³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ BLOGS - Magazine Monitor
« Previous | Main | Next »

Your letters

15:20 UK time, Tuesday, 10 October 2006

At least The Sun (to whom serious props) resisted the more bellicose "How do you solve the problem? nuke Korea."
Chris, Witney, UK

Re: . Just how many Walnut Whips do I need to eat to get an ounce of walnuts?
Christine Bowles, Milton Keynes, England

Dear MM, I must say how pleased I was to read today's juglandaceous article , if simply because it gave me an excuse to use the word juglandaceous, which means 'pertaining to walnuts'.
Kind regards,
Daniel Hayes, St Albans, UK

Wow! Misquoted by the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ! I feel so special. On the front page of the Magazine you have "Your Letters: Robin, Edinburgh: "I know De Burgh's secret". I never said this, but I'm very pleased to make on to the actual Magazine front page.
Robin, Edinburgh

Re: Graham from Munich's letter about bullets in water - it's just a shame we can't use the swimming pool to confirm these facts - as it is presently filled with old telephone boxes...
Mark Leonard, Docklands, London

Could somebody please clear up the bullets and water issue? I need to know how deep to dive next time I am being chased in an implausible movie scenario?
David Manley, Scotland

I have conducted a test to see how far bullets actually can penetrate water. I chartered a boat to the middle of the Atlantic and fired a bullet into the sea. It penetrated nearly 4 miles of water before coming to rest on the bottom. End of debate.
Colin Main, Berkhamsted, UK

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ iD

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ navigation

³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ Â© 2014 The ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.