³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - Open Secrets
« Previous | Main | Next »

One is enough

Martin Rosenbaum | 16:39 UK time, Friday, 26 January 2007

How many FOI requests does it take to be considered a serial requestor assessed as costing central government up to £50,000 a year?

The answer in some cases is just one. Or at any rate it is according to Frontier Economics, the economic consultancy commissioned by the Department for Constitutional Affairs last year to assess the cost of FOI.

I have written previously about some of the considerable methodological doubts affecting the on the cost of FOI.

I was particularly interested in Table 5 of this report, which estimates the annual cost to central government of journalists' use of FOI as follows:

Media organisation - Requests - Cost
³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ - 750 to 2,000 - £300,000 to £1,000,000
The Guardian - 500 to 700 - £250,000 to £350,000
Evening Standard - 300 to 400 - £150,000 to £200,000
Mail on Sunday - 50 to 100 - £25,000 to £50,000
The Sunday Times - 50 to 100 - £25,000 to £50,000
Other journalists - 300 to 400 - £150,000 to £200,000

These figures are based on a one-week sample extrapolated to a whole year. I have also discussed before why I believe the Frontier Economics estimates for the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ are grossly exaggerated and methodologically flawed. But I wondered how many requests had actually been made by the other media organisations in the week specified.

And the DCA have today sent me the answers in a response to an FOI request I put to them:
Guardian - 11
Evening Standard - 5
Mail on Sunday - 1
Sunday Times – 1
All other identified media outlets and journalists except the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ â€“ 10

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌý Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 07:33 PM on 26 Jan 2007,
  • Paul Dockree wrote:

£50,000?

Martin, I think it was it the "Butch cassidy and the Sundance Kid" film line I am paraphrasing?

Well if they just paid me just £5,000 - I would stop writing my FOI requests.

  • 2.
  • At 04:32 PM on 28 Jan 2007,
  • Phil Lyth wrote:

"considerable methodological doubts"?

Downright shonky more like it, esp. when they seem to apply a flat Pounds 500 as a cost estimate. That would apply even in their eyes to your one line question on the number of requests ands the five line response.

Time to get Jack Straw to ask the next Parliamentary delegation to NZ to look at our Official Information Act in practice.

P.

This post is closed to new comments.

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.