upto the quarter final, playing average in vitually every game other than maybe the first halfs of the Paraguay and the Sweeden game. A half decent manager with the talent we had should have got us to at least semi final.

The FA have to take a lot of the blame of this shambles because they fell for the overkill for something different after Keegan, and Sven is what we got. For them to keep giving him more money after failure after failure with the amount of money swimming around in the FA coffers to Sven shows they have lost touch with reality. What other business would reward a leader for such pathetic peformances, when peers like Scolari are paid considerably less money when they have had the biggest prize.

Im sorry but the only people celebrating england getting knocked out here in england are the bookmakers who stood to lose a lot of money if england won the world cup - but they knew deep down, england had no chance.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 427.
  • At 09:15 PM on 04 Jul 2006,
  • spirontas wrote:

This is a foreigner's opinion.
I'd realy like to see England make it through to the trophy, but never proved to deserve it.
Actually, the whole spectacle is in deep crisis, since it's key players, the stars, have been exhausted from their club duties.
Ronaldinio was supposed to carry barcelona on his back since last summer, playing the CL final just a month and a half ago, what could he give more?
Gerrard has been playing since last July without stop, premiership, cups, CL, you name it. You'd expect more from him?
When are these guys going to rest before their clubs start preparing for another exhausting season? Wait and see how many of these top players will be "burnt out" come next CL season.

FIFA's marketing hunger for continuous TV spectacle is draining the blood out of european club players. They've complained about it themselves a couple of years back, but who's there to hear them?

Athletism CANNOT be Professional. It's all about competition, not TV rights and sponsorships.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 428.
  • At 12:42 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Sandro Signorini wrote:

Perhaps the british journalists (and their German brothers) might learn two things from this World cup experience:
1.- to start bragging after winning (if they ever can), and
2.- to respect their opponents and their countries.
I do not think that Britain can be so proud of their results, as well as of what has been published.
Anyway, be proud that at least England reached the 2nd stage thanks to such stellar achievements as beating Paraguay (own goal) and managing draws with Sweden and Trinidad & Tobago.
Silence is golden.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 429.
  • At 01:47 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • russell wrote:

england haven't had a competitive game against opponents of the same calibre as themselves since the euro 2004 game against portugal and this is part of the problem - apart from the obvious inability of erickson and now mclaren to make good tactical decisions. would klinsmann take a 17 year old who hasn't had a game at arsenal. (are arsenal really that good?) do you think scolari would play lampard and gerrard in the same team game after game to so little effect? a good manager drops the players who aren't doing it and erickson doesnt seem to want to do this and there is no evidence that your new man will do any different. i am not an england fan but a scotland one.in 1978 scotland went to argentina with a media and manager lead hype of coming back as winners. our last game at hampden before we left was against england, a gamei remember england rather comfortably won but only by 1-0. i have never forgotten that and i think most scots are the same. we have achieved next to nothing since and face the challenge of france italy and the ukraine in euro 2008 qualifying group. we face this realistically. maybe if england approached their task with a similar level of humility and reflection then they may get beyond the quarter finals of a tournament.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 430.
  • At 02:13 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • tommi wrote:

The England World Cup Highlights DVD is out now. It runs for 3 seconds total and shows Joe Cole's screamer.

What a joke of a coach. Imagine what Hiddink would have done with the England squad. They would have actually come out to win and attack. SGE is about as inspiring as a wet weekend in Hull. The English world cup tilt was BEIGE. The players were more worried about their haircuts and whether the socks were pulled up over their knees than actually getting stuck in.

