³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Water voles...

Comments

1. At 01:43 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Susan Orty-Boyden wrote:

   Glad to hear Millican and Nesbitt are back!

2. At 01:43 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

   O good grief. I want my money back

3. At 01:57 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

   The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ. It's what you do when you should be WORKING! (And that applies to all of us...)

4. At 02:06 PM on 13 Dec 2006, silver-fox wrote:

   Water voles: elusive yet charismatic creatures.

5. At 02:06 PM on 13 Dec 2006, LadySnorkPenMaiden wrote:

   The picture that flew unbidden into my head when I saw jim_eddie_watervole.ram was even funnier than the one that arrived when I saw eddie_vole.ram . . .

   xx
   LadyPen

6. At 02:21 PM on 13 Dec 2006, LadySnorkPenMaiden wrote:

   The picture that flew unbidden into my head when I saw jim_eddie_watervole.ram was even funnier than the one that arrived when I saw eddie_vole.ram . . .

   xx
   LadyPen

7. At 02:22 PM on 13 Dec 2006, RobbieJohnDo wrote:

   Eddie

   You might have been inspired by Today but they nicked it from

8. At 02:31 PM on 13 Dec 2006, gossipmistress wrote:

   HOW long did you spend doing that?

   Parma Ham please....

9. At 02:34 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Mrs Trellis wrote:

   I think that you could put that to music, as in ISIHAC one song to the tune of another. My suggestion would be Ralph Mctell's "Streets of London".

10. At 02:47 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Er Hackenbush wrote:

    The sequel:

    Water Voles 4

    (queszion mark)

11. At 03:32 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Frances O wrote:

    I don't like all this ramming of water voles. I have a soft spot for them, as some of you know.

    It's here, all mossy and sheltered, by the riverbank.

    Heere, voley, voley!

12. At 03:48 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Er Hackenbush wrote:

    Collectively, a volley of voles?

13. At 03:53 PM on 13 Dec 2006, RobbieJohnDo wrote:

    Frances O

    You see Frances O, there you go again.

    Now I know you will feel better if you just share it with us. Now sit down, relax and ...

14. At 03:56 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Frances O
    Do you imply the Water Vole Steering Group have gone off course?

15. At 04:19 PM on 13 Dec 2006, valery p (Tumbleflump Holly-Hippoface) wrote:

    Has - (pedantry a speciality today)

16. At 04:57 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Frances O wrote:

    Quite, Valery. This is a particular bee in my bonnet. Makes me stamp my Minnie Mouse shoes in frustration

    (Minnie Vole?)

17. At 04:58 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Er Hackenbush wrote:

    Yes -

    persons have, but group has

18. At 05:36 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Frances O wrote:

    Does a-anyone else a-find the way a-Anne -Widdecombe speaks (regardless of thecontent) a-irritating?

19. At 05:44 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

    Good to see Pedantry back on the blog. Standards must be maintained, tha noze.

    Talking of nozes, and cute ones at that ... come, Frances O, and just whisper it to me. Use the back-route to find me, off blog, and tell me the story.

    I am, after all, the respected custodian of so many secrets on the frog ... none have ever been revealed!

    (Should that be Custodienne?)

    Trust Fifi.

20. At 05:58 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Noush wrote:

    Have you been talking to the Bishop of Southwark? When he was found throwing toys out of someone's car, seemingly the worst for wear, he reportedly said 'I'm the Bishop of Woolwich [sic], it's what I do."

21. At 06:08 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Frances O wrote:

    Oooh-er, fifi, that makes me even more scared (twitches nose, scurries down burrow)

22. At 06:09 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

    Frances,

    Yes, but I was uplifted to hear Condi Rice last night -er -um a- ing and all. So completely unable to explain or justify the prevarications of the Shrub.

    Schadenfreude!
    ed

23. At 06:32 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Frances O wrote:

    Ed - gezundheit!

    btw, which of the Freud offspring is Schaden?

24. At 07:22 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

    Thank you all for correcting my small slip.
    I'm sure I won't bother subjecting myself to such grammatical correction in the future.
    Did any of you get the content as a joke or were you all too busy being clever?

25. At 08:16 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

    Very good Valery P (15) I wouldn't have noticed but know you are right now I see it, & do like to ensure my grammar is up to scratch. I am serious.

    Frances O (22) very funny, can't think of a quip back but hoping RDJ will come up with something!

26. At 08:28 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

    RJD I followed your link & found Stuart Macpherson, East Lothian Council Biodiversity Officer, explaining "The picture looks bleak but we can help this cute wee creature."

    Is cute wee creature professional language now then, has he not been on one of those courses where were learn how to speak outside boxes in blue skys, cute wee creature??? I ask you!

27. At 08:32 PM on 13 Dec 2006, wrote:

    Well, now you're just being silly

28. At 09:19 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Dr Hackenbush wrote:

    Frances (18) - err, yes.

29. At 09:35 PM on 13 Dec 2006, valery p (Tumbleflump Holly-Hippoface) wrote:

    Oh RJD (7) - what have you been doing trawling through my local council website???? D'you mean I have them within my policies?

30. At 10:27 PM on 13 Dec 2006, RobbieJohnDo wrote:

    Aunt Dahlia

    Of course we got it, but you do set such a high standard for yourself. I'm still laughing at oily prat!

31. At 10:48 PM on 13 Dec 2006, valery p (Tumbleflump Holly-Hippoface) wrote:

    Lordy it's slow tonight - I posted something to RDJ about the local council earlier, or was it on another thread? I'm losing the plot...

    Aunt D, oh dear, I didn't mean to be nasty, just trying to be a smartypants, sorry. I did like your joke, honest :o)

32. At 11:31 PM on 13 Dec 2006, Nora Young wrote:

    Is it available as a ring tone?

33. At 12:30 AM on 14 Dec 2006, wrote:

    Helen

    As you value constructive criticism, I expect the sky's the limit.
    xx
    ed

34. At 08:35 AM on 14 Dec 2006, Vyle Hernia wrote:

    Ed (33)

    Ha Ha. Very droll