³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

The newsletter only

Comments

1. At 01:55 PM on 17 Apr 2007, witchiwoman wrote:

   Its gonna be a good one tonight I feel...but watch for the bongs

2. At 02:12 PM on 17 Apr 2007, wrote:

   A record! arrived in under 44 minutes!
   Tuesday April 17, 2007 at 14:13:12 GMT
   xx
   ed

3. At 02:13 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Big Sister wrote:

   Hello Roger Sawyer. Classless, eh? Priceless, certainly!

   81-year old ASBO woman might well be a good story to follow behind while she serves her sentence. I'd be intrigued to find out the effect her presence has on other inmates, staff, etc. I imagine she'll be well treated - just as long as she behaves. Oh, I forgot! she doesn't know how to behave, does she? That should make any follow up doubly interesting.

   So, Eddie, do we have an idea that will run here?

4. At 02:31 PM on 17 Apr 2007, wrote:

   My message is in the "Recent comments", and it WAS here, but....

5. At 02:37 PM on 17 Apr 2007, The Reverend Green wrote:

   witchiwoman (1)

   Ah, the bongs. I've got all the timings of the gaps, you know. I've the dates and other bits of useful information logged as well. They're all recorded on my tape machine and logged in my red Analaysis book. You'd be surprised how its all mounting up, I know I am!

   I've a special stopwatch. It records the empty seconds perfectly - it's waterproof too. Oh yes, I may even produce a pie chart to illustrate the 'gap' frequencies. We had none of this with Val Singleton did we?

6. At 02:38 PM on 17 Apr 2007, wrote:

   Is that Roger Sawyer, classless.
   Or Roger Sawyer, no class?

   Confused.

   Si.

7. At 02:41 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Belinda wrote:

   Talking about the elderly lady who has been sent (very rightly) to prison, can I ask why 'young offenders' below the age of 18* are not named in the media when sentenced? In my mind, if the crime they commit is an adult one, as they so often are, they should be treated like adults when it comes to the punishment. Age should be no barrier to taking responsibility for the consequences of your actions. Any thoughts, or should I move this into the Burrowed Frow?

   *or is it 16?

8. At 02:49 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Yes, I've just got the newsletter. I note with particular disappointment "Not to be taken internally".

9. At 03:35 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

   Pushy-poos

10. At 03:52 PM on 17 Apr 2007, wrote:

    Appy, why would you want to push po... Oh, never mind, now I get it

    :p

11. At 03:56 PM on 17 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ap (8) - 92% on the smutometer!

12. At 04:06 PM on 17 Apr 2007, John H. wrote:

    (9) - I thought the toilet strand was the previous one?

13. At 04:33 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Izzy T'Me wrote:

    RJD (11) - do you ever actually make it out of the naughty corner? Just wondered if you knew what the rest of the world was like?

    John H (12) - surely that's the lavatory thread? :o)

14. At 04:38 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Fearless (10) Ewww! I just though it made a change from "PUSH!"

    RJD (11), What happens if I achieve the mystic 100?

15. At 05:05 PM on 17 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ap (14) I'm sorry but perfection isn't achievable! Use 99% as your target - I'll think of a suitable reward.

16. At 05:07 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Fiona wrote:

    Appy (8), you are SO naughty :0)
    x

17. At 05:46 PM on 17 Apr 2007, John H. wrote:

    Fiona, you think? Did you check out what she said on the Beach? I'm still not sure I read it correctly. Deary, deary me.

18. At 07:03 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Frances O wrote:

    Roger who?

    Oh, Sawyer.

    You are naughty, Eric.

19. At 08:36 PM on 17 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    RJD (15) You are so Catholic! Try every day to be as good as Jesus but know that you never can be. Pursue perfection knowing you cannot achieve it. Oh that makes me sad :-(

    On the other hand -- reward, eh? Oh well, that's something to aim for :-)

    Fiona (16) If you think I'm naughty you must've read something naughty into my post. What does that say about you then?... ;-)

    JH (17) I can't imagine what you mean. How are those sheep these days?

20. At 12:20 AM on 18 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Appy - aim high, though perhaps rjdstopit might find that easier?

21. At 09:50 AM on 18 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Valery, are you angling for spell in the naughty corner? :-)

22. At 01:03 PM on 18 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Where's my post from this morning?

23. At 01:10 PM on 18 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Tsk! - I don't know - try to raise the tone by quoting a bit of Latin and it gets binned. Double Tsk!

24. At 01:15 PM on 18 Apr 2007, wrote:

    RJD (22),

    Limbo or eaten by the blog gods.
    xx
    ed

25. At 01:20 PM on 18 Apr 2007, RJD wrote:

    Ed I - Can I adjust your words a bit? I think you've just happened on a cracking description for moderators - Bloggods!

26. At 01:50 PM on 18 Apr 2007, Sir Peregrine Entthrop-Boewes wrote:

    Can someone please tell me who is this Eric Muir that keeps pestering me with aeons old newsletters ?

    I shall press charges for passing off - he seems to think he's so terribly up to date, anyone would think he was a news reporter type with all this blather in the PM Newsletter about the United States about to invade Iraq - piffle, never happen.

    Where is the ice?

27. At 02:53 PM on 18 Apr 2007, wrote:

    Free and out of copyright, RJD!

    Bloggods and blaggards!

    ³§±ôá¾±²Ô³Ù±ð
    ed

28. At 05:52 PM on 18 Apr 2007, Frances O wrote:

    Oh, for goodness' sake. Jewish women sent to the back of the bus . Things thrown at them if they don't dress 'modestly'.

    Was this what our parents and grandparents fought WWII for?

    (I mean, as well as a love for democracy, liberty and the right to live a life free from fascism, militarianism and brainless discrimination, as far as I've been told)

    Sometimes I despair of the human race.

29. At 11:11 PM on 19 Apr 2007, Val P wrote:

    Appy 21 - well, I wouldn't mind, it's been a long week. Why, who else is there at the mo?

30. At 11:45 PM on 19 Apr 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Hi Val, RJDStopit lives there of course, and I'm there quite a bit myself tbh. I only popped out to say "Sir Peregrine Entthrop-Boewes you are an imposter and a pseudonym!... And I very much enjoyed your post!" Come on in Ms Pedant; the water's lovely :-)