How sad.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 431.
  • At 03:18 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Ted wrote:

I would sugguest that England abandon their dreams of winning the World Cup but to compete as UK or Great Britain(nothing great about Britain now though) Team where you can pool the talent of the Scots, Welsh and the Irish. It is also only fair that places to compete be given to more deserving nations. England is not even a sovereign nation. Talk about fair play. You always have double standards and score own goals.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 432.
  • At 04:26 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • John wrote:

The state of English football has mostly been in the pits since the 1990 World Cup. The only bright spot has been the semi-final in Euro '96. Otherwise, it's been one failure to qualify for a World Cup (1994), one Round of 16 match in a WC (1998), a struggle to qualify for another European Championship (2000), a failure to advance out of their group in that tournament, and consecutive eliminations in major tournaments on penalty kicks (2004, 2006). Sixteen years of frustration.

What truly worries me is what will happen if England don't do well in the qualifying run for Euro 2008, and Steve McClaren is sacked. That will leave precious little time to find a replacement for the next World Cup. I love Steve McClaren dearly for all that he's done for Middlesbrough, but he really does strike me as a transition manager. I wonder if the FA regrets their decision now to hire him, because they did so before the World Cup.

He doesn't represent a new beginning, but rather more of the same. Just like the FA. They need new blood, too.

One more thing - please, oh please, someone open an academy to teach all English footballers from ages 12 to 35 how to take penalty kicks like the best in the world game.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 433.
  • At 06:42 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Hal Mangat wrote:

At best the team reached out for mediocrity. The respectful way out was at the hands of Portugal. I hate to think what may have happpened if the English Squad had met Ghana in their knockout !!
We fans have ourselves to blame for loving the players more than the game, and now they are bigger than the game !!

Nacho Libre extruded more passion !!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 434.
  • At 10:32 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Mike wrote:

I agree with the previous comments about the standard of refereeing throughout the competition. For me, a passionate England supporter, but also one who enjoys watching good football played by any side, the tournament has been ruined by over zealous refereeing decisions. A good game needs to keep going and the outcome needs to rely on the player's footballing skill and not their ability to fool the referee.

We need to accept that football is a physical game and that it is inevitable that players will take plenty of unintentional knocks during the course of a game; most of the yellow and red cards I saw issued throughout the competition were not justified. The irony is that Rugby Union (the underdog in terms of popularity) has alreeady successfully addressed many of these problems. For example, players are only permanently sent off for the most serious of offences, otherwise they are sin-binned for ten minutes and then only reluctantly. The ref has access to instant video replay from all angles so that he can make fair decisions. Fans get their money's worth because they see a game fully manned for the full eighty minutes (when the ref sends off a player, it destroys the game).

I am not sure what the message was the referees were trying convey. Did they think that by handing out so many yellow cards they they were getting tough with the players? If so, they made a serious error in their calcultations. The players simpley played to the referee using it to their advantage, feigning fouls with the sole intention of getting the other guy dismissed. The tragedy is that, most of the time, the referees fell for it!

Football is the greatest game on earth but it needs a bit of an overhaul. FIFA needs to take a good look at the standard of refereeing and relax a little about two players colliding. It needs to modernise and make use of video technology. Referees and players alike need a good deal more mutual respect.

As to my thoughts about England's performance.... Well, a bit perplexing. We have, it is true, some world class players, at-leaste as many as in any other team. So, why did it all go so badly wrong? Poor management is all I can think. There was just no passion. It felt as though we made it through the group stages more by luck than by judgement and that we were somehow present in the quater finals under false pretences!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 435.
  • At 11:33 AM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Jem Owens wrote:

For this World Cup, there were no players missing from the England squad because of injury. But there were players in the squad who were not fully fit. Perhaps it would have been better if Owen and Rooney had been unable to make the squad at all.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 436.
  • At 01:13 PM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • kevin yuan wrote:

too much have been said about the performances of this England team in the world cup. there seems to be many faults and wrongs that led to England's exit. However, one thing few failed to mentioned that the FA should ultimately be held responsible for the failure. Those in the corridors of power at soho squre knew too well after Euro 2004 that SVG was not right man to lead the national team to glory. until then the FA had spent too much on him, they had to kept him in the post in the hope of recouping all the losses by gambling on England winning world cup. what a nightmare, not only did the FA get nothing in financial return, and also England lost its reputation as a distictive footballing country. the team are being laughed at aomong the fans all over the world. those millionaires on the pitch were like lame ducks, if not headless chickens. do not give excuses about pressure, i would like to be under the pressures, if i was paid millions of pounds in wages.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 437.
  • At 04:48 PM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • Matt wrote:

Having watched club and international football for 30 years it has always appeared obvious to me why English players never play as well for England as for their clubs. AND IT IS NOT LACK OF EFFORT OR PASSION. Effort and passion will only get you so far in an international. It is the lack of tactical understanding displayed by english players, and always has been.
For their clubs they will play with the same team mates using familiar strategies, for 50+ games a season, they are taught to do, not to think.

Lets take an example in the world cup. English defenders were criticised for using long ball tactics, and are told not to. This misses the point and deals with the effect not the root cause. The root cause of the problem is the poor movement off the ball of the english midfield. English players rarely pro-actively run off the ball in midfield, frequently the man on the ball is left with few if any options.

Next comes the most basic principle and foundation of any team sport. Defence thrives on organisation, and attack thrives on chaos. England can defend, (because they are taught and organised), but lack the thought and imagination to create chaos in the opposition ranks.

Creating chaos translates into either forcing and /or out-thinking opposing teams defensive organsiation, to allow time and space to create goal scoring opportunities. i.e. with either clever movement off the ball and away from markers, or with people who can beat their marker with the ball at feet, thereby causing defenders to move from their normal positions. When Aaron Lennon did the latter in the World Cup England looked a much more dangerous side.

If England are to ever win a major international trophy the players must learn to think and understand the nature of the contest. As a final point about how tactically ignorant english players have been, consider how many have become great and succesfull managers in the premiership, (think Arsenal, Chelsea, Man U, Tottenham, Liverpool), makes you think, yes?????

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 438.
  • At 05:02 PM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • portuguese wrote:

Common, you're not so bad. We (Portugal) are better. That's all there is to it, folks.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 439.
  • At 05:17 PM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • bissyusa wrote:

I am an American and a novice football fan. Obviously, the sport is not that big a deal here, so most Americans I know were rooting for England. I may not know much about football, but I am a sports fan and I know what sets a team apart -- it's heart and passion. I didn't see any heart or passion from the England squad. Any championship team in the US, whether it be American football, basketball, hockey or baseball, the teams that make a difference have heart and passion. Watching other World Cup matches, such as France and Brazil or Germany and Italy, each of those teams played aggressive, passionate football. That can't be said for the English squad, which is too bad, as most of America was rooting for you!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 440.
  • At 07:16 PM on 05 Jul 2006,
  • bissyusa wrote:

I am an American and a novice football fan. Obviously, the sport is not that big a deal here, so most Americans I know were rooting for England. I may not know much about football, but I am a sports fan and I know what sets a team apart -- it's heart and passion. I didn't see any heart or passion from the England squad. Any championship team in the US, whether it be American football, basketball, hockey or baseball, the teams that make a difference have heart and passion. Watching other World Cup matches, such as France and Brazil or Germany and Italy, each of those teams played aggressive, passionate football. That can't be said for the English squad, which is too bad, as most of America was rooting for you!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 441.
  • At 03:08 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • JariN wrote:

I just can't understand English football (or supporters). Here's why:

1) You had a great coach, who lead you to the World Cup (which is never an easy task). You even got as far as against Portugal.

2) You always have to blame someone (the referees, the coaches, C. Ronaldo or whoever) for your losses. Rooney deserved the red card for what he did, and he didn't have a part in losing (or winning) the game later on.

3) I really wish C. Ronaldo would leave ManU, they (the fans) don't deserve him. Why did Beckham leave the UK by the way? Beckham is still one of the best players of the world, so please keep pushing them (your best players) out of the UK, they'll surely find good teams in Europe.

4) Grow up will you!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 442.
  • At 05:44 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • Andy wrote:

Let's be honest, when was the last time England really quickened the collective pulse on the pitch? Owen against Argentina? The 4-1 win over Holland in 1996? The 5-1 win in Germany's back yard? Lineker's hat-trick against Poland in '86 or the four he scored in the friendly win in Spain? The only thing that surprises me is that we constantly feign surprise that we continue to disappoint. Set your expectations to low and then beating Ecuador comes as a welcome surprise!

I love the World Cup for two reasons. Firstly because you get to see the likes of Italy, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil. And then there is the blinkered, penalty-missing madness of England, that narcotic tension that we all now will inevitably end in heartbreak in the quarter finals, yet we each come back for more just in case a miracle is set to happen.

We all believe we will see England win the World Cup again (or a Euro Championship - which hey, is harder to win) in our lifetime, but we have no more 'right' to do so than Holland, Spain, the Czech Republic or Portugal, each of whom boast more technically accomplished players, and arguably have a greater claim on destiny than we do.

Despite the cynicism of the knock out stages, my abiding memories of this tournament will be the best set of long rangers since Mexico 86, the best team goal since Mexico 70 (hey, maybe they should host it again?!) the best international football match since Spain 4 Yugoslavia 3 in Euro 2000 (both Italy-Germany and Argentina-Mexico can lay claim to that) and hopefully a worthy winner in Italy.

Sometimes you have to look beyond these shores for inspiration in the beautiful game. By sheer dint of the infinite monkeys/typewriters scenario, at some stage we will end up with a manager and a set of players who realise what it takes to win a tournament, and realise our dreams in the process. Hopefully we are all still around to see it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 443.
  • At 06:30 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • Lon wrote:

Let's be honest. The Premier League is not the best league in the world, and for all those talking about hype, I think the hype from the Premier league contributes to the built up expectations of the Three Lions. The Premier league has 3 or 4 really good teams, and they are roundd out by international stars. Come World Cup or Euro time, these stars go home and the English are left to form teams with average players. I know many of you are used to seeing the Gerrards, Lampards and Rooneys of the league play gracefully week in and out, but how many actually watch la Liga, Seria A and the Bundesliga? These English players are good, but there are much better players at their respective spots in other leagues. English fans must be realistic and realize that the reason their team never wins a national side is because so much of English club success can be attributed to international stars that make national stars look better than they are.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 444.
  • At 08:31 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • Arne Wagenaar wrote:

Personally I think the English team is crap. The rest around is all fuelled by wishful thinking and then trying to blame someone else. Kind of childish actually. Just accept we lost, that it is just a game and try again. Do you think anybody else outside England cares that we got kicked out and thinks that possibly "the greatest team in the world" lost world glory due to a lousy coach or referee? Give me a break.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 445.
  • At 09:29 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • James B wrote:

Firstly, I haven't spotted anyone pick up on the fact that the English team is probably the most honest out of all of the teams involved. As reminded to us in last night's semi-final with France playing Portugal, the Portuguese were falling about the place like nobody's business. I think it's disgusting. Rooney stayed on his feet, he could have quite easily fallen over with two Portuguese players niggling at his ankles. For that Rooney should be commended. And Ronaldo should not have got involved. Beckenbauer is spot on with what he said. Players should be carded for trying to get other players sent off. I feel divers should be punished also, if they are not, they will keep on destroying the game. I have seen enough of it in the premiership with Drogba and Robben to name two.

As for England's World Cup, far too much hype, Sven has always been too defensive and if all players partners looked like Cheryl Tweedy then it would certainly take your mind off the football.

Anyway, bring back Terry Venables as I feel McClaren will be a miniature Sven.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 446.
  • At 09:39 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • woolly wrote:

it is time england be brave enought to admit and face the real reason why the world cup was lost.To say Ronaldo cause Rooney dismissal and England exit is shameful .Lots of people in england wanted Rooney to be the best player on the pitch .He was not ---Ronaldo had a better game .Rooney is not the best player in england --------he has more freedom to express himself compare to the others .and there lies the problem with the english team .lampard and gerrard their two best players had no freedom as with their clubs Joe Cole role was limited Lennon never got his real chance .It is save to say England will never have a chance until England player are given the freedom to express themselves and play with high intensity as in the premiership for 90 mins

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 447.
  • At 11:26 PM on 06 Jul 2006,
  • James B wrote:

Firstly, I haven't spotted anyone pick up on the fact that the English team is probably the most honest out of all of the teams involved. As reminded to us in last night's semi-final with France playing Portugal, the Portuguese were falling about the place like nobody's business. I think it's disgusting. Rooney stayed on his feet, he could have quite easily fallen over with two Portuguese players niggling at his ankles. For that Rooney should be commended. And Ronaldo should not have got involved. Beckenbauer is spot on with what he said. Players should be carded for trying to get other players sent off. I feel divers should be punished also, if they are not, they will keep on destroying the game. I have seen enough of it in the premiership with Drogba and Robben to name two.

As for England's World Cup, far too much hype, Sven has always been too defensive and if all players partners looked like Cheryl Tweedy then it would certainly take your mind off the football.

Anyway, bring back Terry Venables as I feel McClaren will be a miniature Sven.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 448.
  • At 04:41 AM on 07 Jul 2006,
  • xxx wrote:

Rooney, Lampard, Gerrard, Owen, Beckham do not deserve t be int he team, Rooney should be suspended for ever. England has done great by losing, we get to drink more beer, having a party here for England's loss... Go on England, lose euro too... we will get more beer....
I love to see tears in England players when they lose... looks awsome...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 449.
  • At 08:37 AM on 07 Jul 2006,
  • Rikki Ferguson wrote:

The point that seems to be missed in most of these blogs, but has the greatest influence in the outcome of England's fortunes, is the fact that football is a big money business and controlled by money men. Sky tv has obviously contributed greatly to the interest in football in England, but the FA have been brilliant in channelling that interest into the national squad even with the vast majority of the paying public recognizing most of the flaws in the set-up. The media has manipulated these flaws even further to generate even greater interest (Sven's sexual exploits, Beck's celebrity lifestyle, WAGS are news, Rooney boy wonder, Maclaren right man for the job?, etc etc). The biggest problem for England fans seems to be anger at this manipulation by big business (as they laugh all the way to the bank), and they subsequently look for failures in the players, team selection, formation, set-up, management, etc etc, all of the flaws they were aware of before setting off for Germany. Quite a paradox really but they will be back next time for more of the same, much like addicts of any vice they dont seem to enjoy the withdrawl their drug induces!

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 450.
  • At 06:22 PM on 07 Jul 2006,
  • nigel wrote:

Portugal were defending well and thats why england couldn't get a goal. It takes a great strikeforce to barge past the defence after owens sudden exit, englands strikeforce lost itself and we got no goals. Great defending allowed 10 man england to stay in the game after rooneys red card, i think.

After another loss in a penalty shootout, England must pick themselves up and look to the future with a new manager, captain, i look forward to it.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 451.
  • At 04:57 PM on 16 Jul 2006,
  • john wrote:

maclaren has already decided there are not enough freeloaders on the english coaching staff bringing in venables shearer etcthere are more coaches than players this is why we cant win anything you cant have a committee to drive a bus.If the goalkeeper for instance doesnt know how to keep goal bhe shouldnt be playing its no use employing a coach to help him to dive the right way.sam was the man but he was to outspokenas was mr clough a few years ago. but that sopped all the freeloaders having their t'pence worth
john from widnes

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 

Post a comment

Please note name and email are required.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Required
Required (not displayed)
  Your email address will only be held by the 成人快手 and will be used for the purpose of administering this blog site. The 成人快手 may also contact you to further inquire about issues raised in mails posted to the blog. If you would like further information, please read the 成人快手's privacy policy
    

The 成人快手 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

成人快手.co.uk